Differentiation between post-menopausal women with and without hip fractures: Enhanced evaluation of clinical DXA by topological analysis of the mineral distribution in the scan images

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 779-787

  Boehm, H F ^a,b   Vogel, T ^a   Panteleon, A ^a   Burklein, D ^a   Bitterling, H ^a   Reiser, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bone mineral distribution; DXA; Fracture risk; In vivo; Proximal femur; Topology

Indexed keywords

AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE MINERAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POPULATION RESEARCH; POSTMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BONE DENSITY; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 34247589156     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0302-z     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Fitzpatrick P, Kirke PN, Daly L et al (2001) Predictors of first hip fracture and mortality post fracture in older women. Ir J Med Sci 170:49-53
2. Hreybe H, Salamoun M, Badra M et al (2004) Hip fractures in Lebanese patients: determinants and prognosis. J Clin Densitom 7:368-375
3. Pande I, Scott DL, O'Neill TW et al (2006) Quality of life, morbidity, and mortality after low trauma hip fracture in men. Ann Rheum Dis 65:87-92
4. Lang T, Augat P, Majumdar S et al (1998) Noninvasive assessment of bone density and structure using computed tomography and magnetic resonance. Bone 22:149S-153S
5. Krug R, Banerjee S, Han ET et al (2005) Feasibility of in vivo structural analysis of high-resolution magnetic resonance images of the proximal femur. Osteoporos Int 16:1307-1314
6. Link TM, Majumdar S, Augat P et al (1998) In vivo high resolution MRI of the calcaneus: differences in trabecular structure in osteoporosis patients. J Bone Miner Res 13:1175-1182
7. El-Kaissi S, Pasco JA, Henry MJ et al (2005) Femoral neck geometry and hip fracture risk: the Geelong osteoporosis study. Osteoporos Int 16:1299-1303
8. Bergot C, Bousson V, Meunier A et al (2002) Hip fracture risk and proximal femur geometry from DXA scans. Osteoporos Int 13:542-550
9. Alonso CG, Curiel MD, Carranza FH et al (2000) Femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Multicenter Project for Research in Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 11:714-720
10. Crabtree NJ, Kroger H, Martin A et al (2002) Improving risk assessment: hip geometry, bone mineral distribution and bone strength in hip fracture cases and controls. The EPOS study. European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 13:48-54
11. Boehm HF, Link TM, Monetti RA et al (2006) Analysis of the topological properties of the proximal femur on a regional scale: evaluation of multi-detector CT-scans for the assessment of biomechanical strength using local Minkowski functionals in 3D. SPIE Medical Imaging, San Diego, pp 6144-6254
12. Boehm HF, Link TM, Monetti RA et al (2004) Application of the Minkowski functionals in 3D to high resolution MR images of trabecular bone: prediction of the biomechanical strength by nonlinear topological measures. SPIE Medical Imaging, San Diego, pp 5323-5370
13. Majumdar S, Newitt D, Mathur A et al (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: relationship with X-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics. Osteoporos Int 6:376-385
14. Michielsen K, De Raedt H, Kawakatsu T (2001) Integralgeometry morphological image analysis. Phys Rep 347:461-538
15. Berg BA (2004) Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations and their statistical analysis. World Scientific, Singapore
16. Robert CP, Casella G (2004) Monte Carlo statistical methods. Springer Heidelberg New York
17. Metz CE (1978) Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 8:283-298
18. Huberty C (1994) Applied discriminant analysis. Wiley, New York
19. Eriksson L, Johansson E, Muller M et al (2000) On the selection of the training set in environmental QSAR analysis when compounds are clustered. J Chemometrics 14:599-616
20. Stone M (1977) An asymptotic equivalence of choice of model by cross-validation and Akaike's criterion. J R Stat Soc 38:44-47
21. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a parametric approach. Biometrics 44:837-845
22. White J, Harris SS, Dallal GE et al (2003) Precision of single vs bilateral hip bone mineral density scans. J Clin Densitom 6:159-162
23. Hans D, Duboeuf F, Schott AM et al (1997) Effects of a new positioner on the precision of hip bone mineral density measurements. J Bone Miner Res 12:1289-1294
24. Faulkner KG, Genant HK, McClung M (1995) Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans. Calcif Tissue Int 56:26-31
25. Boehm HF, Eckstein F, Wunderer C et al (2005) Improved performance of hip DXA using a novel region of interest in the upper part of the femoral neck: in vitro study using bone strength as a standard of reference. J Clin Densitom 8:488-494
26. Gnudi S, Ripamonti C, Gualtieri G et al (1999) Geometry of proximal femur in the prediction of hip fracture in osteoporotic women. Br J Radiol 72:729-733
27. Gregory JS, Stewart A, Undrill PE et al (2005) Bone shape, structure, and density as determinants of osteoporotic hip fracture: a pilot study investigating the combination of risk factors. Invest Radiol 40:591-597
28. Lochmuller EM, Zeller JB, Kaiser D et al (1998) Correlation of femoral and lumbar DXA and calcaneal ultrasound, measured in situ with intact soft tissues, with the in vitro failure loads of the proximal femur. Osteoporos Int 8:591-598
29. Gnudi S, Ripamonti C, Lisi L et al (2002) Proximal femur geometry to detect and distinguish femoral neck fractures from trochanteric fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 13:69-73
30. Greenspan SL, Beck TJ, Resnick NM et al (2005) Effect of hormone replacement, alendronate, or combination therapy on hip structural geometry: a 3-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Bone Miner Res 20:1525-1532
31. Berry E, Truscott JG, Stewart SP et al (1996) Spatial distribution of femoral bone mineral in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry images: a possible technique to improve discrimination between normal and osteoporotic patients. Br J Radiol 69:743-750