Education for sustainable development in initial teacher training: issues for interdisciplinary collaboration

Environmental Education Research

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 623-647

  Summers, Mike ^a   Childs, Ann ^a   Corney, Graham ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247603784     PISSN: 13504622     EISSN: 14695871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504620500169841     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ali Khan, S., and Sterling, S., 1998. Sustainable development education: teacher education specification, London: Education for Sustainable Development Panel.
2. Björneloo, I., 2004. From straight answers to complex questions: a study of premises for learning for sustainable development, Göteborg: Göteborg University.
3. Bonnett, M., 1999. Education for sustainable development: a coherent philosophy for environmental education?. Cambridge Journal of Education, 29: 313–324.
4. Corney, G., Childs, A., and Summers, M., submitted. “ Education for sustainable development in initial teacher education: are mentors prepared? ”.
5. Council for Environmental Education. 1998. Education for sustainable development in the schools sector: a report to DfEE/QCA from the Panel for Education for Sustainable Development, Reading: Council for Environmental Education.
6. Cross, R., 1998. Teachers’ views about what to do about sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 4: 41–52.
7. Department for Education and Employment. 1999. The National Curriculum: handbook for secondary teachers in England, London: DfEE.
8. Dunne, R., and Harvard, G., 1993. “ A model of teaching and its implications for mentoring ”. In Mentoring: perspectives on school-based teacher education, Edited by: McIntyre, D., Hagger, H., and Wilkin, M., London: Kogan Page.
9. Edman, S., 2004. “ Thoughts at the foot of a tree ”. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Science. Article number U04.007 written for Learning to change our world, an international consultation on education for sustainable development
10. Gehrke, N., 1998. A look at curriculum integration from the bridge. The Curriculum Journal, 9: 247–260.
11. Gough, S., 2002. Increasing the value of the environment: a ‘real options’ metaphor for learning. Environmental Education Research, 8: 61–72.
12. Halstead, J., and Taylor, M., eds. 1996. Values in education and education in values, London: Falmer Press.
13. Hopkins, C., Damlamian, J., and López Ospina, G., 1996. “ Evolving towards education for sustainable development: an international perspective ”. In Key issues in sustainable development and learning, Edited by: Scott, W., and Gough, S., London: RoutledgeFalmer.
14. Huckle, J., 2003. Education for sustainable development: a briefing paper for the TTA (available from the author)
15. Jickling, R., 2004. “ Why I don’t want my children educated for sustainable development ”. In Key issues in sustainable development and learning, Edited by: Scott, W., and Gough, S., London: RoutledgeFalmer.
16. Kysilka, M., 1998. Understanding integrated curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 9: 197–209.
17. Levinson, R., and Turner, S., 2002. Valuable lessons: engaging with the social context of science in schools The Wellcome Trust. Available online at: www.wellcome.ac.uk/assets/wtd003446.pdf (accessed 18 March 2005)
18. Luke, T., 2001. Education, environment and sustainability: what are the issues, where to intervene, what must be done?. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 33: 187–202.
19. Moray House School of Education & University of Edinburgh. 2004. Educating for a sustainable future Available online at: www.education.ed.ac.uk/esf/index.html (accessed 18 March 2005).
20. Office for Standards in Education. 2003. Taking the first step forward: towards an education for sustainable development, London: Ofsted.
21. Oxfordshire County Council. 2002. The Oxfordshire schools sustainability project: consultation results from Oxfordshire schools for Oxfordshire schools, Oxford: Oxfordshire County Council.
22. Putnam, R., and Borko, H., 2000. “ What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? ”. In Leading professional development in education, Edited by: Moon, R., Butcher, J., and Bird, E., London: The Open University.
23. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. 2003. What are the key elements and characteristics of ESD?, London: QCA. Available online at: www.nc.uk.net/esd/gq3.htm (accessed 18 March 2005)
24. Rickinson, M., Curriculum conflicts in environmental geography: a taste of things to come?. paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, University of Edinburgh. September20–23.
25. Sauvé, L., 1996. Environmental education and sustainable development: a further appraisal. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 1: 7–35.
26. Scott, W., 2002. Sustainability and learning: what role for the curriculum? Inaugural lecture, University of Bath. Available online at: www.bath.ac.uk/cree/scott.htm (accessed 18 March 2005)
27. Scott, W., and Reid, A., 2001. Exploring our responsibilities. Environmental Education,: 23–24.
28. Stradling, R., Noctor, M., and Baines, B., 1984. Teaching controversial issues, London: Edward Arnold.
29. Summers, M., Corney, G., and Childs, A., 2004. Student teachers’ conceptions of sustainable development: the starting points of geographers and scientists. Educational Research, 46: 163–182.
30. Sustainable Development Education Panel. 2000. Sustainable development education surveys Available online at: www.defra.gov.uk/environment/sustainable/educpanel/educationsurveys/index.htm (accessed 18 March 2005)
31. Sustainable Development Education Panel. 2003. Learning to last Available online at: www.defra.gov.uk/environment/ sustainable/educpanel/pdf/sdeduc_draftstrat.pdf (accessed 18 March 2005).
32. UNESCO. 2002. Teaching and Learning for a Sustainable Future: a multimedia teacher education programme Available online at: www.unesco.org/education/tlsf (accessed 18 March 2005)
33. UNESCO. 2004. United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: draft international implementation scheme, Paris: UNESCO. Available online at: http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID=36026&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html (accessed 18 March 2005)
34. Venville, G., Wallace, J., Rennie, L., and Malone, J., 2002. Curriculum integration: eroding the high ground of science as a school subject. Studies in Science Education, 37: 43–84.
35. Whitty, G., Aggleton, P., and Rowe, G., 1996. “ Competing conceptions of quality in social education: learning from experiences of cross-curricular themes ”. In Teaching and learning in changing times, Edited by: Hughes, M., Oxford: Blackwell.