Response: The trouble with goals

Communication Studies

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 294-299

  Shepherd, Gregory J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247539381     PISSN: 10510974     EISSN: 17451035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10510979809368539     Document Type: Note

References (24)

1. Berger, C. R., 1997. Planing strategic interaction: Attaining goals through communicative action, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Berlo, D. K., 1960. The process of communication, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
3. Carey, J., 1975. A cultural approach to communication. Communication, 2: 1-22.
4. Carey, J., 1988. Communication as culture: Essays on media and society, Boston: Unwin Hyman.
5. Dewey, J., 1925. Experience and nature, Chicago: Open Court.
6. Dewey, J., 1927. The public and its problems, Athens: Swallow Press/Ohio University Press.
7. Gadamer, H. G., 1989. Truth and Method, 2nd rev. ed., New York: Crossroad.
8. Hample, D., 1997. “ Framing message production research within field theory ”. In Message production: Advances in communication theory, Edited by: Greene, J. O., 171-192. Matwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
9. Klinger, E., 1985. “ Missing links in action theory ”. In Goal directed behavior: The concept of action in psychology, Edited by: Frese, M., and Sabini, J., 134-160. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Lannamann, J. W., 1991. Interpersonal communication research as ideological practice. Communication Theory, 1: 179-203.
11. Leeds-Hurwitz, W., 1985. Social approaches to communication, New York: Guilford.
12. O'Keefe, B.J., and Shepherd, G. J., 1987. The pursuit of multiple objectives in face-to-face persuasive interactions: Effects of construct differentiation on message organization. Communication Monographs, 54: 396-419.
13. O'Keefe, B.J., and Shepherd, G. J., 1989. The communication of identity during face-to-face persuasive interactions: Effects of perceiver's construct differentiation and target's message strategies. Communication Research, 16: 375-404.
14. O'Keefe, D. J., Message description. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association. Boston. November.
15. 1971. Oxford English Dictionary, compact ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Peters, J. D., 1989. John Locke, the individual, and the origin of communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 75: 387-399.
17. Reddy, M., 1979. “ The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language ”. In Metaphor and thought, Edited by: Ortony, A., 284-324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Rothenbuhler, E. W., 1998. Ritual communication: From everyday conversation to mediated ceremony, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Shepherd, G.J., 1992. Communication as influence: Definitional exclusion. Communication Studies, 43: 203-219.
20. Shepherd, G.J., 1993. Building a discipline of communication. Journal of Communication, 43: 83-91.
21. Shepherd, G.J., in press. Advances in communication theory: A critical review. Journal of Communication.
22. Shepherd, G.J., and O'Keefe, B. J., 1984. The relationship between the developmental level of persuasive strategies and their effectiveness. Central States Speech Journal, 35: 137-152.
23. Shepherd, G.J., and Rothenbuhler, E. W., 1991. “ A synthetic perspective on goals and discourse ”. In Understanding face-to-face interaction: Issues linking goals and discourse, Edited by: Tracy, K., 189-203. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Sigman, S., 1992. Do social approaches to interpersonal communication constitute a contribution to communication theory?. Communication Theory, 2: 347-356.