Rethinking the Great Divide: Long-Term Structural History and the Temporality of Event

Norwegian Archaeological Review

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 88-101

  Harding, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247609312     PISSN: 00293652     EISSN: 15027678     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00293650510032707     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adam, B., 1990. Time and Social Theory, Cambridge:Polity Press.
2. Althusser, L., and Balibar, E., 1970. Reading Capital, London:New Left Books.
3. Archer, M., 1988. Culture and Agency, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
4. Bailey, G., 1981. “Concepts, time-scales and explanations in economic prehistory.”. In Economic Archaeology:towards an integration of ecological and social approaches, Edited by:Sheridan, A, and Bailey, G. 97–117. Oxford:British Archaeological Reports International Series 96.
5. Bailey, G., 1983. Concepts of time in Quaternary prehistory. Annual Review of Anthropology, 12:165–192.
6. Bailey, G., 1987. Breaking the time barrier. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 6(1):6–20.
7. Barnes, R., 1974. Kédang, Oxford:Clarendon.
8. Barrett, J., 1994. Fragments from Antiquity, Oxford:Blackwell.
9. Bintliff, J., 1991. “The contribution of an Annaliste/structural history approach to archaeology.”. In The Annales School and Archaeology, Edited by:Bintliff, J. 1–33. London & New York:Leicester University Press.
10. Bintliff, J., 1999. “Structure, contingency, narrative and timelessness.”. In Structure and Contingency:Evolutionary Processes in Life and Human Society, Edited by:Bintliff, J. 132–148. London & New York:Leicester University Press.
11. Bintliff, J., 2004. “Time, structure and agency:the Annales, emergent complexity and archaeology.”. In The Blackwell Companion to Archaeology, Edited by:Bintliff, J. L. Oxford:Blackwell.
12. Bloch, M., 1977. The past in the present and the past. Man, 12:278–292.
13. Bloch, M., and Parry, S., 1982. “Introduction:death and the regeneration of life.”. In Death and the Regeneration of Life, Edited by:Bloch, M, and Parry, S. 1–44. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
14. Boyd, R., and Richerson, M., 1985. Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
15. Bradley, R., 2002. The Past in Prehistoric Society, London & New York:Routledge.
16. Braudel, F., 1972. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Phillip II, London:Collins. (translated S. Reynolds)
17. Bulliet, R. W., 1992. “Annales and archaeology.”. In Archaeology, Annales, and Ethnohistory, Edited by:Knapp, A. B. 131–134. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
18. Burke, P., 1990. The French Historical Revolution:the Annales School 1929–89, Cambridge:Polity Press.
19. Clark, G., 1994. Space, Time and Man:a Prehistorian’s View, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
20. Clark, S., 1985. “The Annales historians.”. In The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences, Edited by:Skinner, Q. 177–198. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
21. Connerton, P., 1989. How Societies Remember, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
22. Dietler, M., and Herbich, I., 1993. Living on Luo time:reckoning sequence, duration, history and biography in a rural African society. World Archaeology, 25:248–260.
23. Durkheim, E., 1965. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, New York:The Free Press. (translated by J.W. Swain)
24. Fletcher, R., 1992. “Time perspectivism, Annales, and the potential of archaeology.”. In Archaeology, Annales, and Ethnohistory, Edited by:Knapp, A. B. 35–49. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
25. Furet, F., 1983. Beyond the Annales. Journal of Modern History, 55:389–410.
26. Gell, A., 1992. The Anthropology of Time:Cultural Constructions of Temporal Maps and Images, Oxford:Berg.
27. Giddens, A., 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory, London:Macmillan.
28. Giddens, A., 1984. The Constitution of Society, Cambridge:Polity Press.
29. Gledhill, J., and Rowlands, M. J., 1982. “Materialism and socio-economic process in multilinear evolution.”. In Ranking, Resource and Exchange, Edited by:Renfrew, C, and Shennan, S. 144–149. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
30. Gosden, C., 1994. Social Being and Time, Oxford:Blackwell.
31. Gosden, C., and Lock, G., 1998. Prehistoric histories. World Archaeology, 30:2–12.
32. Gould, S. J., 1999. “The scales of contingency and punctuation.”. In Structure and Contingency:Evolutionary Processes in Life and Human Society, Edited by:Bintliff, J. ix-xxii. London & New York:Leicester University Press.
33. Hexter, J. H., 1972. Fernand Braudel and the monde Braudellien. Journal of Modern History, 44:480–539.
34. Hodder, I., 1987. “The contribution of the long-term.”. In The Archaeology of the Long Term, Edited by:Hodder, I. 1–8. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
35. Hodder, I., 1990. The Domestication of Europe, Oxford:Blackwell.
36. Hodder, I., 1999. The Archaeological Process:an Introduction, Oxford:Blackwell.
37. Howe, L., 1981. The social determination of knowledge:Maurice Bloch and Balinese time. Man, 16:220–234.
38. Husserl, E., 1996 (1887). The Phenomenology of Internal Time Consciousness, Bloomington, Indiana:Midland Books.
39. Ingold, T., 1986. Evolution and Social Life, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
40. Ingold, T., 1993. The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology, 25:152–174.
41. Johnson, M., 1989. Conceptions of agency in archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 8:189–211.
42. Karlsson, H. (ed.)., 2001. It’s About Time:the Concept of Time in Archaeology, Göteborg:Bricoleur Press.
43. Kinser, S., 1981. Annaliste paradigm? The geohistorical structuralism of Fernand Braudel. The American Historical Review, 86:63–105.
44. Knapp, A. B., 1992. “Archaeology and Annales:time, space, and change.”. In Archaeology, Annales, and Ethnohistory, Edited by:Knapp, A. B. 1–21. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
45. Le Roy Ladurie, E., 1974. The Peasants of Languedoc, Urbana:University of Illinois Press. (translated by John Day)
46. Le Roy Ladurie, E., 1979. “The ‘event’ and the ‘long term’ in social history:the case of the Chouan uprising. Reprinted in Le Roy Ladurie, E.”. In The Territory of the Historian, 111–131. Hassocks, Sussex:Harvester Press Ltd & University of Chicago Press. (translated by Siân Reynolds and Ben Reynolds)
47. Le Roy Ladurie, E., 1981. The Mind and Method of the Historian, Chicago:University of Chicago Press. (translated by Siân Reynolds and Ben Reynolds)
48. Leach, E., 1961. Rethinking Anthropology, London:Athlone Press.
49. Lévi-Strauss, C., 1966. The Savage Mind, London:Weidenfield and Nicolson.
50. Lewthwaite, J. G., 1987. “The Braudelian beaker:a Chalcolithic conjuncture.”. In Bell Beakers of the Western Mediterranean:Definition, Interpretation, Theory and New Site Data, Part I, Edited by:Waldren, W. H, and Kennard, R. C. 31–60. Oxford:British Archaeological Reports International Series 331(i).
51. Munn, N. D., 1992. The cultural anthropology of time:a critical essay. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21:93–123.
52. Murray, T., 1999. Time and Archaeology, London & New York:Routledge One World Archaeology 37.
53. Olivier, L., 1999. “The Hochdorf ‘princely’ grave and the question of the nature of archaeological funerary assemblages.”. In Time and Archaeology, Edited by:Murray, T. London & New York:Routledge.
54. Peebles, C. S., 1991. “Annalistes, hermeneutics and positivists:squaring circles or dissolving problems.”. In The Annales School and Archaeology, Edited by:Bintliff, J. 108–124. London & New York:Leicester University Press.
55. Renfrew, C., 1973. “Monuments, mobilisation and social organisation in Neolithic Wessex.”. In The Explanation of Cultural Change, Edited by:Renfrew, C. 539–558. London:Duckworth.
56. Ricoeur, P., 1984. Time and Narrative, Vol. 1, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
57. Ricoeur, P., 1985. Time and Narrative, Vol. 2, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
58. Ricoeur, P., 1988. Time and Narrative, Vol. 3, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
59. Sahlins, M., 1985. Islands of History, London & Mew York:Tavistock Publications.
60. Shanks, M., and Tilley, C., 1987. Social Theory and Archaeology, Cambridge:Polity Press.
61. Shennan, S. J., 1982. “Ideology, change and the European Early Bronze Age.”. In Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, Edited by:Hodder, I. 155–161. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
62. Sherratt, A., 1992. “What can archaeologists learn from Annalistes.”. In Archaeology, Annales, and Ethnohistory, Edited by:Knapp, A. B. 135–142. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
63. Smith, M. E., 1992. “Braudel’s temporal rhythms and chronology theory in archaeology.”. In Archaeology, Annales, and Ethnohistory, Edited by:Knapp, A. B. 23–34. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
64. Thomas, J., 1996. Time, Culture and Identity:an Interpretive Archaeology, London:Routledge.
65. Thorpe, I. J., and Richards, C., 1984. “The decline of ritual authority and the introduction of beakers into Britain.”. In Neolithic Studies:a Review of Some Current Research, Edited by:Bradley, R. J, and Gardiner, J. 67–84. Oxford:British Archaeological Reports British Series 133.