Hybrid base-isolation with magnetorheological damper and fuzzy control

Structural Control and Health Monitoring

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 384-405

  Lin, P Y ^a   Roschke, P N ^b   Loh, C H ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING   (Taiwan)

^b Texas AandM University   (United States)

Author keywords

Base isolation; Fuzzy control; Magnetorheological damper; Semi active control; Vibration control

Indexed keywords

CONTROL EQUIPMENT; EARTHQUAKES; ELECTRIC POWER UTILIZATION; ENERGY DISSIPATION; FUZZY CONTROL; RHEOLOGY; ROBUST CONTROL; TRANSDUCERS; VIBRATION CONTROL;

ACCELERATION TRANSDUCERS; HYBRID ISOLATION SYSTEM; MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPER; SEMI-ACTIVE CONTROL;

DAMPING;

EID: 34247540527     PISSN: 15452255     EISSN: 15452263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stc.163     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Jung HJ, Spencer Jr BF, Ni YQ, Lee IW. State-of-the-art of semiactive control systems using MR fluid dampers in civil engineering applications. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 2004; 17(3-4):493-526.
2. Naeim F, Kelly JM. Design of Seismic Isolated Structures: From Theory to Practice. Wiley: New York, 1999.
3. Chang SP, Makris N, Whittaker AS, Thompson ACT. Experimental and analytical studies on the performance of hybrid isolation systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:421-443.
4. Sadek F, Mohraz B. Semiactive control algorithm for structures with variable dampers. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1998; September:981-990.
5. Symans MD, Constantinou MC. Seismic testing of a building structure with a semi-active fluid damper control system. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1997; 26:759-777.
6. Kurata N, Kobori T, Takahashi M, Niwa N, Midorikawa H. Actual seismic response of controlled building with semi-active damper system. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28:1427-1447.
7. Niwa N, Kobori T, Takahashi M, Midorikawa H, Kurata N, Mizuno T. Dynamic loading test and simulation analysis of full-scale semi-active hydraulic damper for structural control. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29:789-812.
8. Kobori T, Takahashi M, Nasu T, Niwa N. Seismic response controlled structure with active variable stiffness system. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1993; 22:925-941.
9. Burton SA, Makris N, Konstantopoulos I, Antsaklis PJ. Modeling the response of ER damper: phenomenology and emulation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1996; September:897-906.
10. Spencer Jr BF, Dyke SJ, Sain MK, Carlson JD. Phenomenological model of magnetorheological dampers. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1997; 123(3):230-238.
11. Fujitani H, Soda S, Iwata N, Sodeyama H, Hata K, Sundkoda K, Komatsu Y. Dynamic performance evaluation of magneto-rheological damper by experimental and analytical methods. Proceedings of the U.S.-Japan Joint Workshop and Third Grantees Meeting, Monbu-Kagaku-sho and NSF, Seattle, Washington, 2001.
12. Spencer Jr BF, Nagarajaiah S. State of the art of structural control. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2003; 129(7):845-856.
13. Chang CC, Roschke PN. Neural network modeling of a magnetorheological damper. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 1998; 9:755-764.
14. Lin PY, Loh CH, Chung LL, Chang CP, Roschke PN. Semi-active controlled base-isolation system with magnetorheological damper. Report Number NCREE-03-30, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan, 2003.
15. The MathWorks, Inc. Fuzzy Logic Toolbox Users Guide. Natick, Massachusetts, 2002.
16. Yen J, Langari R. Fuzzy Logic: Intelligence, Control, and Information. Prentice-Hall, New York, 1999.
17. Kim HS, Roschke PN. Design of fuzzy logic controller for smart base isolation system using genetic algorithm. Engineering Structures 2006; 28(1):84-96.
18. Kim HS, Roschke PN, Lin PY, Loh CH. Fuzzy control of a novel base isolator and MR damper for seismic applications. Engineering Structures 2006; in press.