Random regression models for detection of gene by environment interaction

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 105-121

  Lillehammer, Marie ^a   Ødegård, Jørgen ^a   Meuwissen, Theo H E ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Gene by environment interaction; QTL detection; Random regression; Reaction norms

Indexed keywords

DETECTION METHOD; ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; GENE; MODEL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROSS BREEDING; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; CROSSES, GENETIC; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 34247525182     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/gse:2006037     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bidanel J.P., Ducos A., Genetic correlations between test station and on-farm performance traits in Large White and French Landrace pig breeds, Livest. Prod. Sci. 45 (1996) 55-62.
2. Bryant J., López-Villalobos N., Holmes C., Pryce J., Simulation modelling of dairy cattle performance based on knowledge of genotype, environment and genotype by environment interactions: current status, Agr. Syst. 86 (2005) 121-143.
3. Buitenhuis A.J., Lund M.S., Labouriau R., Petersen A.H., Madsen L.B., Panitz F., Bendixen C., Comparing body weight measured as single time point versus modelled as a longitudinal trait for QTL detection in pigs, EAAP 55th Annual Meeting, 5-9 September 2004, Bled, Slovenia.
4. Calus M.P.L., Veerkamp R.F., Estimation of environmental sensitivity of genetic merit for milk production traits using a random regression model, J. Dairy Sci. 86 (2003) 3756-3764.
5. Calus M.P.L., Groen A.F., de Jong G., Genotype x environment interaction for protein yield in Dutch Dairy Cattle as quantified by different models, J. Dairy Sci. 85 (2002) 3115-3123.
6. Castillo-Juarez H., Oltenacu P.A., Blake R.W., McCulloch C.E., Cienfuegos-Rivas E.G., Effect of herd environment on the genetic and phenotypic relationships among milk yield, conception rate, and somatic cell score in Holstein Cattle, J. Dairy Sci 83 (2000) 807-814.
7. Fikse W.F., Rekaya R., Weigel K.A., Genotype x environment interaction for milk production in Guernsey Cattle, J. Dairy Sci. 86 (2003) 1821-1827.
8. Gilmour A.R., Cullis B.R., Welham S.J., Thompson R., ASREML reference manual (2001).
9. Goddard M.E., The validity of genetic models underlying quantitative traits, Livest. Prod. Sci. 72 (2001) 117-127.
10. Grignola F.E., Zhang Q., Hoeschele I., Mapping linked quantitative trait loci via residual maximum likelihood, Genet. Sel. Evol. 29 (1997) 529-544.
11. Jiang C., Zeng Z.-B., Multiple trait analysis of genetic mapping for quantitative trait loci, Genetics 140 (1995) 1111-1127.
12. de Jong G., Phenotypic plasticity as a product of selection in a variable environment, Am. Nat. 145 (1995) 493-512.
13. Kolmodin R., Strandberg E., Madsen P., Jensen J., Jorjani H., Genotype by environment interaction in Nordic Dairy Cattle studied using reaction norms, Acta Agric. Scand., Section A Anim. Sci. 52 (2002) 11-24.
14. Lund M.S., Sørensen P., Madsen P., Linkage analysis in longitudinal data using random regression, in: Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, 19-23 August 2002, France.
15. Lynch M., Walsh B., Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 1998.
16. Macaranas J.M., Mather P.B., Lal S.N., Vereivalu T., Lagibalavu M., Capra M.F., Genotype and environment: A comparative evaluation of four tilapia stocks in Fiji, Aquaculture 150 (1997) 11-24.
17. Meuwissen T.H.E., Goddard M.E., Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using linkage disequilibria with closely linked marker loci, Genetics 155 (2000) 421-430.
18. Meuwissen T.H.E., Karlsen A., Lien S., Olsaker I., Goddard M.E., Fine mapping of a quantitative trait locus for twinning rate using combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping, Genetics 161 (2002) 373-379.
19. Pollott G.E., Greeff J.C., Genotype x environment interactions and genetic parameters for fecal egg count and production traits of Merino sheep, J. Anim. Sci. 82 (2004) 2840-2851.
20. Via S., Gomulkiewicz R., de Jong G., Scheiner S.M., Schlichting C.D., van Tienderen P.H., Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy, Trends Ecol. Evol. 10 (1995) 212-217.
21. Wang D.L., Zhu J., Li Z.K., Paterson A.H., Mapping QTLs with epistatic effects and QTLxenvironment interactions by mixed linear model approaches, Theor. Appl. Genet. 99 (1999) 1255-1264.
22. Windig J.J., Calus M.P.L., Veerkamp R.F., Influence of herd environment on health and fertility and their relationship with milk production, J. Dairy Sci. 88 (2005) 335-347.
23. Yang J., Zhu J., Methods for predicting superior genotypes under multiple environments based on QTL effects, Theor. Appl. Genet. 110 (2005) 1268-1274.
24. Zwald N.R., Weigel K.A., Fikse W.F., Rekaya R., Identification of factors that cause genotype by environment interaction between herds of Holstein Cattle in seventeen countries, J. Dairy Sci. 86 (2003) 1009-1018.