Unwarranted assumptions about children's testimonial accuracy

Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue , 2007, Pages 311-328

  Ceci, Stephen J ^a   Kulkofsky, Sarah ^a   Klemfuss, J Zoe ^a   Sweeney, Charlotte D ^a   Bruck, Maggie ^b  

^a Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

False reports; Open ended questions; Suggestibility

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CHILD; EXPERT WITNESS; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; WITNESS;

AGE FACTORS; CHILD; CHILD ABUSE, SEXUAL; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; JURISPRUDENCE; MENTAL RECALL; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUGGESTION; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 34247540415     PISSN: 15485943     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091354     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Binet A. 1900. La Suggestibilité. Paris: Schleicher Freres
2. Bruck M, Ceci SJ. 2004. Forensic developmental psychology: unveiling four common misconceptions. Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci. 13:229-32
3. Bruck M, Ceci SJ, Francoer E. 1999. The accuracy of mothers' memories of conversations with their preschool children. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 5:89-106
4. Bruck M, Ceci SJ, Francouer E, Barr R. 1995a. "I hardly cried when I got my shot": influencing children's reports about a visit to their pediatrician. Child Dev. 66:193-208
5. Bruck M, Ceci SJ, Francoeur E, Renick A. 1995b. Anatomically detailed dolls do not facilitate preschoolers' reports of a pediatric examination involving genital touching. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 1:95-109
6. Bruck M, Ceci SJ, Hembrooke H. 2002. Nature of true and false narratives. Dev. Rev. 22:520-54
7. Bruck M, London K, Landa R, Goodman J. 2007. Autobiographical memory and suggestibility. Dev. Psychopathol. 19:73-95
8. Bruck M, Melnyk L. 2004. Individual differences in children's suggestibility: a review and synthesis. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 18:947-96
9. Bruck M, Melnyk L, Ceci SJ. 1997. External and internal sources of variation in the creation of false reports in children. Learn. Individ. Differ. 9:289-316
10. Ceci SJ, Bruck M. 1995. Jeopardy in the Courtroom. Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
11. Ceci SJ, Bruck M. 1993. The suggestibility of children's recollections: an historical review and synthesis. Psychol. Bull. 113:403-39
12. Ceci SJ, Bruck M, Rosenthal R. 1995. Children's allegations of sexual abuse: forensic and scientific issues: a reply to commentators. Psychol. Public Policy Law 1:494-520
13. Ceci SJ, Crotteau-Huffman M, Smith E, Loftus EW. 1994a. Repeatedly thinking about non-events. Conscious. Cogn. 3:388-407
14. Ceci SJ, Friedman RD. 2000. The suggestibility of children: scientific research and legal implications. Cornell Law Rev. 86:34-108
15. Ceci SJ, Loftus EF, Leichtman M, Bruck M. 1994b. The possible role of source misattributions in the creation of false beliefs among preschoolers. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 42:304-20
16. Ceci SJ, Loftus EW, Leichtman M, Bruck M. 1994c. The role of source misattributions in the creation of false beliefs among preschoolers. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 62:304-20
17. Ceci SJ, Papierno PB, Kulkofsky S. 2007. Representational constraints on children's suggestibility. Psychol. Sci. In press
18. Ceci SJ, Ross D, Toglia M. 1987. Suggestibility of children's memory: psycholegal implications. J Exp. Psychol. Gen. 116:38-49
19. Erdmann K, Volbert R, Bohm C. 2004. Children report suggested events even when interviewed in a nonsuggestive manner: What are the implications for credibility assessment? Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 18:589-611
20. Feher B. 1987. The alleged molestation victim, the rules of evidence, and the constitution: Should children really be seen and not heard? Am, J. Crim. Law 14:227, 231-33
21. Finnila K, Mahlberga N, Santtilaa P, Sandnabbaa K, Niemib P. 2003. Validity of a test of children's suggestibility for predicting responses to two interview situations differing in their degree of suggestiveness. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 85:32-49
22. Garven S, Wood JM, Malpass R, Shaw JS. 1998. More than suggestion: consequences of the interviewing techniques from the McMartin preschool case. J. Appl. Psychol. 83:347-59
23. Garven S, Wood JM, Malpass RS. 2000. Allegations of wrongdoing: the effects of reinforcement on children's mundane and fantastic claims. J. Appl. Psychol. 1:38-49
24. Gilstrap L, Ceci SJ. 2004. Reconceptualizing children's suggestibility: bidirectional and temporal properties. Child Dev. 75:1-14
25. Goodman GS, Quas JA, Batterman-Faunce JM, Riddlesberger MM, Kuhn J. 1994. Predictors of accurate and inaccurate memories of traumatic events experienced in childhood. Conscious. Cogn. 3:269-94
26. Greenhoot AF. 2000. Remembering and understanding: the effects of changes in underlying knowledge on children's recollections. Child Dev. 71:1309-28
27. Hershkowitz I. 1999. The dynamics of interviews involving plausible and implausible allegations of child sexual abuse. Appl. Dev. Sci. 3:86-91
28. Hershkowitz I. 2001. A case study of child sexual false allegation. Child Abuse Negl. 25:1397-411
29. Home Off. Dept. Health. 1992. Memorandum of Good Practice on Video Recorded Interviews with Child Witnesses for Criminal Proceedings. London: Her Majesty's Station. Off.
30. Hyman IEJ, Husband TH, Billings JF. 1995. False memories of childhood experiences. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 9:181-97
31. In the Matter of Riley, Austin, and Shelby Blanchard v. John Blanchard. July 2001. Calif. Sup. Ct., CK40772/CK40775
32. In the Matter of Ryan D. Smith. May 30, 2001. State of Oregon Appelate Ct., #98-0325-JA; A106007
33. Kohenken G. 1989. Behavioral correlates of statement credibility: theories, paradigms, and results. In Criminal Behavior and the Justice System: Psychological Perspectives, ed. H Wegener, F Leosel, J Haisch, pp. 271-89. New York: Springer-Verlag
34. Lamb ME, Sternberg KJ, Orbach Y, Esplin PW, Stewart H, Mitchell S. 2003. Age differences in young children's responses to open-ended invitations in the course of forensic interviews. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 71:926-34
35. Lamb ME, Hershkowitz I, Sternberg KJ, Esplin PW, Hovav M, et al. 1996. Effects of investigative style on Israeli children's responses. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 19:627-37
36. Leichtman MD, Ceci SJ. 1995. The effects of stereotypes and suggestions on preschoolers' reports. Dev. Psychol. 31:568-78
37. Lindberg M. 1991. An interactive approach to assessing the suggestibility and testimony of eyewitness. In The Suggestibility of Children's Recollections, ed. J Doris, pp. 47-55. Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
38. Loftus EF. 2004. Memories of things unseen. Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci. 13:145-47
39. Loftus EF, Pickrell JE. 1995. The formation of false memories. Psychiatr. Ann. 25:720-25
40. London K, Bruck M, Ceci SJ, Shuman D. 2005. Disclosure of child sexual abuse: What does the research tell us about the ways that children tell? Psychol. Public Policy Law 11:194-226
41. Lyon TD. 1999. The new wave in children's suggestibility research: a critique. Cornell Law Rev. 86:1-84
42. Marche TA. 1999. Memory strength affects reporting misinformation. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 73:45-71
43. Melnyk L, Bruck M. 2004. Timing moderates the effect of repeated suggestive interviewing on children's suggestibility. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 18:613-31
44. Natl. Soc. Prev. Cruel. Child. Childline. 1993. The Child Witness Pack. London: Nat. Soc. Prev. Cruel. Child.
45. Orbach Y, Hershkowitz I, Lamb ME, Epslin PE, Horowitz D. 2000. Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims. Child Abuse Negl. 24:733-52
46. Ornstein PA, Merritt KA, Baker-Ward K, Furtado E, Gordon BN, Principe G. 1998. Children's knowledge, expectation, and long-term retention. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 12:387-405
47. Peterson C, Parsons T, Dean M. 2004. Providing misleading and reinstatement information a year after it happened: effects on long-term memory. Memory 12:1-13
48. Poole DA, Lindsay DS. 1998. Assessing the accuracy of young children's reports: lessons from the investigation of child sexual abuse. Appl. Prevent. Psychol. 7:1-26
49. Poole D, Lindsay DS. 2001. Children's eyewitness reports after exposure to misinformation from parents. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 7:27-50
50. Poole DA, White LT. 1993. Two years later: effects of question repetition and retention interval on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Dev. Psychol. 29:844-53
51. Powell MB, Jones CH, Campbell C. 2003. A comparison of preschooler's recall of experienced versus nonexperienced events across multiple interviewers. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 17:935-52
52. Principe GF, Ceci SJ. 2002. "I saw it with my own ears": the influence of peer conversations and suggestive questions on preschoolers' event memory. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 83:1-25
53. Principe GF, Kanaya T, Ceci SJ, Singh M. 2006. Believing is seeing: how rumors can engender false memories in preschoolers. Psychol. Sci. 17(3):243-48
54. Raskin DC, Esplin PW. 1991. Statement validity assessment: interview procedures and content analysis of children's statements of sexual abuse. Behav. Assess. 13:265-91
55. Roebers CM, Schnieder W. 2001. Individual differences in children's eyewitness recall: the influence of intelligence and shyness. Appl. Dev. Sci. 5:9-21
56. Scullin M, Kanaya T, Ceci SJ. 2002. Measurement of individual differences in children's suggestibility across situations. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 8:233-46
57. Scullin MH, Ceci SJ. 2001. A suggestibility scale for children. Personal. Individ. Differ. 30:843-56
58. Smith BE, Goretsky-Elstein S. 1993. The Prosecution of Child Sexual and Physical Abuse Cases. Washington, DC: Am. Bar Assoc.
59. State of Calif. v. Buckey. 1990. Sup. Ct., Los Angeles County, #A750900
60. Steller M, Koehnken G. 1989. Criteria-based statement analysis. In Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence, ed. DC Raskin, pp. 217-45. New York: Springer Publ.
61. Sternberg KJ, Lamb ME, Hershkowitz I. 1996. Child sexual abuse investigations in Israel. Crim. Justice Behav. 23:322-37
62. Sternberg KJ, Lamb ME, Hershkowitz I. 1997. Effects of introductory style on children's abilities to describe experiences of sexual abuse. Child Abuse Neglect 21:1130-41
63. Sternberg KJ, Lamb ME, Esplin PW, Baradaran L. 1999. Using a scripted protocol in investigative interviews: a pilot study. Appl. Dev. Sci. 3:70-76
64. Stromwell LA, Bengtsson L, Leander L, Granhag PA. 2004. Assessing children's statements: the impact of a repeated experience on CBCA and RM ratings. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 18:653-68
65. Summit R. 1983. The child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome. Child Abuse Neglect 7:177-93
66. Thompson WC, Clarke-Stewart KA, Lepore SJ. 1997. What did the janitor do? Suggestive interviewing and the accuracy of children's accounts. Law Hum. Behav. 21:405-26
67. Vrij A. 2005. Criteria-based content analysis: a qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychol. Public Policy Law 11:3-41
68. Wellman HM, Cross D, Watson J. 2001. Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. Child Dev. 72:655-84
69. White TL, Leichtman MD, Ceci SJ. 1997. The good, the bad, and the ugly: accuracy, inaccuracy, and elaboration in preschoolers' reports about a past event. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 11:S37-54
70. Zaragoza M, Payment K, Kichler J, Stines L, Drivdahl S. 2001. Forced confabulation and false memory in child witnesses. Presented at Bienn. Meet. Soc. Res. Child Dev. Minneapolis, MN