Implicit sequence learning processes after unilateral stroke

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 335-354

  Orrell, A J ^a   Eves, F F ^b   Masters, R S W ^c   MacMahon, K M M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; IMPLICIT MEMORY; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MENTAL TASK; STROKE;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; SERIAL LEARNING;

EID: 34247631658     PISSN: 09602011     EISSN: 14640694     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09602010600832788     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bamford, J., Sandercock, P., Dennis, M., Burn, J., & Warlow, C. (1991). Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet, 337, 1521-1526.
2. Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E. (1988). Interactive tasks and the implicit-explicit distinction. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 251-272.
3. Berry, D. C., & Dienes, Z. (1993). Implicit learning. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
4. Boyd, L. A., & Winstein, C. J. (2001). Implicit motor sequence learning in humans following unilateral stroke: The impact of practice and explicit knowledge. Neuroscience Letters, 298, 65-69.
5. Boyd, L. A., & Winstein, C. J. (2003). Impact of explicit information on implicit motor-sequence learning following middle cerebral artery stroke. Physical Therapy, 83, 976-989.
6. Boyd, L. A., & Winstein, C. J. (2004). Providing explicit information disrupts implicit motor learning after basal ganglia stroke. Learning & Memory, 11, 388-396.
7. Cherry, K. E., & Stadler, M. A. (1995). Implicit learning of a nonverbal sequence in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 10, 379-394.
8. Cleermans, A., Destrbecqz, A., & Boyer, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 406-416.
9. Clegg, B. J., DiGirolamo, J., & Keele, S. W. (1998). A review of sequence learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 275-281.
10. Cohen, A., Ivry, R., & Keele, S. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 17-30.
11. Curran, T. (1997). Effects of aging on implicit sequence learning: Accounting for sequence structure and explicit knowledge. Psychological Research, 60, 224-241.
12. Dean, C. M., & Shepherd, R. B. (1997). Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. Stroke, 28, 722-728.
13. Desrosiers, J., Boubonnais, D., Bravo, G., & Roy, P. M. (1996). Performance of the "unaffected" upper extremity of elderly stroke patients. Stroke, 27, 1564-1570.
14. Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 343-350.
15. Exner, C., Weniger, G., & Irle, E. (2001). Implicit and explicit memory after focal thalamic lesions. Neurology, 57, 2054-2063.
16. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). "Mini-Mental State": A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
17. Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Jaasko, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975). The post hemiplegic patient I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 7, 13-31.
18. Gómez-Beldarrainm, M., García-Moncó, J. C., Rubio, B., & Pascual-Leone, A. (1998). Effect of focal cerebellar lesions on procedural learning in the serial reaction time task. Experimental Brain Research, 120, 25-30.
19. Goschke, T., Friederici, A. D., Kotz, S. A., & van Kampen, A. (2001). Procedural learning in Broca's aphasia: Dissociation between the implicit acquisition of spatio-motor and phoneme sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, 13, 370-388.
20. Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., & Ivry, R. B. (1995). Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 497-510.
21. Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., & Ivry, R. B. (1998). Abstract and effector specific representations of motor sequences identified with PET. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 9420-9428.
22. Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Motor sequence learning with the nondominant hand: A PET functional imaging study. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 3690-3708.
23. Haaland, K. Y., & Harrington, D. L. (1994). Limb sequence deficits after left but not right hemispheric damage. Brain and Cognition, 24, 104-122.
24. Hallett, M. (2001). Plasticity of the human motor cortex and recovery from stroke. Brain Research Reviews, 36, 169-174.
25. Hanlon, R. E. (1996). Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 77, 811-815.
26. Hardy, L., Mullen, R., & Jones, G. (1996). Knowledge of conscious control of motor actions under stress. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 621-636.
27. Harrington, D. L., & Haaland, K. Y. (1992). Motor sequencing with left hemiparesis: A pilot study. Brain, 115, 857-874.
28. Hodges, N. J., & Lee, T. D. (1999). The role of augmented information prior to learning a bimanual visual-motor coordination task: Do instructions of the movement pattern facilitate learning relative to discovery learning? British Journal of Psychology, 90, 389-403.
29. Holbrook, M., & Skilbeck, C. E. (1983). An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and Ageing, 12, 166-170.
30. Honda, M., Deiber, M-P., Ibáňez, V., Pascual-Leone, A., Zhuang, P., & Hallett, M. (1998). Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit and explicit sequence learning. Brain, 121, 2159-2173.
31. Howard, D. V., Howard Jr., J. H., Japikse, K., DiYanni, C., Thompson, A., & Somberg, R. (2004). Implicit sequence learning: Effects of level of structure, adult age, and extended practice. Psychology and Aging, 19, 79-92.
32. Howel, D. C. (1997). Statistical methods for psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxberry Press.
33. Jiménez, L., & Méndez, C. (1999). Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 25, 236-259.
34. Keele, S. W., Jennings, P., Jones, S., Caulton, D., & Cohen, A. (1995). On the modularity of sequence representation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 17-30.
35. Knopman, D. S., & Nissen, M. J. (1991). Procedural learning is impaired in Huntington's disease: Evidence from the serial reaction time task. Neuropsychologia, 29, 245-254.
36. Lee, D., & Quessy, S. (2003). Activity in the supplementary motor area related to learning and performance during a sequential visuomotor task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 1039-1056.
37. Levin, M. F. (1996). Interjoint coordination during pointing movements is disrupted in spastic hemiparesis. Brain, 119, 281-293.
38. Liao, C.-M., & Masters, R. S. W. (2001). Analogy learning: A means to implicit motor learning. Journal of Sport Sciences, 19, 307-319.
39. Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61-65.
40. Masters, R. S. W. (1992). Knowledge, knerves and know-how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 343-358.
41. Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R. S. W., & Eves, F. F. (2000). From novice to knowhow: A longitudinal study of implicit motor learning. Journal of Sport Sciences, 18, 111-120.
42. Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R. S. W., Kerr, E., & Weedon, E. (2001). The implicit benefit of learning without errors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1049-1058.
43. Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirement of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-32.
44. Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264-275.
45. Platz, T., Bock, S., & Prass, T. (2001). Reduced skilfulness of arm behaviour among motor stroke patients with good clinical recovery: Does it indicate reduced automaticity? Can it be improved by unilateral or bilateral training? A kinematic motion analysis study. Neuropsychologia, 39, 687-698.
46. Pohl, P. S., McDowd, J. M., Filion, D. L., Richards, L. G., & Stiers, W. (2001). Implicit learning of a perceptual-motor skill after stroke. Physical Therapy, 81, 1780-1789.
47. Seidler, R. D., Purushotham, A., Kim, S.-G., Ugurbil, K., Willingham, D. B., & Ashe, J. (2005). Neural correlates of encoding and expression in sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 165, 114-124.
48. Shin, J. C., Aparicio, P., & Ivry, R. B. (2005). Multidimensional sequence learning in patients with focal basal ganglia lesions. Brain and Cognition, 58, 75-83.
49. Stadler, M. A. (1995). Role of attention in implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 674-685.
50. State University of New York at Buffalo (1993). Guide for the uniform data set for medical rehabilitation (Adult FIM) version 4.0. Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
51. Sunderland, A. (2000). Recovery of ipsilateral dexterity after stroke. Stroke, 31, 430-433.
52. Sunderland, A., Bowers, M. P., Sluman, S.-M., Wilcock, D. J., & Ardon, M. E. (1999). Impaired dexterity of the ipsilateral hand after stroke and the relationship to cognitive deficit. Stroke, 30, 949-955.
53. Toni, I., Krams, M., Turner, R., & Passingham, R. E. (1998). The time course of changes during motor sequence learning: A whole-brain fMRI study. Neuroimage, 8, 50-61.
54. Trombly, C. A. (1992). Deficits in reaching in subjects with left hemiparesis: A pilot study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 887-897.
55. Vakil, E., Kahan, S., Huberman, M., & Osimani, A. (2000). Motor and non-motor sequence learning in patients with basal ganglia lesions in the case of the serial reaction time (SRT). Neuropsychologia, 38, 1-10.
56. Welford, A. T. (1976). Skilled performance: Perceptual and motor skills. Glenview, IL: Scott and Foresman.
57. Willingham, D. B., Wells, L. A., Farrell, J. M., & Stemwedel, M. E. (2000). Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations. Memory and Cognition, 28, 366-375.
58. Winstein, C. J., Merians, A. S., & Sullivan, K. J. (1999). Motor learning after unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia, 37, 975-987.
59. Winstein, C. J., & Pohl, P. S. (1995). Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements. Experimental Brain Research, 105, 163-174.
60. Wulf, G., & Weigelt, C. (1997). Instructions about physical principals in learning a complex motor skill: To tell or not to tell. . . Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 362-367.