Confidentiality challenges and good clinical practices in human subjects research: Striking a balance

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 1-4

  Shaughnessy, Marianne ^a,b   Beidler, Susan M ^c   Gibbs, Karen ^a   Michael, Kathleen ^b  

^a BALTIMORE VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^c FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Confidentiality; Research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONFLICT; DEPRESSION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH INSURANCE; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIVACY; RESEARCH PRIORITY; RESEARCH SUBJECT; STROKE; STROKE PATIENT;

CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONFIDENTIALITY; HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; THERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34247528172     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1402-1     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. NIH. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) privacy rule. 45 C.F.R. § 160 and 164 (2004).
2. Rogers W. Pressures on confidentiality. Lancet. 2006;367:553-554.
3. Wilson J. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act privacy rules causes concerns among clinicians and researchers. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 145:313-316.
4. Artnak K, Benson M. Evaluating HIPAA compliance: a guide for researchers, privacy boards and IRBs. Nurs Outlook. 2005;2:79-87.