What do parents want form their child's asthma treatment?

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 167-175

  Walzer, Stefan ^a  

^a Analytica International ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Discrete choice analysis; Health economics; Preference study; Utility

Indexed keywords

BUDESONIDE; FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE; FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE PLUS SALMETEROL; MONTELUKAST; ZAFIRLUKAST;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTHMA; CAREGIVER; CHILD CARE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COST OF ILLNESS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DISEASE DURATION; DISEASE EXACERBATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG COST; FEMALE; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PARENTAL BEHAVIOR; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RATING SCALE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SAMPLE SIZE; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 34247614476     PISSN: 11766336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.2007.3.1.167     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Adams PF, Marano MA. 1994. Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey. Vital Health Stat, 10(193 Pt 1):1-260.
2. Andersson F, Borg S, Stahl E. 2003. The impact of exacerbations on the asthmatic patient's preference scores. J Asthma, 40:615-23.
3. Balsbaugh TA, Chambers CV, Diamond JJ. 1999. Asthma controller medications: what do patients want? J Asthma, 36:591-6.
4. Ben-Akiva M, Lerman SR. 1985. Discrete choice analysis. Cambridge, London: MIT Pr.
5. [CDC] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2000. Measuring childhood asthma prevalence before and after the 1997 redesign of the National Health Interview Survey-United States. MWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 49:908-11.
6. de Jongste JC, Janssens HM, Van der Wouden J. 2002. Effectiveness of pharmacotherapy in asthmatic preschool children. Allergy, 57(Suppl 74):42-7.
7. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al. 2005. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford, New York. Oxford Univ Pr.
8. Gibson NA, Ferguson AE, Aitchison TC. 1995. Compliance with inhaled asthma medication in preschool children. Thorax, 50:274-9.
9. Green PE, Rao V. 1971. Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Marketing Res, 8:355-63.
10. Johansson Q Ställberg B, Tornling G, et al. 2004. Asthma treatment preference study: A conjoint analysis of preferred drug treatments. Chest, 125:916-23.
11. Louviere, JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD. 2000. Stated choice methods - analysis and application. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Pr.
12. Mitchell RC, Carson RT. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods, the Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
13. Moy ML, Fuhlbrigge AL, Blumenschein K, et al. 2004. Association between preference-based health-related quality of life and asthma severity. Ann Allergy Asthma Inummol, 92:329-34.
14. [NHDS] National Hospital Discharge Survey. 1995. Annual summary 1993. Vital Health Stat, 13(121):1-63.
15. Osman LM, McKenzie L, Cairns J, et al. 2001. Patient weighting of Importance of asthma symptoms. Thorax, 56:138-42
16. Pauwels RA, Lofdahl CG, Postma DS, et al. 1997. Effect of inhaled formoterol and budesonide on exacerbations of asthma. Formoterol and Corticosteroids Establishing Therapy (FACET) International Study Group. N Engl J Med, 37:1405-11.
17. Ratcliffe J, Buxton M. 1999. Patients' preferences regarding the process and outcomes of life-saving technology. An application of conjoint analysis to liver transplantation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 15:340-51.
18. Ryan M, Hughes J. 1997. Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. Health Econ, 6(3):261-73.
19. Ryan M. 1996. Using consumer preferences in health care decision making: the application of conjoint analysis; Office of Health Economics. Luton, Bedfordshire, UK: White Crescent Pr.
20. Ryan M. 1999. Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient's preferences and go beyond health outcomes. An application to invitro fertilisation. Soc Sci Med, 48:535-46.
21. Srinivasan V, Shocker AD. 1973. Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences. Psychometrika, 38(3):337-69.
22. Szeinbach SL, Barnes JH, McGhan WF, et al. Using conjoint analysis to evaluate health state preferences. Drug Inf J, 33:849-58.
23. Taylor WR, Newacheck PW. 1992. Impact of childhood asthma on health. Pediatrics, 90(5):657-62.
24. Vose D. 2001. Risk analysis: A quantitative guide. 2nd ed. Chichester, New York, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.
25. Walzer S, Zweifel P. 2007. Willingness-to-pay for caregivers of children with asthma or wheezing conditions. Ther Clin Risk Manage, 3: xx-xx.
26. Weiss KB, Gergen PJ, Hodgson TA. 1992. An economic evaluation of asthma in the United States. N Engl J Med, 326:862-6.sds