Pancreatoscopy: Present and future role

Current Gastroenterology Reports

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 136-143

  Chen, Yang K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER STAGING; CHRONIC PANCREATITIS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPY; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS DUCT STENOSIS; PANCREATOSCOPY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; REVIEW; SPHINCTEROTOMY;

BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; CALCULI; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENDOSCOPES; ENDOSCOPY, DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATIC DUCTS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34247531333     PISSN: 15228037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11894-007-0008-1     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, et al.: Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 2004, 54:8-29.
2. Freelove R, Walling AD: Pancreatic cancer: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 2006, 73:8485-492.
3. Sohn TA, Yeo Qj, Cameron JL, et al.: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: an increasingly recognized clinicopathologic entity. Ann Surg 2001, 234:8313-321.
4. Eloubeidi MA, Hawes RH: Mucinous tumors of the exocrine pancreas. Cancer Control 2000, 7:445-451.
5. Mukai H, Yasuda K, Nakajima M: Differential diagnosis of mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas by intraductal ultrasonography and peroral pancreatoscopy. Endoscopy 1998, 30(Suppl 1):A99-A102.
6. Yamao K, Nakamura T, Suzuki T, et al.: Endoscopic diagnosis and staging of mucinous cystic neoplasms and intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2003, 10:142-146.
7. Yamaguchi T, Hara T, Tsuyuguchi T, et al.: Peroral pancreatoscopy in the diagnosis of mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2000, 52:67-73.
8. Li D, Xie K, Wolff R, Abbruzzese JL: Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 2004, 363:1049-1057.
9. Lim JE, Chien MW, Earle CC: Prognostic factors following curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based, linked database analysis of 396 patients. Ann Surg 2003, 237:74-85.
10. Klinkenbijl JH, Jeekel J, Sahmoud T, et al.: Adjuvant radio-therapy and 5-fluorouracil after curative resection of cancer of the pancreas and periampullary region: phase III trial of the EORTC gastrointestinal tract cancer cooperative group. Ann Surg 1999, 230:776-782.
11. Goh BK, Tan YM, Chung YF: Utility of fusion CT-PET in the diagnosis of small pancreatic carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2005, 11:3800-3802.
12. Kwon RS, Scheiman IM: New advances in pancreatic imaging. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2006, 22:512-519.
13. Kinney TP, Lai R, Freeman ML: Endoscopic approach to acute pancreatitis. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2006, 6:119-135.
14. Adler DG, Lichtenstein D, Baron TH, et al.: The role of endoscopy in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:933-937.
15. Kodama T, Tatsumi Y, Kozarek RA, Riemann JF: Direct pancreatoscopy. Endoscopy 2002, 34:653-660.
16. Ramsay D, Marshall M, Song S, et al.: Identification and staging of pancreatic tumours using computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound and mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Australas Radiol 2004, 48:154-161.
17. Maguchi H: The roles of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2004, 11:1-3.
18. Borbath I, Van Beers BE, Lonneux M, et al.: Preoperative assessment of pancreatic tumors using magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasonography, positron emission tomography and laparoscopy. Pancreatology 2005, 5:553-561.
19. Dewitt J, Devereaux BM, Lehman GA, et al.: Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006, 4:717-725.
20. Hocke M, Schulze E, Gottschalk P, et al.: Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2006, 12:246-250.
21. Afify AM, al-Khafaji BM, Kim B, Scheiman JM: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas. Diagnostic utility and accuracy. Acta Cytol 2003, 47:341-348.
22. Eloubeidi MA, Jhala D, Chhieng DC, et al.: Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer 2003, 99:285-292.
23. Klapman JB, Chang KJ, Lee JG, Nguyen P: Negative predictive value of endoscopic ultrasound in a large series of patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100:2658-2661.
24. Qian X, Hecht JL: Pancreatic fine needle aspiration. A comparison of computed tomographic and endoscopic ultrasonographic guidance. Acta Cytol 2003, 47:723-726.
25. Volmar KE, Vollmer RT, Jowell PS, et al. Pancreatic FNA in 1000 cases: a comparison of imaging modalities. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:854-861.
26. Sperti C, Pasquali C, Di Prima F, et al.: Percutaneous CT-guided fine needle aspiration cytology in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. Ital J Gastroenterol 1994, 26:126-131.
27. Horwhat JD, Paulson EK, McGrath K, et al.: A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:966-975.
28. Farrell JJ: Diagnosing pancreatic malignancy in the setting of chronic pancreatitis: is there room for improvement? Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62:737-741.
29. Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Eloubeidi MA: Yield of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses in the presence or the absence of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62:728-736.
30. Lai R, Stanley MW, Bardales R, et al.: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct aspiration: diagnostic yield and safety. Endoscopy 2002, 34:715-720.
31. Pugliese V, Pujic N, Saccomanno S, et al.: Pancreatic intraductal sampling during ERCP in patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer: cytologic studies and k-ras-2 codon 12 molecular analysis in 47 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 54:595-599.
32. Van Laethem JL, Vertongen P, Deviere J, et al.: Detection of c-Ki-ras gene codon 12 mutations from pancreatic duct brushings in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumours. Gut 1995, 36:781-787.
33. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Montes H, et al.: Accuracy and complication rate of brush cytology from bile duct versus pancreatic duct. Gastrointest Endosc 1999, 49:322-327.
34. Logrono R, Kurtycz DF, Molina CP, et al.: Analysis of false-negative diagnoses on endoscopic brush cytology of biliary and pancreatic duct strictures: the experience at 2 university hospitals. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000, 124:387-392.
35. Macken E, Drijkoningen M, Van Aken E, Van Steenbergen W: Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2000, 63:254-259.
36. Gress TM: Molecular diagnosis of pancreatobiliary malignancics in brush cytologies of biliary strictures. Gut 2004, 53:1727-1729.
37. McGuire DE, Venu RP, Brown RD, et al.: Brush cytology for pancreatic carcinoma: an analysis of factors influencing results. Gastrointest Endosc 1996, 44:300-304.
38. DeWitt J, McGreevy K, LeBlanc J, et al.: EUS-guided Trucut biopsy of suspected nonfocal chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62:76-84.
39. Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N, et al.: Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy 2004, 36:397-401.
40. Kubota Y, Takaoka M, Tani K, et al.: Endoscopic transpapillary biopsy for diagnosis of patients with pancreaticobiliary ductal strictures. Am J Gastroenterol 1993, 88:1700-1704.
41. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Wada N, et al.: Endoscopic transpapillary bile duct biopsy without sphincterotomy for diagnosing biliary strictures; a prospective comparative study with bile and brush cytology. Am J Gastroenterol 1996, 91:465-467.
42. Schoefl. R, Haefner M, Wrba F, et al.: Forceps biopsy and brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of biliary stenoses. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997, 32:363-368.
43. Atia GN, Brown RD, Alrashid A, et al.: The role of pancreatoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of the pancreas. J Clin Gastroenterol 2002, 35:175-179.
44. Yamaguchi T, Shirai Y, Ishihara T, et al.: Pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: significance of sampling by peroral pancreatoscopy. Cancer 2005, 104:2830-2836.
45. Hara T, Yamaguchi T, Ishihara T, et al.: Diagnosis and patient management of intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor of the pancreas by using peroral pancreatoscopy and intraductal ultrasonography. Gastroenterology 2002, 122:34-43.
46. Chaparala RP, Patel R, Guthrie JA, et al.: Solitary main pancreatic ductal calculus of possible biliary origin causing acute pancreatitis. JOP 2005, 6:445-448.
47. Sarles H, Bernard JP, Gullo L: Pathogenesis of chronic pancreatitis. Gut 1990, 31:629-632.
48. Guda NM, Partington S, Freeman ML: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of chronic calcific pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. JOP 2005, 6:6-12.
49. Dite P, Ruzicka M, Zboril V, Novotny I: A prospective, randomized trial comparing endoscopic and surgical therapy for chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2003, 35:553-558.
50. Farrell JJ, Bounds BC, Al-Shalabi S, et al.: Single-operator duodenoscope-assisted cholangioscopy is an effective alternative in the management of choledocholithiasis not removed by conventional methods, includimg mechanical lithotripsy. Endoscopy 2005, 37:542-547.
51. Awadallah NS, Chen YK, Piraka C, et al.: Is there a role for cholangioscopy in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis? Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:284-291.
52. Piraka C, Awadallah NS, Chen YK, et al.: Cholangioscopy (CP) with electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) in patients with difficult bile duct stones. Gastroinest Endosc 2005, 61:AB217.
53. Arya N, Nelles SE, Haber GB, Kim YI, Kortan PK: Electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 111 patients: a safe and effective therapy for difficult bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:2330-2334.
54. Howell DA, Dy RM, Hanson BL, et al.: Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic duct stones using a 10F pancreatoscope and electrohydrautic lithotripsy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999, 50:829-833.
55. Lehman GA: Role of ERCP and other endoscopic modalities in chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56:S237-S240.
56. Delhaye M, Arvanitakis M, Verset G, et al.: Long-term clinical outcome after endoscopic pancreatic ductal drainage for patients with painful chronic pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004, 2:1096-1106.
57. Shah RJ, Langer DA, Antillon MR, Chen YK: Pancreatoscopy with electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL): primary or adjunctive therapy for pancreatic stones? Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:AB204.
58. Uehara H, Nakaizumi A, Tatsuta M, et al.: Diagnosis of carcinoma in situ of the pancreas by peroral pancreatoscopy and pancreatoscopic cytology. Cancer 1997, 79:454-461.
59. Kaneko T, Nakao A, Nomoto S, et al.: Intraoperative pancreatoscopy with the ultrathin pancreatoscope for mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas. Arch Surg 1998, 133:263-267.
60. Kodama T, Tatsumi Y, Sato H, et al.: Initial experience with a new peroral electronic pancreatoscope with an accessory channel. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:895-900.
61. Kodama T, Sato H, Horii Y, et al.: Pancreatoscopy for the next generation: development of the peroral electronic pancreatoscope system. Gastrointest Endosc 1999, 49:366-371.
62. Kodama T, Koshitani T, Sato H, et al.: Electronic pancreatoscopy for the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:617-622.
63. Kodama T, Abe M, Sato H, et al.: A case of pseudotumorous pancreatitis that presented unique pancreatoscopic findings with the peroral electronic pancreatoscope. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003, 18:108-111.
64. Chen YK: Preclinical characterization of the SpyGlass peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for direct access, visualization and biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 65:303-311.
65. Chen YK, Pleskow DKL: Results from the first human use clinical series utilizing a new peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system (Spyglass Direct Visualization System). Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63: AB88.
66. Chen YK, Pleskow D: Six month results from a first human use series utilizing a new peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system (SpyGlass Direct Visualization System). Gut 2006, 38(Suppl 2):A313.
67. Press Release. Olympus America, Inc. January 23, 2006. Available at http://www.olympusamerica.com/msg↘ction/ msgΡessDetails.asp?pressNo=449. Accessed 1/4/07.