Adaptation of neuromagnetic N1 without shifts in dipolar orientation

NeuroReport

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 377-380

  Campbell, Tom ^a,b   Neuvonen, Tuomas ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Cortical adaptation; Human auditory cortex; Magnetoencephalography; N1mresponse

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPOLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TEMPORAL LOBE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; ORIENTATION;

EID: 34247597266     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32801b3ce8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Jääskeläinen IP, Ahveninen J, Bonmassar G, Dale AM, Ilmoniemi RJ, Levänen S, et al. Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:6809-6814.
2. Ulanovsky N, Las L, Farkas D, Nelken I. Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons. J Neurosci 2004; 24:10440-10453.
3. Hari R, Kaila K, Katila T, Tuomisto T, Varpula T. Interstimulus-interval dependence of the auditory vertex response and its magnetic counterpart: implications for their neural generation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982; 54:561-569.
4. Campbell TA, Winkler I, Kujala T, Näätänen R. The N1 hypothesis and irrelevant sound: evidence from token set effects. Cogn Brain Res 2003; 18:39-47.
5. Campbell TA, Winkler I, Kujala T. Disruption of immediate memory and brain processes: an auditory ERP protocol. Brain Res Protoc 2005; 14:77-86.
6. Campbell TA, Beaman CP, Berry DC. Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: further evidence for changing-state disruption. Memory 2002; 10:199-214.
7. Jacobsen T, Schröger E. Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch? Psychophysiology 2001; 38:723-727.
8. Jacobsen T, Schröger E, Horenkamp T, Winkler I. Mismatch negativity to pitch change: varied stimulus proportions in controlling effects of neural refractoriness on human auditory event related brain potentials. Neurosci Lett 2003; 344:79-82.
9. Campbell TA, Beaman CP, Berry DC. Changing-state disruption of lip-reading by irrelevant sound in perceptual and memory tasks. Eur J Cogn Psychol 2002; 14:461-474.
10. Jääskelainen IP, Ojanen V, Ahveninen J, Auranen T, Levanen S, Möttönen R, et al. Adaptation of neuromagnetic N1 responses to phonetic stimuli by visual speech in humans. Neuroreport 2004; 15:2741-2744.
11. Alcaini M, Giard MH, Thévenet M, Pernier J. Two separate frontal components in the N1 wave of the human auditory-evoked response. Psychophysiology 1994; 31:611-615.
12. Giard MH, Perrin F, Echallier JF, Thevenet M, Froment JC, Pernier J. Dissociation of temporal and frontal components in the human auditory N1 wave: a scalp current density and dipole model analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 92:238-252.
13. Alcaini M, Giard MH, Echallier JF, Pernier J. Selective auditory attention effects in tonotopically-organized cortical areas; a topographic ERP study. Hum Brain Mapp 1995; 2:159-169.
14. Cansino S, Ducorps A, Ragot R. Tonotopic cortical representation of periodic complex sounds. Hum Brain Mapp 2003; 20:71-81.
15. Tesche CD, Uusitalo MA, Ilmoniemi RJ, Huotilainen M, Kajola M, Salonen O. Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 95:189-200.
16. Uusitalo MA, Ilmoniemi RJ. Signal-space projection method for separating MEG or EEG into components. Med Biol Eng Comput 1997; 35:135-140.
17. Shestakova A, Brattico E, Soloviev A, Klucharev V, Huotilainen M. Orderly cortical representation of vowel categories presented by multiple exemplars. Cogn Brain Res 2004; 21:342-350.
18. Neuromag Oy. Source modelling software user's guide software version 5.2.4; 2001.
19. Hall DA, Hart HC, Johnsrude IS. Relationships between human auditory cortical structure and function. Audiol Neuro-Otol 2003; 8:1-18.
20. Viceic D, Fornari E, Thiran J-P, Maeder PP, Meuli R, Adriani M, Clarke S. Human auditory belt areas specialized in sound recognition: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroreport 2006; 17:1659-1662.