Evaluation of imaging-guided core biopsy of pelvic masses

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 188, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1208-1211

  Yarram, Sai G ^a   Nghiem, Hanh V ^b   Higgins, Ellen ^a   Fox, Giovanna ^a   Nan, Bin ^a   Francis, Isaac R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsy; CT; Pelvic imaging; Sonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGING GUIDED CORE BIOPSY; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SAFETY; PELVIS CANCER; PELVIS TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TUMOR BIOPSY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PELVIC NEOPLASMS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 34247565447     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1393     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Charboneau JW, Reading CC, Welch TJ. CT and sonographically guided needle biopsy: current techniques and new innovations. AJR 1990; 154:1-10
2. Gupta S, Nguyen HL, Morello FA Jr, et al. Various approaches for CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of deep pelvic lesions: anatomic and technical considerations. RadioGraphics 2004; 24:175-189
3. Scanlan KA, Propeck PA, Lee FT Jr. Invasive procedures in the female pelvis: value of transabdominal, endovaginal, and endorectal US guidance. RadioGraphics 2001; 21:491-506
4. Welch TJ, Sheedy PF II, Johnson CD, et al. CT guided biopsy: prospective analysis of 1,000 procedures. Radiology 1989; 171:493-496
5. Triller J, Maddern G, Kraft P, et al. CT-guided biopsy of pelvic masses. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1991; 14:63-68
6. Dodd GD III, Esola CC, Memel DS, et al. Sonography: the undiscovered jewel of interventional radiology. RadioGraphics 1996; 16:1271-1288
7. Memel DS, Dodd GD III, Esola CC. Efficacy of sonography as a guidance technique for biopsy of abdominal, pelvic, and retroperitoneal lymph nodes. AJR 1996; 167:957-962
8. Bret PM, Guibaud L, Atri M, et al. Transvaginal US-guided aspiration of ovarian cysts and pelvic masses. Radiology 1992; 185:377-380
9. Woodward PJ, Hosseinzadeh K, Saenger JS. Radiologic staging of ovarian carcinoma with pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 2004; 24:225-246
10. Raaijmakers R, Kirkels WJ, Roobol MJ, et al. Complication rates and risk factors of 5802 transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a population-based screening program. Urology 2002; 60:826-830
11. Rodriguez LV, Terris MK. Risks and complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: a prospective study and review of the literature. J Urol 1998; 160:2115-2120
12. Kliewer MA, Sheafor DH, Paulson EK, et al. Percutaneous liver biopsy: a cost-benefit analysis comparing sonographic and CT guidance. AJR 1999; 173:1199-1202
13. Rubens DJ, Strang JG, Fultz PJ, et al. Sonographic guidance of mediastinal biopsy: an effective alternative to CT guidance. AJR 1997; 169:1605-1610