Comparison of methods to enhance separation characteristics in nanofiltration

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 46, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 2236-2242

  Van Der Bruggen, Bart ^a   Bracken, Leen ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Universitaire Campus   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURVE FITTING; DISSOLUTION; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

AQUEOUS MATRIX; PERMEATE RECOVERY; REJECTION CURVES; SIGMOID REJECTION;

NANOFILTRATION;

CURVE FITTING; DISSOLUTION; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

EID: 34247549237     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie0608758     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Ngiem, L. D.; Schäfer, A. I. Fouling autospy of hollow-fibre MF membranes in wastewater reclamation. Desalination 2006, 788 (1-3), 113.
2. Chang, I. S.; Kim, S. N. Wastewater treatment using membrane filtration-effect of biosolids concentration on cake resistance. Process Biochem. 2005, 40 (3-4), 1307.
3. Yoon, Y.; Westerhoff, P.; Snyder, S. A.; Wert, E. C. Nanofiltration and ultrafiltration of endocrine disrupting compounds, pharmaceuticals and personal care products. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 270 (1-2), 88.
4. Kimura, K.; Yamato, N.; Yamamura, H.; Watanabe, Y. Membrane fouling in pilot-scale membrane Bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39 (16), 6293.
5. Sostar-Turk, S.; Petrinic, I.; Simonie, M. Laundry wastewater treatment using coagulation and membrane filtration. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2005, 44 (2), 185.
6. Pollice, A.; Lopez, A.; Laera, G.; Rubino, P.; Lonigro, A. Tertiary filtered municipal wastewater as alternative water source in agriculture: a field investigation in Southern Italy. Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 324 (1-3), 201.
7. Ravazzini, A. M.; van Nieuwenhuijzen, A. F.; van der Graaf, J. H. M. J. Direct ultrafiltration of municipal wastewater: comparison between filtration of raw sewage and primary clarifier effluent. Desalination 2005, 178 (1-3), 51.
8. Melin, T.; Jefferson, B.; Bixio, D.; Thoeye, C.; De Wilde, W.; De Koning, J.; van der Graaf, J.; Wintgens, T. Membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment and reuse. Desalination 2006, 187 (1-3), 271.
9. te Poele, S.; van der Graaf, J. H. M. J. Enzymatic cleaning in ultrafiltration of wastewater treatment plant effluent. Desalination 2005, 179 (1-3), 73.
10. Broeckmann, A.; Wintgens, T.; Schafer, A. I. Removal and fouling mechanisms in nanofiltration of polysaccharide solutions. Desalination 2005, 178 (1-3), 149.
11. Escobar, I. C.; Hoek, E. M.; Gabelich, C. J.; DiGiano, F. A.; Le Gouellec, Y. A.; Beruhe, P.; Howe, K. J. Committee Report: Recent Advances and Research Needs in Membrane Fouling. J.-Am. Water Works Assoc. 2005, 97 (8), 79.
12. Lee, S.; Ang, W. S.; Elimelech, M. Fouling of reverse osmosis membranes by hydrophilic organic matter: implications for water reuse. Desalination 2006, 187 (1-3), 313.
13. Nederlof, M. M.; van Paassen, J. A. M.: Jong, R. Nanofiltration concentrate disposal: Experiences in The Netherlands. Desalination 2005, 178 (1-3), 303.
14. Van der Bruggen, B.; Lejon, L.; Vandecasteele, C. Reuse, treatment and discharge of the concentrate of pressure driven membrane processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37 (17), 3733.
15. Semiat, R. Desalination: Present and future. Water Int. 2000, 25 (1), 54.
16. Koros, W. J. Advanced membranes for more energy efficient separations. In Book of Abstracts, Advanced Membrane Technology III: Membrane Engineering for Process Intensification, June 11-15, 2006, Cetraro, Italy; p 26.
17. Kim, T. U.; Amy, O.; Drewes, J. E. Rejection of trace organic compounds by high-pressure membranes. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 51 (6-7), 335.
18. Ngiem, L. O.; Schäfer, A. I.; Elimelech, M. Pharmaceutical retention mechanisms by nanofiltration membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39 (19), 7698.
19. Kiso, Y.; Sigiura, Y.; Kitao, T.; Nishimura, K. Effects of hydrophobicity and molecular size on rejection of aromatic pesticides with nanofiltration membranes. J Membr. Sci. 2001, 192 (1-2), 1.
20. Dalton, S. K.; Brant, J. A.; Wiesner, M. R. Chemical interactions between dissolved organic matter and low-molecular weight organic compounds: Impacts on membrane separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 266 (1-2), 30.
21. Bowen, W. R.; Welfoot, J. S. Predictive modelling of nanofiltration: membrane specification and process optimisation. Desalination 2002, 147 (1-3), 197.
22. Van der Bruggen, B.; Vandecasteele, C. Modelling of the retention of uncharged molecules with nanofiltration. Water Res. 2002, 36 (5), 1360.
23. Zhao, Y.; Taylor, J. S.; Chellam, S. Predicting RO/NF water quality by modified solution diffusion model and artificial neural networks. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 263 (1-2), 38.
24. Boussu, K.; Van der Bruggen, B.; Volodin, A.; Van Haesendonck, C.; Delcour, J. A. Van der Meeren, P.; Vandecasteele, C. Characterization of commercial nanofiltration membranes comparison with self-made polyethersulfone membranes. Desalination 2006, 191, 245.
25. Dubois, M.; Gilles, K. A.; Hamilton, J. K.; Rebers, P. A.; Smith, F. Colometric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28 (3), 350.
26. Van der Bruggen, B.; Schaep, J.; Wilms, D.; Vandecasteele, C. Influence of molecular size, polarity and charge on the retention of organic molecules by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 156, 29.
27. Feins, M.; Sirkar, K. K. Novel internally staged Ultrafiltration for protein purification. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 248, 137.
28. Feins, M.; Sirkar, K. K. Highly selective membranes in protein ultrafiltration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 86 (6), 603.