Required disclosures in financial reports

Accounting Review

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 301-326

  Schipper, Katherine ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247536746     PISSN: 00014826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/accr.2007.82.2.301     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Aboody, D., M. Barth, and R. Kasznik. 2004. Firms' voluntary recognition of stock-based compensation expense. Journal of Accounting Research 42 (May): 123-150.
2. Ahmed, A., E. Kilic, and G. Lobo. 2006. Does recognition versus disclosure matter? Evidence from value-relevance of banks' recognized and disclosed derivative financial instruments. The Accounting Review 81 (3): 567-588.
3. Barth, M. 1991. Relative measurement errors among alternative pension asset and liability measures. The Accounting Review 66: 433-463.
4. _, and C. Murphy. 1994. Required financial statement disclosures: Purposes, subject, number and trends. Accounting Horizons 8: 1-22.
5. _, G. Clinch, and T. Shibano. 2003. Market effects of recognition and disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research 41 (September): 581-609.
6. Beaver, W., and M. Venkatachalam. 2003. Differential pricing of components of bank loan fair values. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 18 (1): 41-67.
7. Bloomfield, R., and R. Libby. 1996. Market reactions to differentially available information in the laboratory. Journal of Accounting Research 34 (Autumn): 183-207.
8. Boone, J. 2002. Revisiting the reportedly weak value relevance of oil and gas asset present values: The roles of measurement error, model misspecification, and time-period idiosyncrasy. The Accounting Review 77 (January): 73-106.
9. Bullen, H., and K. Crook. 2005. Revisiting the concepts: A new conceptual framework project. Financial Accounting Standards Board and International Accounting Standards Board. Available at: http://www.fasb.org/ articles&reports/revisiting_the_concepts_may_05.pdf.
10. Choi, B., D. Collins, and W. B. Johnson. 1997. Valuation implications of reliability differences: The case of nonpension postretirement obligations. The Accounting Review 72: 351-383.
11. Cole, C., and C. Jones. 2004. The usefulness of MD&A disclosures in the retail industry. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 19 (Fall): 361-388.
12. Cotter, J., and I. Zimmer. 2003. Disclosure versus recognition: The case of asset revaluations. AsiaPacific Journal of Accounting & Economics 10 (June): 81-99.
13. Davis-Friday, P., L. Folami, C. Liu, H. Mittelstaedt. 1999. The value relevance of financial statement recognition vs. disclosure: Evidence from SFAS No. 106. The Accounting Review 74 (October): 403-423.
14. _, C. Liu, and H. Mittelstaedt. 2004. Recognition and disclosure reliability: Evidence from SFAS No. 106. Contemporary Accounting Research 21 (Summer): 399-429.
15. Dearman, D., and M. Shields. 2005. Avoiding accounting fixation: Determinants of cognitive adaptation to differences in accounting method. Contemporary Accounting Research 22 (Summer): 351-384.
16. Dechow, P., and I. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement): 35-59.
17. Dietrich, J., S. Kachelmeier, D. Kleinmuntz, and T. Linsmeier. 2001. Market efficiency, bounded rationality, and supplemental business reporting disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (September): 243-268.
18. Dopuch, N., and M. Pincus. 1988. Evidence on the choice of inventory accounting methods: LIFO versus FIFO. Journal of Accounting Research 26: 28-59.
19. Dye, R., 2001. An evaluation of "essays on disclosure" and the disclosure literature in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32 (1-3): 181-235.
20. Frederickson, J., F. Hodge, and J. Pratt. 2006. The evolution of stock option accounting: Disclosure, voluntary recognition, mandated recognition and management disavowals. The Accounting Review 81 (5): 1073-1093.
21. Groves, R. 1994. Financial disclosure: When more is not better. Financial Executive 10 (3): 11.
22. Hirshleifer, D., and S. H. Teoh. 2003. Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 36 (December): 337-386.
23. Hirst, E., and P. Hopkins. 1998. Comprehensive income reporting and analysts' valuation judgments. Journal of Accounting Research 36: 47-75.
24. _, P. Hopkins, and J. Wahlen. 2004. Fair values, income measurement, and bank analysts' risk and valuation judgments. The Accounting Review 79: 453-472.
25. Hobson, J., and S. Kachelmeier. 2005. Strategic disclosure of risky prospects: A laboratory experiment. The Accounting Review 80 (3): 825-846.
26. Hodge, F., J. Kennedy and L. Maines. 2004. Does search-facilitating technology improve the transparency of financial reporting? The Accounting Review 79: 687-703.
27. Imhoff, E., and J. Thomas. 1988. Economic consequences of accounting standards: The lease disclosure rule change. Journal of Accounting and Economics 10: 277-310.
28. _, R. Lipe, and D. Wright. 1991. Operating leases: Impact of constructive capitalization. Accounting Horizons 5: 51-63.
29. _, _, and _. 1993. The effects of recognition versus disclosure on shareholder risk and executive compensation. Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance 8: 335-368.
30. _, _, and _. 1995. Is footnote disclosure an adequate alternative to financial statement recognition? The Journal of Financial Statement Analysis 1 (Fall): 70-81.
31. Jones, J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (Autumn): 193-228.
32. Jorion, P. 2002. How informative are value-at-risk disclosures? The Accounting Review 77: 911-931.
33. Koonce, L., M. McAnally, and M. Mercer. 2005. How do investors judge the risk of financial items? The Accounting Review 80 (January): 221-241.
34. Lambert, R. 2003. Discussion of: Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 36 (December): 387-400.
35. Larcker, D., and T. Rusticus. 2005. On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.
36. Libby, R., M. Nelson, and J. Hunton. 2006. Recognition v. disclosure, auditor tolerance for misstatement, and the reliability of stock-compensation and lease information. Journal of Accounting Research 44 (3): 533.
37. Linsmeier, T., D. Thornton, M. Venkatachalam, and M. Welker. 2002. The effect of mandated market risk disclosures on trading volume sensitivity to interest rate, exchange rate, and commodity price movements. The Accounting Review 77 (April): 343-377.
38. Lys, T., and L. Vincent. 1995. An analysis of value destruction in AT&T's acquisition of NCR. Journal of Financial Economics 39: 353-378.
39. Maines, L., and L. McDaniel. 2000. Effects of comprehensive-income characteristics on nonprofessional investors'judgments: The role of financial statement presentation format. The Accounting Review 75 (April): 179-207.
40. Niu, F., and G. Richardson. 2006. Are securitizations in substance sales or secured borrowings: Capital market evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (4): 1105-1133.
41. Sribunnak, V., and F. Wong. 2006. The impact of excluding nonfinancial risk exposure on the usefulness of foreign exchange sensitivity-analysis risk disclosures. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 21 (1): 1-25.
42. Street, D., N. Nichols, and S. Gray. 2000. Segment disclosures under SPAS No. 131: Has business segment reporting improved? Accounting Horizons 14 (3): 259-285.
43. Thornton, D., and M. Welker. 2004. The effect of oil and gas producers' FRR No. 48 disclosures on investors' risk assessments. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 19 (Winter): 85-114.
44. Verrecchia, R. 2001. Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32 (1-3): 97-180.
45. Wahlen, J. 2003. Discussion of: Differential pricing of components of bank loan fair values. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 18 (1): 69-77.
46. Wiedman, C., and H. Wier. 1999. Management of note disclosures: The case of unconsolidated subsidiaries prior to FAS No. 94. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 14 (1): 73-94.
47. Wong, M. 2000. The association between SFAS No. 119 derivatives disclosures and the foreign exchange risk exposure of manufacturing firms. Journal of Accounting Research 38 (Autumn): 387-417.