Using UCODE_2005 and PHREEQC to determine thermodynamic constants from experimental data

Ground Water

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 368-373

  Skold, Magnus E ^a   Thyne, Geoffrey D ^b   McCray, John E ^b  

^a ARCADIS   (United States)

^b Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; RATE CONSTANTS; REMEDIATION; STATISTICAL METHODS;

CONDITIONAL STABILITY CONSTANT; THERMODYNAMIC CONSTANTS; THERMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS;

THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES;

ESTIMATION METHOD; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; LEAD; REMEDIATION; SOFTWARE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMICS;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; THEORETICAL MODEL; THERMODYNAMICS; WATER FLOW; WATER POLLUTANT;

MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SOFTWARE; THERMODYNAMICS; WATER MOVEMENTS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 34247617222     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00303.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Allison, J.D., D.S. Brown, and K.J. Novac-Gradac. 1991. MINTEQA2/PRODEFA2, a geochemical assessment model for environmental systems: Version 3.0 user's manual. EPA/600/3-91/021. Athens, Georgia: U.S. EPA.
2. Banta, E.R., E.P. Poeter, J.E. Doherty, and M.C. Hill. 2006. JUPITER: Joint Universal Parameter IdenTification and Evaluation of Reliability-An application programming interface (API) for model analysis. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, 06-E1. http://water.usgs.gov/nrp/gwsoftware/ jupiter/jupiter_api.html
3. Bethke, C.M. 1996. Geochemical Reaction Modeling-Concepts and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Boving, T.B., and J.E. McCray. 2000. Cyclodextrin-enhanced remediation of organic and metal contaminants in porous media and groundwater. Remediation 10, 59-83.
5. Doherty, J. 2004. PEST Model-Independent Parameter Estimation. User Manual (5th ed). Corinda, Australia: Watermark Numerical Computing.
6. Herbelin, A.L., and J.C. Westall. 1999. FITEQL 4.0: A computer program for determination of chemical equilibrium constants from experimental data. Report 99-01. Corvallis, Oregon: Department of Chemistry, Oregon State University.
7. Hill, M.C., and C.R. Tiedeman. 2006. Effective Groundwater Model Calibration, with Analysis of Sensitivities, Predictions, and Uncertainty. New York: Wiley and Sons.
8. Parkhurst, D., and C.A.J. Appelo. 1999. User's guide to PHREEQC (version 2)-A computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport and inverse geochemical calculations. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4259. Reston, Virginia: USGS.
9. Poeter, E.P., and D. Anderson. 2005. Multimodel ranking and inference in ground water modeling. Ground Water 43, no. 4: 597-605.
10. Poeter, E.P., and M.C. Hill. 1998. Documentation of UCODE, a computer code for universal inverse modeling. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4080. Reston, Virginia: USGS.
11. Poeter, E.P., M.C. Hill, E.R. Banta, S. Mehl, and S. Christensen. 2005. UCODE_2005 and six other computer codes for universal sensitivity analysis, calibration, and uncertainty evaluation. USGS Techniques and Methods 6-A11. Reston, Virginia: USGS.
12. Skold, M.E. 2006. A complexation model to evaluate carboxymethyl-β- cyclodextrin (CMCD) for remediation of contaminated soil and ground water. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Geology and Geological Engineering: Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colarado.