Can population genetic structure be predicted from life-history traits?

American Naturalist

Volumn 169, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 662-672

  Duminil, Jérôme ^a   Fineschi, Silvia ^b   Hampe, Arndt ^c   Jordano, Pedro ^c   Salvini, Daniela ^d   Vendramin, Giovanni G ^e   Petit, Rémy J ^a  

^a UMR 1202 BIOGECO   (France)

^b INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE PLANT PROTECTION   (Italy)

^c DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

^d DANISH FOREST LANDSCAPE RES INST   (Denmark)

^e CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Chloroplast markers; Comparative method; Independent contrasts; Nuclear markers; Pollen dispersal; Seed dispersal

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC STRUCTURE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; PHYLOGENETICS; POLLINATION; POPULATION GENETICS; RELATEDNESS; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEED DISPERSAL;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANGIOSPERMS; EVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; GENETICS, POPULATION; GEOGRAPHY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

SPERMATOPHYTA;

EID: 34247518654     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/513490     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abouheif, E. 1999. A method for testing the assumption of phylogenetic independence in comparative data. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1:895-909.
2. Ackerly, D. D. 2000. Taxon sampling, correlated evolution, and independent contrast. Evolution 54:1480-1492.
3. Aguinagalde, I., A. Hampe, A. Mohanty, J. P. Martin, J. Duminil, and R. J. Petit. 2005. Effects of life history traits and species distribution on genetic structure at maternally inherited markers in European trees and shrubs. Journal of Biogeography 32:329-339.
4. Arduino, P., F. Verra, R. Cianchi, W. Rossi, B. Corrias, and L. Bullini. 1996. Genetic variation and natural hybridization between Orchis laxiflora and Orchis palustris (Orchidaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 202:87-109.
5. Austerlitz, F., S. Mariette, N. Machon, P. H. Gouyon, and B. Godelle. 2000. Effects of colonization processes on genetic diversity: differences between annual plants and tree species. Genetics 154: 1309-1321.
6. Barrett, S. C. H. 1998. The evolution of mating strategies in flowering plants. Trends in Plant Science 3:335-341.
7. Barrett, S. C. H., L. D. Harder, and A. C. Worley. 1996. The comparative biology of pollination and mating in flowering plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 351:1271-1280.
8. Bell, G. 1989. A comparative method. American Naturalist 133:553-571.
9. Bohonak, A. J. 1999. Dispersal, gene flow, and population structure. Quarterly Review of Biology 74:21-45.
10. Bossema, I. 1979. Jays and oaks: an eco-ethological study of a symbiosis. Behaviour 70:1-117.
11. Chambers, J. C., and J. A. MacMahon. 1994. A day in the life of a seed: movements and fates of seeds and their implications for natural and managed systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25:263-292.
12. Charlesworth, D. 2003. Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 358:1051-1070.
13. Cole, C. T. 2003. Genetic variation in rare and common plants. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 34:213-237.
14. de Queiroz, A. 2002. Contingent predictability in evolution: key traits and diversification. Systematic Biology 51:917-929.
15. Eriksson, O., E. M. Friis, and P. Lofgren. 2000. Seed size, fruit size, and dispersal systems in angiosperms from the Early Cretaceous to the Late Tertiary. American Naturalist 156:47-58.
16. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125:1-15.
17. Freckleton, R. P., P. H. Harvey, and M. Pagel. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. American Naturalist 160:712-726.
18. Garland, T., Jr., P. H. Harvey, and A. Ives. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Systematic Biology 41:18-32.
19. Garland, T., Jr., A. F. Bennett, and E. L. Rezende. 2005. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. Journal of Experimental Biology 208:3015-3035.
20. Gitzendanner, M. A., and P. S. Soltis. 2000. Patterns of genetic variation in rare and widespread plant congeners. American Journal of Botany 87:783-792.
21. Goodwin, B. J., A. J. McAllister, and L. Fahrig. 1999. Predicting invasiveness of plant species based on biological information. Conservation Biology 13:422-426.
22. Greene, D. F., and E. A. Johnson. 1995. Long-distance wind dispersal of tree seeds. Canadian Journal of Botany 73:1036-1045.
23. Hamilton, M. A., B. R. Murray, M. W. Cadotte, G. C. Hose, A. C. Baker, C. J. Harris, and D. Licari. 2005. Life-history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales. Ecology Letters 8:1066-1074.
24. Hampe, A. 2004. Extensive hydrochory uncouples spatiotemporal patterns of seedfall and seedling recruitment in a "bird-dispersed" riparian tree. Journal of Ecology 92:797-807.
25. Hamrick, J. L., and M. J. W. Godt. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species. Pages 43-63 in A. H. D. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler, and B. S. Weir, eds. Plant population genetics, breeding and germplasm resources. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
26. _. 1996. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 351:1291-1298.
27. Hamrick, J. L., and J. D. Nason. 1996. Consequences of dispersal in plants. Pages 203-236 in O. E. Rhodes, R. K. Chesser, and M. H. Smith, eds. Population dynamics in ecological space and time. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
28. Hamrick, J. L., M. J. W. Godt, M. D. A. Murawski, and M. D. Loveless. 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests 6:95-124.
29. Hamrick, J. L., D. A. Murawski, and J. D. Nason. 1993. The influence of seed dispersal mechanisms on the genetic structure of tropical tree populations. Vegetatio 107/108:281-297.
30. Hedren, M. 2001. Systematics of the Dactylorhiza euxina/incarnata/ maculata polyploid complex (Orchidaceae) in Turkey: evidence from allozyme data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 229:23-44.
31. Hedren, M., M. F. Fay, and M. W. Chase. 2001. Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) reveal details of polyploid evolution in Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 88: 1868-1880.
32. Hewitt, G. 2000. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907-913.
33. Higgins, S. I., S. Lavorel, and E. Revilla. 2003. Estimating plant migration rates under habitat loss and fragmentation. Oikos 101: 354-366.
34. Housworth, E. A., E. P. Martins, and M. Lynch. 2004. The phylogenetic mixed model. American Naturalist 163:84-96.
35. Ihaka, A., and R. Gentleman. 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 5:299-314.
36. Jordano, P. 1995. Angiosperm fleshy fruits and seed dispersers: a comparative analysis of adaptation and constraints in plant-animal interactions. American Naturalist 145:163-191.
37. Liston, A., W. A. Robinson, D. Pinero, and E. R. Alvarez-Buylla. 1999. Phylogenetics of Pinus (Pinaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11:95-109.
38. Loveless, M. D., and J. L. Hamrick. 1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:65-95.
39. Manos, P. S., J. J. Doyle, and K. C. Nixon. 1999. Phytogeny, biogeography, and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12:333-349.
40. Martins, E. P., and T. Garland Jr. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45:534-557.
41. Moles, A. T., D. D. Ackerly, C. O. Webb, J. C. Tweddle, J. B. Dickie, and M. Westoby. 2005. A brief history of seed size. Science 307: 576-580.
42. Morales, E. 2000. Estimating phylogenetic inertia in Thitonia (Asteraceae): a comparative approach. Evolution 54:475-484.
43. Moyle, L. C. 2006. Correlates of genetic differentiation and isolation by distance in 17 congeneric Silene species. Molecular Ecology 15: 1067-1081.
44. Muth, N. Z., and M. Pigliucci. 2006. Traits of invasives reconsidered: phenotypic comparisons of introduced invasives and introduced noninvasive plant species within two closely related clades. American Naturalist 93:188-196.
45. Nybom, H. 2004. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Molecular Ecology 13:1143-1155.
46. Nybom, H., and I. V. Bartish. 2000. Effects of life history traits and sampling strategies on genetic diversity estimates obtained with RAPD markers in plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics 3/2:93-114.
47. Pacheco, L. F., and J. A. Simonetti. 2000. Genetic structure of a mimosoid tree deprived of its seed disperser, the spider monkey. Conservation Biology 14:1766-1775.
48. Paradis, E., and J. Claude. 2002. Analysis of comparative data using generalized estimating equations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 218:175-185.
49. Petit, R. J., and G. G. Vendramin. 2006. Phylogeography of organelle DNA in plants: an introduction. Pages 23-97 in S. Weiss and N. Ferrand, eds. Phylogeography of southern European refugia. Springer, Vienna.
50. Petit, R. J., I. Aguinagalde, J. L. de Beaulieu, C. Bittkau, S. Brewer, R. Cheddadi, R. Ennos, et al. 2003. Glacial refugia: hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity. Science 300:1563-1565.
51. Petit, R. J., A. Hampe, and R. Cheddadi. 2005a. Climate changes and tree phylogeography in the Mediterranean. Taxon 54:877-885.
52. Petit, R. J., J. Duminil, S. Fineschi, A. Hampe, D. Salvini, and G. G. Vendramin. 2005b. Comparative organisation of chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear diversity in plant populations. Molecular Ecology 14:689-711.
53. Purvis, A., and A. Rambaud. 1995. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysis of comparative data. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 11:247-251.
54. Rees, M., R. Condit, M. Crawley, S. Pacala, and D. Tilman. 2001. Long-term studies of vegetation dynamics. Science 293:650-655.
55. Renner, S. S., and R. E. Ricklefs. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 82:596-606.
56. Rieseberg, L. H. 1991. Homoploid reticulate evolution in Helianthus (Asteraceae): evidence from ribosomal genes. American Journal of Botany 78:1218-1237.
57. Schilling, E. E., and C. R. Linder. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships in Helianthus (Asteraceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequence data. Systematic Botany 23:177-187.
58. Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, M. W. Chase, M. E. Mort, D. C. Albach, M. Zanis, V. Savolainen, et al. 2000. Angiosperm phytogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133:381-461.
59. Soltis, D. E., R. K. Kuzoff, M. E. Mort, M. Zanis, M. Fishbein, L. Hufford, J. Koontz, and M. K. Arroyo. 2001. Elucidating deep-level phylogenetic relationships in Saxifragaceae using sequences for six chloroplastic and nuclear DNA regions. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 88:669-693.
60. Stebbins, G. L. 1965. Colonizing species of the native California flora. Pages 173-191 in H. G. Baker and L. G. Stebbins, eds. The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York.
61. SYSTAT. 2002. SYSTAT for Windows. Version 10.2. Statistics. SYSTAT, Evanston, IL.
62. Vamosi, J. C., S. P. Otto, and S. C. H. Barrett. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of the ecological correlates of dioecy in angiosperms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16:1006-1018.
63. Vogler, D. W., and S. Kalisz. 2001. Sex among the flowers: the distribution of plant mating systems. Evolution 55:202-204.
64. Wahlund, S. 1928. Zusammensetzung von Population und Korrelationserscheinung vom Standpunkt der Vererbungslehre aus betrachtet. Hereditas 11:65-106.
65. Wang, B. C., and T. B. Smith. 2002. Closing the seed dispersal loop. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:379-385.
66. Wang, X. R., and A. E. Szmidt. 1993. Chloroplast DNA-based phytogeny of Asian Pinus species (Pinaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 188:197-211.
67. Westoby, M., M. Leishman, and J. Lord. 1996. Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 351:1309-1317.
68. Wright, S. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15:323-354.
69. _. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regards to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395-420.