Industry-university IP relations: Integrating perspectives and policy solutions

IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 257-267

  Jelinek, Mariann ^a   Markham, Stephen ^b  

^a The College of William and Mary   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Commercializing university technology; Industry university relations; IP policy; University links

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

COMMERCIALIZING UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY; INDUSTRY-UNIVERSITY RELATIONS; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY; UNIVERSITY LINKS;

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY;

EID: 34247624005     PISSN: 00189391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2007.893988     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Science and Engineering Indicators - 2000. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 2000.
2. Science and Engineering Indicators - 2002 2002, National_Science_Board.
3. Science and Engineering Indicators - 2004 2004, National_Science_Board.
4. D. E. Stokes, Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Inst. Press, 1997.
5. M. Kenny, Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press, 2000, xviii + 285.
6. D. C. Mowery and N. Rosenberg, Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th-Century America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998, p. x and 214.
7. D. A. Hounshell and J. K. Smith, Science and Corporate Strategy: Du Pont R & D 1902-1980. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988, p. xx and 756.
8. A. D. Chandler, Jr. and S. Salsbury, Pierre S. Du Pont and the Making of the Modern Corporation. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.
9. Endless Frontiers: Limited Resources: U.S. R&D Policy for Competitiveness. Washington, D.C.: Council on Competitiveness, 1996.
10. D. Mowery, "The changing structure of the U.S. national innovation system: Implications for international conflict and cooperation in R&D policy," Res. Policy, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 639-654, 1998.
11. B. Hall, A. Link, and J. Scott, "Barriers inhibiting industry from partnership with universities: Evidence from the advanced technology program," J. Technol. Transfer, vol. 26, pp. 87-98, 2001.
12. D. Bok, Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 2003.
13. S. Slaughter and G. Rhoades, Academic Capitalism and the New Economy Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2004, xiv + 370.
14. "Innovation's golden goose," Economist 2002, p. 3.
15. A. B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg, Patents, Citations & Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002, p. xviii and 478.
16. D. C. Mowery, M. Kenny and B. Kogut, Eds., "Ivory tower and industrial innovation: University-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole act," in Innovation and Technology in the World Economy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press, 2004, xvi + 241.
17. R. Jensen and M. Thursby, "Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions," Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 240-259, 2001.
18. J. G. Thursby and M. Thursby, "Who is selling the ivory tower? sources of growth in university licensing," Manage. Sci., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 90-104, 2002.
19. D. C. Mowery and B. N. Sampat, "University patents and patent policy debates in the USA 1925-1980," Ind. Corp. Change, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 781-814, 2001.
20. M. Feldman, "Commercializing Cohen-Boyer: Recombinant DNA as general purpose technology," in Proc. Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics (DRUID) Summer Conference 2004: Industrial Dynamics, Innovation and Development, Helsingør, Denmark, 2004.
21. C. Rauber, "$200 M patent runs out: UCSF and stanford scramble to replenish looming loss of income," San Francisco Bus. Times, pp. 1-4, 1997.
22. R. Henderson, A. B. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg, "Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988," in Patents, Citations & Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy, A. B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg, Eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002, pp. 237-259.
23. N. L. Deitch, "The Sarnoff corporation," in Secretary of Defense Washington, D.C., 2004, p. 37.
24. R. G. Cooper, "Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products," Bus. Horizons, pp. 44-54, May-Jun. 1990.
25. P. Koen, Providing Clarity and a Common Language to the "Fuzzy Front End". Washington, D.C.: Ind. Res. Inst., 2001, pp. 46-55.
26. D. G. Reinertsen, "Taking the fuzziness out of the fuzzy front end," Res. Technol. Manage., vol. 42, pp. 25-31, Dec. 1999.
27. N. Rosenberg, Technology and Uncertainty. Tokyo, Japan: UN University, 2000.
28. N. Rosenberg, Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994.
29. N. Rosenberg and R. R. Nelson, "American universities and technical advance in industry," Res. Policy, vol. 23, pp. 323-348, 1994.
30. V. Bush, Science - The Endless Frontier. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation, 1950.
31. K. Ku, "Effects of patenting and technology transfer on commercialization," in National Academies Board on Science, Technology and Economic Policy Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Washington, DC, Apr. 17, 2001, Workshop on Academic IP: Effects of University Patenting and Licensing on Commercialization and Research, Research, Editor. 2001.
32. L. Pressman, "AUTM licensing survey: FY 2000," in AUTM Licensing Survey. Northbrook, IL: Assoc. Univ. Technol. Managers, 2000.
33. J. Thursby and M. Thursby, "Inudstry perspectives on licensing university technologies: Sources and problems," J. Assoc. Univ. Technol. Managers, vol. 12, pp. 9-21, 2000.
34. S. Shane, S. Venkataraman, Ed., "Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation," in New Horizons in Entrepreneurship. Northampton, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 2004, p. xii and 335.
35. S. Markham, "The university's role in creating radically new products," Int. J. Technol. Transfer Commercialization, vol. 1, no. 1-2, pp. 163-172, 2002.
36. J. Thursby, R. Jensen, and M. Thursby, "Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities," J. Technol. Transfer, vol. 26, pp. 59-72, 2001.
37. J. Thursby and M. Thursby, "Industry/university licensing: Characteristics, concerns and issues from the perspective of the buyer," J. Technol. Transfer, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 207-213, 2003.
38. D. Siegel, "Organizational issues in university-industry technology transfer: An overview of the symposium issue," J. Technol. Transfer vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 5-11, 2001.
39. A. Strauss, Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998.
40. "Proceedings from a workshop on university intellectual property," in Proc. Workshop University Intellectual Property, Raleigh, NC, 2000.
41. M. Allen, "A review of the best practices in university technology licensing offices," J. Assoc. Univ. Technol. Managers, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57-69, 2001.
42. A. Agrawal and R. Henderson, "Putting patents in context; exploring knowledge transfer from MIT," Manage. Sci., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 44-60, 2002.
43. L. G. Zucker, M. R. Darby, and J. S. Armstrong, "Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture and firm performance in biotechnology," Manage. Sci., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 138-153, 2002.
44. P. Weeks, AUTM President's Message 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.autm.net/index_ie.html, cited 2003 Sep. 19
45. F. T. Janis, "Technology transfer: Emerging issues "High impact trends"," J. Technol. Transfer, vol. 28, no. 3-4, pp. 241-249, 2003.
46. J. Burrington, "University-industry cooperation: A framework for dialogue," Int. J. Technol. Manage., vol. 8, no. 6,7,8, pp. 440-446, 1993.
47. A. B. Jaffe and J. Lerner, Innovation and its Discontents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 2004.
48. L. Lessig, The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York: Vintage Press/Random House, 2002.