Paying for it? Surrogacy, Market Forces and Assisted Conception

Surrogate Motherhood: International Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 227-242

  Blyth, Eric ^a   Potter, Claire ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247569772     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Anderson, E, Value in Ethics and Economics (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press/The MIT Press, 1993).
2. Anderson, E, ‘Why commercial surrogate motherhood unethically commodifies women and children: Reply to McLachlan and Swales’ (2000) 8 Health Care Analysis 19.
3. Balen, A and Hayden, C, ‘British Fertility Society survey of all licensed clinics that perform surrogacy in the UK’ (1998) 1 Human Fertility 6.
4. Benshushan, A, and Schenker, JG, ‘Legitimising Surrogacy in Israel’ (1997) 12 Human Reproduction 1832.
5. Blyth, E, ‘Section 30: the acceptable face of surrogacy?' (1993) 4 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 248.
6. Blyth, E, ‘I wanted to be interesting. I wanted to be able to say “I’ve done something interesting with my life”: Interviews with surrogate mothers in Britain’ (1994) 12 Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 189.
7. Brazier, M, ‘Can you buy children?' (1999) 11 Child and Family Law Quarterly 345.
8. Brazier, M, Campbell, A and Golombok, S, Surrogacy. Review for Health Ministers of Current Arrangements for Payments and Regulation. Report of the Review Team, Cm 4068 (London, HMSO, 1998).
9. British Medical Association, Changing Conceptions of Motherhood. The Practice of Surrogacy in Britain (London, BMA Publications, 1996).
10. Caldwell, R, ‘I never wanted to keep them’ Globe and Mail, 24 March 2001, http://www.globeandmail.com/gam/Arts/20010324/SALIFE4.html
11. COTS, Report: AGM 13 (Lairg, COTS, 2001).
12. Caldwell, R, Surrogacy. A Workable Solution. In Response to the Review Team’s Report (Lairg, COTS, undated).
13. Cotton, K and Winn, D, Baby Cotton: For Love and Money (London, Dorling Kindersley, 1985).
14. Council of Europe, Human Artificial Procreation (Strasbourg, Council of Europe, 1989).
15. Council of Europe, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine (Strasbourg, Council of Europe, 1996).
16. Daniels, KR, ‘The semen providers’ in KR Daniels and E Haimes (eds), Donor Insemination: International Social Science Perspectives (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998).
17. Deech, R, Payments for egg and sperm donors, unpublished letter, 9 December (London, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 1998).
18. Department of Health and Social Security, Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology (The Warnock Report) Cmnd 9414 (London, DHSS, 1984).
19. Department of Health and Social Security, Legislation on Human Infertility Services and Embryo Research. Cm 46 (London, HMSO, 1986).
20. Department of Health and Social Security, Human Fertilisation and Embryology: A Framework for Legislation, Cm 259 (London, HMSO, 1987).
21. Dickenson, DL, ‘Procuring gametes for research and therapy: the argument for unisex altruism-a response to Donald Evans’ (1997) 23 Journal of Medical Ethics 93.
22. Foxcroft, L, ‘Surrogacy-Warnock and After’ (1997) 2 Medical Law International 337.
23. Freeman, M, ‘After Warnock-Whither the Law?' (1986) 39 Current Legal Problems 33.
24. Freeman, M, ‘Is Surrogacy Exploitative?' in S McLean (ed), Legal Issues in Human Reproduction (Aldershot, Gower, 1989).
25. Glover, J, Fertility and the Family: The Glover Report on Reproduction Technologies to the European Commission (London, Fourth Estates, 1989).
26. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Code of Practice (London, HFEA, 1993a).
27. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Second Annual Report (London, HFEA, 1993b).
28. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Consultation on the Implementation of Withdrawal of Payments to Donors (London, HFEA, 1998a).
29. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, HFEA minutes of meeting, November, (1998b) www.hfea.gov.uk
30. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Paid Egg Sharing to be Regulated, not Banned (press release) 10 December (London, HFEA, 1998c).
31. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Working Group on the Effects of Removing Payment to Donors Policy Statement on Payment for Gametes (London, HFEA, undated).
32. International Federation of Fertility Societies, International Consensus on Assisted Procreation (Montpellier, IFFS, 1995).
33. Johnson, MHC, ‘Payments to gamete donors: position of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority’ (1997) 12 Human Reproduction 1839.
34. Kornegay, RJ, ‘Is Commercial Surrogacy Baby Selling?' (1990) 7 Journal of Applied Philosophy 45.
35. Lee, R and Morgan, D, Human Fertilisation and Embryology-Regulating the Reproductive Revolution (London, Blackstone Press, 2001).
36. McLachlan, HV and Swales, JK, ‘Babies, Child Bearers and Commodification: Anderson, Brazier et al and the Political Economy of Commercial Surrogate Motherhood’ (2000) 8 Health Care Analysis 1.
37. McLachlan, HV and Swales, JK, ‘Exploitation and Commercial Surrogate Motherhood’ (2001) 7 Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 8.
38. The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law (1988) Surrogate Parenting: Analysis and Recommendations for Public Policy (New York, The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law, 1988).
39. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Human Tissue: Ethical and Legal Issues (London, Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 1995).
40. Overall, C, Ethics and Human Reproduction: a Feminist Analysis (London, Allen and Unwin, 1987).
41. Rae, SB, The Ethics of Commercial Surrogate Motherhood: Brave New Families? (London, Praeger, 1994).
42. Ragoné, H, Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart (Boulder, Westview Press, 1994).
43. Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies, Proceed with Care: Final Report of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies (Ottawa, Minister of Government Services, 1993).
44. Rubin, S, ‘Reproductive Options 1: A Spermdonor Baby Grows Up’ in J Zimmerman (ed), The Technological Woman: Interfacing with Tomorrow (New York, Praeger, 1983).
45. Sackville, T, Official Report, House of Commons, 26 October 1994, col 974.
46. Shalev, C, Birth Power: The Case for Surrogacy (New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 1989).
47. Shanley, ML, ‘Surrogate Mothering and Women’s Freedom: A Critique of Contracts for Human Reproduction’ (1993) Spring, Signs 618.
48. Teman, E, ‘Technological Fragmentation as Women’s Empowerment: Surrogate Motherhood in Israel’ (2001) 31 Women’s Studies Quarterly 11.
49. Tong, R, Feminist Approaches to Bioethics (Boulder, Colorado, Westview Press, 1997).
50. Troup, J and Thompson, P, ‘Gay Dads’ Baby No 3' The Sun, 1 June 2000, 1.
51. van Niekerk, A and van Zyl, L, ‘Commercial Surrogacy and the Commodification of Children: An Ethical Perspective’ (1995) 8 Medicine and Law 163.
52. Wertheimer, A, Exploitation (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1996).