Use of LIDAR-derived images for mapping old landslides under forest

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 754-769

  Van Den Eeckhaut, Miet ^a,b   Poesen, J ^a   Verstraeten, G ^a,b   Vanacker, V ^c   Nyssen, J ^a   Moeyersons, J ^d   van Beek, L P H ^e   Vandekerckhove, L ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b FUND FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^d ROYAL MUSEUM FOR CENTRAL AFRICA   (Belgium)

^e UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^f Ministry of Flanders   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Deep seated landslides; Expert knowledge; Hillshade map; Landslide inventory map; LIDAR; Old

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; GEOMORPHOLOGY; MAPPING; OPTICAL RADAR; RADAR IMAGING; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY;

DEEP-SEATED LANDSLIDES; EXPERT KNOWLEDGE; HILLSHADE MAP; LANDSLIDE INVENTORY MAP; LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING;

LANDSLIDES;

FORESTRY; GEOMORPHOLOGY; LANDSLIDES; MAPPING; OPTICAL RADAR; RADAR IMAGING; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY;

GIS; LANDSLIDE; LIDAR; REMOTE SENSING; TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING;

EARTH MOVEMENT; FORESTS; GEOLOGY; MAPPING; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS; RADAR; TOPOGRAPHY;

EID: 34247523847     PISSN: 01979337     EISSN: 10969837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/esp.1417     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Carrara A, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P. 2002. Impact of mapping errors on the reliability of landslide hazard maps. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 2: 3-14.
2. Carrara A, Cardinali M, Detti R, Guzzetti F, Pasqui V, Reichenbach P. 1992. GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 16: 427-445.
3. Carrara A, Cardinali M, Guzzetti F, Reichenback P. 1995. GIS technology in mapping landslide hazard. In Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards, Carrara A, Guzzetti F (eds). Kluwer: Dordrecht; 135-176.
4. Carter W, Shrestha R, Tuell G, Bloomquist D, Sartori M. 2001. Airborne Laser Swath mapping shines new light on earth's surface. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 82: 549, 550, 555.
5. Crozier JM. 2005. Management frameworks for landslide hazard and risk: Issues and options. In Landslide Hazard and Risk, Glade T, Anderson M, Crozier MJ (eds). John Wiley and Sons: Chichester; 331-350.
6. Cruden DM, Varnes DJ. 1996. Landslide Types and Processes. In Landslides, Investigation and Mitigation, Transportation Research Board, Turner, AK, Schuster RL (eds). National Research Council, Special Report 247. National Academy Press: Washington, DC; 36-71.
7. DEM of Flanders. 2005. MVG-LIN-AWZ and MVG-LIN-AMINAL (GIS-Vlaanderen). http://www.gisvlaanderen.be/gis/diensten/geovlaanderen/?artid=240 [10 January 2006].
8. Demoulin A, Pissart A, Schroeder C. 2003. On the origin of late Quaternary paleolandslides in the Liège (E Belgium) area. International Journal of Earth Science 92: 795-805. DOI: 10.1007/s00531-003-0354-7.
9. GIS-Vlaanderen. 2003. Nieuwsbrief GIS-Vlaanderen: Digitaal Hoogtemodel Vlaanderen. Ondersteunend Centrum GIS-Vlaanderen: Gent. http://www.gisvlaanderen.be/gis/diensten/geo-vlaanderen/?artid=240
10. Glenn NF, Streutker DR, Chadwick J, Glenn DJ, Thackray GD, Dorsch SJ. 2006. Analysis of LiDAR-derived topographic information for characterizing and differentiating landslide morphology and activity. Geomorphology 73: 131-148. DOI: 10.1016/ j.geomorph.2005.07.006.
11. Gold RD. 2004. A Comparative Study of Aerial Photographs and LIDAR Imagery for Landslide Detection in the Puget Lowland, Washington. Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources. Open File Report 2004-6.
12. Guzzetti F, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P, Carrara A. 2000. Comparing landslide maps: a case study in the Upper Tiber River Basin, Central Italy. Environmental Management 25: 247-263. DOI: 10.1007/ s002679910020.
13. Haneberg WC. 2005. The ins and outs of airborne LIDAR: An introduction for practicing engineering geologists. AEG news 48: 16-19.
14. Haneberg WC, Creighton AL, Medley EW, Jonas DA. 2005. Use of LIDAR to assess slope hazards at the Lihir gold mine, Papua New Guinea. Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Landslide Risk Management, Vancouver, May/June 2005.
15. Haugerud RA, Harding DJ, Johnson SY, Harless JL, Weaver CS, Sherrod BL. 2003. High resolution LIDAR topography of the Puget Lowland, Washington - a bonanza for earth science. GSA Today 13: 4-10.
16. Hodgson ME, Jensen JA, Schmidt L, Schill S, Davis B. 2003. An evaluation of LIDAR- and IFSAR-derived digital elevation models in leafon conditions with USGS Level 1 and Level 2 DEMs. Remote Sensing of Environment 84: 295-308.
17. IAEG Commission on Landslides. 1990. Suggested nomenclature for landslides.Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology 41: 13-16.
18. IWONL. 1987. Text Clarifying the Belgian Soil Map, Map Sheet 98E Ronse (in Dutch). Uitgegeven onder de auspiciën van het Instituut tot aanmoediging van her Wetenschappelijk onderzoek in Nijverheid en Landbouw: Brussels.
19. Jacobs P, De Ceukelaire M, De Breuck W, De Moor G. 1999. Text Clarifying the Belgian Geological Map, Flemish Region, Map Sheet 29 Kortrijk, Map Scale 1/50 000 (in Dutch). Ministerie van Economische zaken en Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap: Brussels.
20. Keaton JR, DeGraff JV. 1996. Surface observation and geologic mapping. In Landslides, Investigation and Mitigation, Transportation Research Board, Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds). National Research Council, Special Report 247. National Academy Press: Washington, DC; 128-230.
21. McKean J, Roering J. 2004. Objective landslide detection and surface morphology mapping using high-resolution airborne laser altimetry. Geomorphology 47: 331-351. DOI: 10.1016/ S0169-555X(03)00164-8.
22. Metternicht G, Hurni L, Gogu R. 2005. Remote sensing of landslides: An analysis of the potential contribution to geo-spatial systems for hazard assessment in mountainous environments. Remote Sensing of Environment 98: 284-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.004.
23. NGI (National Geographical Institute), 1972. Topographical map of Belgium (1:10 000). Sheets 29/3-4-7-8 and 30/1-2-5-6. National Geographical Institute: Brussels.
24. Ost L, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Poesen J, Vanmaercke-Gottigny MC. 2003. Characteristics and spatial distribution of large landslides in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium). Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie 47: 329-350.
25. Rowlands KA, Jones LD, Whitworth M. 2003. Landslide laser scanning: a new look at an old problem. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 36: 155-157.
26. Schulz WH. 2004. Landslides mapped using LIDAR imagery, Seattle, Washington. United States Geological Survey, Open File Report 2004-1396.
27. Schuster RL, Kockelman WJ. 1996. Principles of landslide hazard reduction. In Landslides Investigation and Mitigation, Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds). National Research Council, Special Report 247. National Academy Press: Washington, DC; 91-103.
28. Thoma DP, Gupta SC, Bauer ME, Kirchoff CE. 2005. Airborne laser scanning for riverbank erosion assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment 95: 493-501. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.01.012.
29. Vanacker V, Vanderschraeghe M, Govers G, Willems E, Poesen J, Deckers J, De Bievre B. 2003. Linking hydrological, infinite slope stability and land-use change models through GIS for assessing the impact of deforestation on slope stability in high Andes watersheds. Geomorphology 52: 299-315. DOI: 10.1016/ S0169-555X(02)00263-5.
30. Van Den Eeckhaut M, Poesen J, Verstraeten G, Vanacker V, Moeyersons J, Nyssen J, Van Beek LPH. 2005. The effectiveness of hillshade maps and expert knowledge in mapping old deep-seated landslides. Geomorphology 67: 351-363. DOI: 10.1016/ j.geomorph.2004.11.001.
31. Vanmaercke-Gottigny MC. 1980. Landslides as a morphogenetic phenomenon in a hilly region of Flanders (Belgium). In Assessment of Erosion, De Bood M, Gabriel D (eds). John Wiley and Sons: Chichester; 475-484.
32. Vanmaercke-Gottigny MC. 1995. Detailed geomorphological mapping as a scientific investigation method, a case study: the maps 'Geraardsbergen' and 'Kortrijk'. PhD thesis, Faculty for Sciences, V.U.B., Brussels.
33. van Westen CJ, Seijmonsbergen AC, Mantovani F. 1999. Comparing landslide hazard maps. Natural Hazards 20: 137-158. DOI: 10.1023/ A:1008036810401.
34. White SA, Wang Y. 2003. Utilizing DEMs derived from LIDAR data to analyse morphologic change in the North Carolina coastline. Remote Sensing of Environment 85: 39-47. DOI: 10.1016/ S0034-4257(02)00185-2.
35. Wills CJ, McCrink TP. 2002. Comparing landslide inventories, the map depends on the method. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience 8:279-293.
36. Zêzere JL. 2002. Landslide susceptibility assessment considering landslide typology, a case study in the area north of Lisbon (Portugal). Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 2: 73-82.