Patients' perceptions of nurses' bedside use of PDAs

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 106-111

  Lee, Ting Ting ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Interviews; Patient perceptions; PDA; Qualitative study; Technology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING INFORMATICS; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING INFORMATICS; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING RECORDS; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS;

EID: 34247594317     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.NCN.0000263980.31178.bd     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Staniszewska S, Henderson L. Patients' evaluations of the quality of care: influencing factors and the importance of engagement. J Adv Nurs. 2005;49(5):530-537.
2. Staniszewska S, Henderson L. Patients evaluation of their healthcare: the expression of negative evaluation and the role of adaptive strategies. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;55(2):185-192.
3. McColl E, Thomas L, Bond S. A study to determine patient satisfaction with nursing care. Nurs Stand. 1996;10(52):34-38.
4. Schmidt L. Patients' perceptions of nursing care in the hospital setting. J Adv Nurs. 2003;44(4):393-399.
5. Thornett A. Computer use must not affect doctor-patient relationship. BMJ. 2001;322:1369.
6. Aydin CE, Anderson JG, Rosen PN, Felitti VJ, Weng HC. Computers in the consulting room: a case study of clinician and patient perspectives. Health Care Manag Sci. 1998;1:61-74.
7. Garrison GM, Bernard ME, Rasmussen NH. 21st century healthcare: the effect of computer use by physicians on patient satisfaction at a family medicine clinic. Fam Med. 2002;34(5):241-244.
8. Gadd CS, Penrod LE. Dichotomy between physicians' and patients' attitudes regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2000:275-279.
9. Houston TK, Ray MN, Crawford MA, Giddens T, Berner ES. Patient perceptions of physicians use of handheld computers. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003:299-303.
10. Nahm R, Poston I. Measurement of the effects of an integrated, point-of-care computer system on quality of nursing documentation and patient satisfaction. Comput Nurs. 2000;18(5):220-229.
11. Hughes RA. Clinical practice in a computer world: considering the issues. J Adv Nurs. 2003;42(4):340-346.
12. Pabst MK, Scherubel JC, Minnick AF. The impact of computerized documentation on nurses' use of time. Comput Nurs. 1996;14(1):25-30.
13. Tooey MJ, Mayo A. Handheld technologies in a clinical setting: state of the technology and resources. AACN Clin Issues. 2003;14(3):342-349.
14. Lewis JA, Sommers CO. Personal data assistants: using new technology to enhance nursing practice. MCN. 2003;28(2):66-71.
15. Stengel D, Bauwens K, Walter M, Kopfer T, Ekkernkamp A. Comparison of handheld computer-assisted and conventional paper chart documentation of medical records. A randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(3):533-560.
16. Mitchell E, Sullivan F. A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97. BMJ. 2001;322:279-282.
17. Jenkins DL. Protecting patient privacy in the age of instant access. Clin Nurse Spec. 2002;16(4):178-179.
18. Gallagher PM. Maintain privacy with electronic charting. Nurs Manage. 2004;35(2):16-17.
19. Pancoast PE, Patrick TB, Mitchell JA. Physician PDA use and the HIPAA privacy rule. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:611-612.
20. Robinson K. Technology can't replace compassion in Healthcare. Crit Care Choices. 2003;34(1):1.
21. Polit EF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Principles and Methods, 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
22. Kumar R. Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999.
23. Sandelowski M. The problem of rigor in qualitative research. ANS. 1986;8(3):27-37.
24. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
25. Miles MB, Huberman AM. An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
26. Rust JE, Tafflinger TA. Quality in your hands: using PDA technology for data collection. Clin Nurse Spec. 2004;18(4);175-177.
27. Rempher KJ, Lasome CE, Lasome TJ. Leveraging palm technology in the advanced practice nursing environment. AACN Clin Issues. 2003;14(3):363-370.
28. Conner VW. Patient confidentiality in the electronic age. J Intraven Nurs. 1999;22(4):199-202.
29. Woods D, Cardin S. Realizing your marketing influence. Part 2: marketing from the inside out. J Nurs Adm. 2002;32(6):323-330.
30. Breslin S, Greskovich W, Turisco F. Wireless technology improves nursing workflow and communications. Comput Inform Nurs. 2004;22(5):275-281.