On the construction of manufactured solutions for one and two-equation eddy-viscosity models

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 119-154

  Eca L ^a   Hoesktra, M ^b   Hay, A ^c   Pelletier, D ^c  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^b MARIN   (Netherlands)

^c ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Code verification; Eddy viscosity; Manufactured solutions; Turbulence models

Indexed keywords

INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STEADY FLOW; TURBULENT FLOW; VISCOSITY; WALL FLOW;

CODE VERIFICATION; EDDY-VISCOSITY; MANUFACTURED SOLUTION;

TURBULENCE MODELS;

INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STEADY FLOW; TURBULENCE MODELS; TURBULENT FLOW; VISCOSITY; WALL FLOW;

EID: 34247605401     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1387     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Pelletier D, Roache PJ. CFD code verification and the method of the manufactured solutions. 10th Annual Conference of the CFD Society of Canada, Windsor, Ont., Canada, June 2002.
2. Oberkampf WL, Blottner FG, Aeschliman DP. Methodology for computational fluid dynamics code verification/validation. AIAA 26th Fluid Dynamics Conference, AIAA Paper 95-2226, San Diego, CA, June 1995.
3. Roache PJ. Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering. Hermosa Publishers: Albuquerque, NM, U.S.A., 1998.
4. Turgeon É, Pelletier D. Verification and validation of adaptive finite element method for impingement heat transfer. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer 2001; 15:284-292.
5. Turgeon É, Pelletier D. Verification and validation in CFD using an adaptive finite element method. Canadian Aeronautic and Space Journal 2002; 48:219-231.
6. Knupp P, Salari K. Verification of Computer Codes in Computational Science and Engineering. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2002.
7. Roache PJ. Code verification by the method of the manufactured solutions. Journal of Fluids Engineering (ASME) 2002; 114:4-10.
8. Eça L, Hoekstra M, Hay A, Pelletier D. A manufactured solution for a two-dimensional steady wall-bounded incompressible turbulent flow. IST Report D72-34, EPM Report EMP-RT-2005-08, November 2005.
9. Spalart PR, Allmaras SR. A one-equations turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, January 1992.
10. Menter FR. Eddy-viscosity transport equations and their relation to the κ-ε model. Journal of Fluids Engineering 1997; 119:876-884.
11. Launder BE, Spalding DB. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1974; 3:269-289.
12. Chien KY. Prediction of channel and boundary-layer flows with a low-Reynolds-number turbulence model. AIAA Journal 1982; 20:33-38.
13. Kok JC. Resolving the dependence on free-stream values for the κ-ω turbulence model. NLR-TP-99295, 1999.
14. Menter FR. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal 1994; 32:1598-1605.
15. José MQB Jacob, Eça L. 2-D incompressible steady flow calculations with a fully coupled method. VI Congresso Nacional de Mecânica Aplicada e Computacional, Aveiro, April 2000.
16. Eça L. Calculation of a manufactured solution for a 2-D steady incompressible near-wall turbulent flow with PARNASSOS. IST Report D72-35, January 2006.
17. Saad Y, Schultz MH. GMRES: a generalized minimum residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM Journal on Science and Statistical Computation 1986; 7:856-869.
18. Eça L, Hoekstra M, Hay A, Pelletier D. Manufactured solutions for one-equation turbulence models in a two-dimensional steady wall-bounded incompressible turbulent flow. IST Report D72-36, EPM Report EMP-RT-2006-02, February 2006.
19. Vinokur M. On one-dimensional stretching functions for finite-difference calculations. Journal of Computational Physics 1983; 50:215-234.
20. Eça L, Hoekstra M. An evaluation of verification procedures for CFD applications. 24th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Fukuoka, Japan, July 2002.
21. Wilcox DC. Turbulence Modeling for CFD (2nd edn). DCW Industries: March 2000.
22. Eça L, Hoekstra M. On the influence of the iterative error in the numerical uncertainty of ship viscous flow calculations. 26th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Rome, Italy, September 2006.
23. Eça L, Hoekstra M. On the grid sensitivity of the wall boundary condition of the κ-ω model. Journal of Fluids Engineering 2004; 126(6):900-910.