Effect of new photocatalytic coagulant on NF membrane fouling

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 46, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 2280-2285

  Choi, In Hwan ^a,b   Lee, Su Min ^a   Kim, In Chul ^a   Min, Byoung Ryul ^b   Lee, Kew Ho ^a  

^a Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COAGULATION; NANOPARTICLES; PHOTOCATALYSIS; SOL-GEL PROCESS; SOLUTIONS; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

HUMIC ACIDS (HA); NATURAL ORGANIC MATTER (NOM); SOLUTION CHEMISTRY;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

COAGULATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; NANOPARTICLES; PHOTOCATALYSIS; SOL-GEL PROCESS; SOLUTIONS; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

EID: 34247509699     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie060917s     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Potts, D. E.; Ahlert, R. C.; Wang, S. S. A critical review of fouling of reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 1981, 36, 235-264.
2. Thorsen T. Removal of humic substances with membranes system, use and experiences. Proceedings of membrane technology conference, Suppl., American Water Works Association: Baltimore, MD, 1993; pp 131-143.
3. Sinha, M. K. Organo-metallic phosphates. Plant Soil 1971, 35, 471.
4. Leenheer, J. A.; Brown, P. A.; Noyes, T. I. In Aquatic humic substances: influence on fate and treatment of pollutants; Suffet, I. M., MacCarthy, P., Eds.; American Chemical Society; Washington, DC, 1989; pp 25-40.
5. Aiken, G. R.; McKnight, D. M.; Wershaw, R. L.; MacCarthy, E. Humic Substances in Soil, Sediment, and Water, Wiley; New York, 1985.
6. Nystrom, M.; Ruohomaki, K.; Kaipia, L. Humic acid as a fouling agent in filtration. Desalination 1996, 106, 79-87.
7. Schlesinger, W. H. Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 1991.
8. Weber, J. H. Binding and transport of metals by humic material. In Humic Substances and their Role in the Environment; Frimmel, F. H., Christman, R. F., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, U.K., 1998; pp 165-178.
9. Schlautman, M. A.; Morgan, J. J. Effects of aqueous chemistry on the binding of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by dissolved humic materials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1993, 27, 961-969.
10. Murphy, E. M.; Zachara, J. M. The role of sorbed humic substances on the distribution of organic and inorganic contaminants in groundwater. Geoderma 1995, 67, 103-124.
11. Stevenson, F. J. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1994.
12. Clapp, C. E.; Hayes, M. B. H. Sizes and shapes of humic substances. Soil Sci. 1999, 164, 777-789.
13. Swift, R. S. Organic matter characterization. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods; Sparts, D. L., Ed.; SSSA Book Series 5; Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, 1996.
14. Saar, R. A.; Weber, J. H. Comparison of spectrofluorometry and ion-selective electrode potentiometry for determination of complexes between fulvic acid and heavy-metal ions. Anal. Chem. 1980, 52, 2095.
15. Dennett, K. E.; Amirtharajah, A.; Moran, T. F.; Gould, J. P. J.Am. Water Works Assoc. 1996, 88, 129.
16. van Benschoten, J. E.; Edzwald, J. K. Chemical aspects of coagulation using aluminum salts-II. Coagulation of fulvic acid using alum and polyaluminum chloride. Water Res. 1990, 24, 1527.
17. Mallevialle, J.; Anselme, C.; Marsigny, O. Effects of humic substances on membrane processes. In Aquatic Humic Substances: Influence on Fate and Treatment of Pollutants; Suffet, I. H., MacCarthy, P., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1989; pp 749-767.
18. Bersillon, J. L. Fouling analysis and control. In Future Industrial Prospects of Membrane Processes; Cecille, L., Toussaint, J. C., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, U.K., 1988, pp 234-247.
19. Lahoussine-Turcaud, V.; Wiesner, M. R.; Bottero, J. Y. Fouling in tangential-flow ultrafiltration: effect of colloid size and coagulation pretreatment. J. Membr. Sci. 1990, 52, 173-190.
20. Nyström, M.; Kaipia, L.; Luque, S. Fouling and retention of nanofïltration membranes. J. Member, 1995, 98, 249-262.
21. Hong, S.; Elimelech, M. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 132, 159-181.
22. Yuan, W.; Zydney, A. L. Humic acid fouling during microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 157, 1-12.
23. Schäfer, A. I.; Schwicker, U.; Fischer, M. M.; Fane, A. G.; Waite, T. D. Microfiltration of colloids and natural organic matter. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 171, 151.
24. Fan, L.; Harris, J. L.; Roddick, F. A.; Booker, N. A. Influence of the characteristics of natural organic matter on the fouling of microfiltration membranes. Water Res. 2001, 35 (18), 4455.
25. AWWA membrane technology research committee, Committee report. Membrane processes in potable water treatment. AWWA, J. 1992, 84 (1). 59-67.
26. Yaroshchuk, A.; Staude, E. Charged membranes for low pressure reverse osmosis properties and applications. Desalination 1992, 115-134.
27. Petersen, R. J. Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes: Review. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 83, 81-150.
28. Braghetta, A. The influence of solution chemistry operating conditions on nanofiltration of charged and uncharged organic macromolecules, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1995.
29. Wei, W.; Zydney, A. L. Humic acid fouling during ultra-filtration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 5043-5050.
30. Cho, J. W.; Amy, G.; Pellegrino, J. Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: comparison of flux decline, NOM rejection, and foulants during filtration with three UF membranes. Desalination 2000, 127, 283-298.