Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis [2]

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 109, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1203-1204

  Alfirevic, Zarko ^a   Tabor, Ann ^b  

^a LIVERPOOL WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMNIOCENTESIS; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DOWN SYNDROME; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE BLOOD TRANSFUSION; LETTER; POST HOC ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING TEST; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION;

ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; ADULT; AMNIOCENTESIS; DOWN SYNDROME; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; NEEDLES; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, SECOND; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 34247590967     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000263773.19452.7d     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Eddleman KA, Malone FD, Sullivan L, Dukes K, Berkowitz RL, Kharbutli Y, et al. Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1067-72.
2. BMJ updates. Midtrimester amniocentesis is safer that we thought. BMJ 2006: 333:0. Available at http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/333/7579/0-e Retrieved March 15, 2007.
3. Tabor A, Philip J, Madsen M, Bang J, Obel EB, Norgaard-Pedersen B. Randomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women. Lancet 1986;1:1287-93.