Clinical Trial Results of a Modified Gore Excluder Endograft: Comparison with Open Repair and Original Device Design

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 328-338

  Curci, John A ^a   Fillinger, Mark F ^b   Naslund, Thomas C ^c   Rubin, Brian G ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANEURYSM; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE EXACERBATION; ENDOLEAK; ENDOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART DISEASE; HUMAN; INTESTINE FUNCTION DISORDER; KIDNEY DISEASE; LUNG DISEASE; MALE; MODIFIED GORE EXCLUDER ENDOGRAFT; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; POLITEF IMPLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEPSIS; SURVIVAL; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; UROGENITAL TRACT DISEASE; VASCULAR DISEASE; WOUND;

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS; DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34247632617     PISSN: 08905096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2006.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Matsumura J.S., Brewster D.C., Makaroun M.S., and Naftel D.C. A multicenter controlled clinical trial of open versus endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 37 (2003) 262-271
2. Bush R.L., Najibi S., Lin P.H., et al. Early experience with the bifurcated excluder endoprosthesis for treatment of the abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 34 (2001) 497-502
3. Cao P., Verzini F., Parlani G., et al. Clinical effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm endografting: 7-year concurrent comparison with open repair. J Vasc Surg 40 (2004) 841-848
4. Garcia-Madrid C., Josa M., Riambau V., et al. Endovascular versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a comparison of early and intermediate results in patients suitable for both techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 28 (2004) 365-372
5. Jordan W.D., Alcocer F., Wirthlin D.J., et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysms in "high-risk" surgical patients: comparison of open and endovascular repair. Ann Surg 237 (2003) 623-630
6. Hansman M.F., Neuzil D., Quigley T.M., et al. A comparison of 50 initial endoluminal endograft repairs for abdominal aortic aneurysm with 50 concurrent open repairs. Am J Surg 185 (2003) 441-444
7. Arko F.R., Hill B.B., Reeves T.R., et al. Early and late functional outcome assessments following endovascular and open aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther 10 (2003) 2-9
8. Patel A.P., Langan III E.M., Taylor S.M., et al. An analysis of standard open and endovascular surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians. Am Surg 69 (2003) 744-748
9. Prinssen M., Verhoeven E.L., Buth J., et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 351 (2004) 1607-1618
10. Greenhalgh R.M., Brown L.C., Kwong G.P., et al. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364 (2004) 843-848
11. Lee W.A., Carter J.W., Upchurch G., et al. Perioperative outcomes after open and endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in the united states during 2001. J Vasc Surg 39 (2004) 491-496
12. May J., White G.H., Waugh R., et al. Improved survival after endoluminal repair with second-generation prostheses compared with open repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a 5-year concurrent comparison using life table method. J Vasc Surg 33 Suppl 2 (2001) S21-S26
13. Krupski W.C., and Rutherford R.B. Update on open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the challenges for endovascular repair. J Am Coll Surg 199 (2004) 946-960
14. Kurvers H., Veith F.J., Lipsitz E.C., et al. Discontinuous, staccato growth of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Am Coll Surg 199 (2004) 709-715
15. Greenberg R.K., Deaton D., Sullivan T., et al. Variable sac behavior after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: analysis of core laboratory data. J Vasc Surg 39 (2004) 95-101
16. Cho J.S., Dillavou E.D., Rhee R.Y., and Makaroun M.S. Late abdominal aortic aneurysm enlargement after endovascular repair with the excluder device. J Vasc Surg 39 (2004) 1236-1242
17. Nordness P.J., Carter G., Tonnessen B., et al. The effect of gender on early and intermediate results of endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg 17 (2003) 615-621
18. Parlani G., Verzini F., Zannetti S., et al. Does gender influence outcome of AAA endoluminal repair?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26 (2003) 69-73
19. Sampaio S.M., Panneton J.M., Mozes G.I., et al. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: does gender matter. Ann Vasc Surg 18 (2004) 653-660
20. Rockman C.B., Lamparello P.J., Adelman M.A., et al. Aneurysm morphology as a predictor of endoleak following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: do smaller aneurysm have better outcomes?. Ann Vasc Surg 16 (2002) 644-651
21. Dillavou E.D., Muluk S.C., Rhee R.Y., et al. Does hostile neck anatomy preclude successful endovascular aortic aneurysm repair?. J Vasc Surg 38 (2003) 657-663
22. Torella F. Effect of improved endograft design on outcome of endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 40 (2004) 216-221
23. Laheij R.J., and van Marrewijk C.J. The evolving technique of endovascular stenting of abdominal aortic aneurysm: time for reappraisal. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 22 (2001) 436-442