Laboratory and field evidence for structural habitat affinity of young-of-the-year lingcod

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 135, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1622-1630

  Petrie, Megan E ^a,c   Ryer, Clifford H ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE   (United States)

^c Manchester Research Station   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIAL SPECIES; FISH; FISHERY; HABITAT SELECTION; HABITAT STRUCTURE; HABITAT USE; JUVENILE; PREDATION RISK; SPAWNING; TAGGING;

NORTH AMERICA; OREGON; PACIFIC OCEAN; PACIFIC OCEAN (NORTHWEST); UNITED STATES; YAQUINA BAY;

OPHIODON ELONGATUS;

EID: 34247558261     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/T05-164.1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bartholomew, A., R. J. Diaz, and G. Cicchetti. 2000. New dimensionless indices of structural complexity: predicted and actual effects on a predator's foraging success. Marine Ecology Progress Series 206:45-58.
2. Barss, W. H., and R. J. Demory. 1989. Movement of lingcod off the central Oregon Coast. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Portland.
3. Buckley, R., G. Hueckel, B. Benson, S. Quinnel, and M. Canfield. 1984. Enhancement research on lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus) in Puget Sound. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Progress Report 216, Olympia.
4. Carr, M. H. 1994. Effects of macroalgal dynamics on recruitment of a temperate reef fish. Ecology 75:1320-1333.
5. Cass, A. J., R. J. Beamish, and G. A. McFarlane. 1990. Lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus). Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 109.
6. Dean, T. A., L. Halderson, D. R. Laur, S. C. Jewett, and A. Blanchard. 2000. The distribution of nearshore fishes in kelp and eelgrass communities in Prince William Sound, Alaska: associations with vegetation and physical habitat characteristics. Environmental Biology of Fishes 57:271-287.
7. Eggleston, D. B. 1995. Recruitment in Nassau grouper Epinephelus striatus: post-settlement abundance, microhabitat features, and ontogenetic habitat shifts. Marine Ecology Progress Series 124:9-22.
8. Hart, J. L. 1973. Pacific fishes of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin 180.
9. Hurlbert, S. H. 1984. Pseudoreplicafion and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54:187-211.
10. Jagielo, T. H. 1990. Movement of tagged lingcod Ophiodon elongatus at Neah Bay, Washington. Fisheries Bulletin 88:815-820.
11. Jenkins, G. P., and M. J. Wheatley. 1998. The influence of habitat structure on nearshore fish assemblages in a southern Australian embayment: comparison of shallow seagrass, reef-algal and unvegetated sand habitats, with emphasis on their importance to recruitment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 221:147-172.
12. Jones, G. P. 1984. The influence of habitat and behavioural interactions on the local distribution of the wrasse, Pseudolabrus celidotus. Environmental Biology of Fishes 10:43-58.
13. Koenig, C. C., and F. C. Coleman. 1998. Absolute abundance and survival of juvenile gags in seagrass beds of the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 127:44-55.
14. Lewis, F. G., III, and A. W. Stoner. 1983. Distribution of macrofauna within seagrass beds: an explanation for patterns of abundance. Bulletin of Marine Science 33:296-304.
15. Low, C. J., and R. J. Beamish. 1978. A study of the nesting behavior of lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus) in the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia. Fisheries and Marine Service, Technical Report 843, Nanaimo, British Columbia.
16. Milinski, M. 1993. Predation risk and feeding behaviour. Pages 285-306 in T. J. Pitcher, editor. Behaviour of teleost fishes, 2nd edition. Chapman and Hall, New York.
17. Mathews, S. B., and M. LaRiviere. 1987. Movement of tagged lingcod, Ophiodon elongatus, in the Pacific Northwest. Fisheries Bulletin 85:153-159.
18. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 2005. Federal Pacific Coast groundfish regulations for commercial and recreational fishing 3-200 nautical miles off Washington, Oregon, and California. 50 CFR Part 660, Subpart G.7. NMFS, Northwest Regional Office, Seattle.
19. Orth, R., J. L. Heck, Jr., and J. van Montfrans. 1984. Faunal communities in seagrass beds: a review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics on predator-prey relationship. Estuaries 7:339-350.
20. Petrie, M. E., and C. H. Ryer. 2006. Determinants of refuge use by post-settlement lingcod. Journal of Fish Biology 69:957-969.
21. Ryer, C. H., A. W. Stoner, and R. H. Titgen. 2004. Behavioral mechanisms underlying the refuge value of benthic habitat structure for two flatfishes with differing antipredator strategies. Marine Ecology Progress Series 268:231-243.
22. Stoner, A. W., and R. H. Titgen. 2003. Biological structures and bottom type influence habitat choices made by Alaska flatfishes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 292:43-59.
23. Schofield, P. J. 2003. Habitat selection of two gobies (Microgobius gulosus, Gobiosoma robustum): influence of structural complexity, competitive interactions, and presence of a predator. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 288:125-137.
24. Smith, B. D., G. A. McFarlane, and A. J. Cass. 1990. Movements and mortality of tagged male and female lingcod in the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 119:813-824.
25. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1969. Biometry the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman, San Francisco.
26. Spencer, M. L., A. W. Stoner, C. H. Ryer, and E. J. Munk. 2005. A towed camera sled for estimating abundance of juvenile flatfishes and habitat characteristics: comparison with beam trawls and divers. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 64:497-503.
27. Starr, R. M., V. O'Connell, and S. Ralston. 2004. Movements of lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus) in southeast Alaska: potential for increased conservation and yield from marine reserves. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61:1083-1094.
28. Stoneman, C. L., and M. L. Jones. 2000. The influence of habitat features on the biomass and distribution of three species of southern Ontario stream salmonids. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:639-657.
29. Tupper, M., and R. G. Boutilier. 1997. Effects of habitat on settlement, growth, predation risk and survival of a temperate reef fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series 151:225-236.