Responding to inadequate supervision: A model promoting integration for post-MSW practitioners

Clinical Supervisor

Volumn 25, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 105-126

  Giddings, Martha M ^a   Cleveland, Peggy H ^a   Smith, Carol H ^a,b  

^a VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LCSW Supervision Project

Author keywords

Clinical supervision; Deficit supervision; Field education; Field practicum; Inadequate supervision; Practicum problems; Supervision; Supervision models

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247486139     PISSN: 07325223     EISSN: 1545231X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J001v25n01_08     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Abbott, A.A. & Lyter, S.C. (1998). The use of constructive criticism in field supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 17(2), 43-57.
2. Abramson, J.S. & Fortune, A.E. (1990). Improving field instruction: An evaluation of a seminar for new field instructors. Journal of Social Work Education, 26, 273-286.
3. Allen, G., Szollos, S., & Williams, B. (1986). Doctoral students' comparative evaluations of best and worst psychotherapy supervision. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 91-99.
4. Alonso, A. (1983). A developmental theory of psychodynamic supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 1(3), 23-26.
5. Alperin, D.E. (1998). Factors related to student satisfaction with child welfare field placements. Journal of Social Work Education, 34(1), 43-54.
6. American Psychiatric Association (2000). DSM-IV-TR: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (text revision). Washington, DC: Author.
7. Blake, R.R. & Mouton, S.S. (1982). How to choose a leadership style. Training and Development Journal, 36, 39-46.
8. Bogo, M. & Power, R. (1992). New field instructors' perceptions of institutional supports for their roles. Journal of Social Work Education, 28, 178-189.
9. Bogo, M. & Vayda, E. (1998). The practice of field instruction in social work: Theory and process (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
10. Bonosky, N. (1995). Boundary violations in social work supervision: Clinical educational and legal implications. The Clinical Supervisor, 13(2), 79-95.
11. Borders, L.D., Cashwell, C.S., & Rotter, J.C. (1995). Supervision of counselor licensure applicants: A comparative study. Counselor Education and Supervision, 35, 54-69.
12. Brandon, J. & Davies, M. (1979). The limits of competence in social work: The assessment of marginal students in social work education. British Journal of Social Work, 9, 295-347.
13. Burke, S.G., Condon, S., & Wickell, B. (1999). The field liaison role in schools of social work: A break with the past. The Clinical Supervisor, 18(1), 203-210.
14. Carlson, S., Delgado, M., Hagerty, L., Jarman-Rohde, L., Kolar, P., McFall, J., Navarre, J., Pace, F., Palya, J., Reeser, L., Strom, G., & Syles, D. (2000, March). The canary in the mine: Crisis in field education, danger or opportunity. Position paper of the North Central Field Education Director's Consortium, presented at the Council on Social Work Education Annual Program Meeting, New York.
15. Carroll, M. (1996). Counselling supervision: Theory, skills and practice. London: Cassell.
16. Caspi, J. & Reid, W. (1998). The task-centered model for field instruction: An innovative approach. Journal of Social Work Education, 34(1), 55-71.
17. Cimino, D., Cimino, E., Nuehring, E., Raybin, L., & Wisler-Waldock, B. (1982). Student satisfaction with field work. Contemporary Social Work Education, 5(1), 68-75.
18. Council on Social Work Education, Commission on Accreditation (2003). Handbook of accreditation of standards and procedures (5th ed.). Alexandria, VA: CSWE.
19. Csiernik, R. (2001). The practice of field work: What social work students actually do in the field. Canadian Journal of Social Work, 3(2), 9-20.
20. Curiel, H. & Rosenthal, J. (1987). Comparing structure in social work supervision by social work program level. The Clinical Supervisor, 5, 53-67.
21. Davy, J. (2002). Discursive reflections on a research agenda for clinical supervision. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 75, 221-238.
22. Deal, K.H. (2000). The usefulness of developmental stage models for clinical social work students: An exploratory study. The Clinical Supervisor, 19(1), 1-16.
23. Ellison, M. (1994). Critical field instructor behaviors: Student and field instructor views. Arete, 18(2), 12-20.
24. Erera, I.P. & Lazar, A. (1994). The administrative and educational functions in supervision: Indications of incompatibility. The Clinical Supervisor, 12(2), 39-56.
25. Fortune, A. & Abramson, J. (1993). Predictors of satisfaction with field practicum among field students. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(1), 95-110.
26. Fortune, A.E., Feathers, C., Rook, S.R., Scrimenti, R.M., Smollen, P., Stemerman, B., & Tucker, E.L. (1985). Student satisfaction with field placement. Journal of Social Work Education, 21(3), 92-104.
27. Freeman, E.M. (1985). The importance of feedback in clinical supervision: Implications for direct practice. The Clinical Supervisor, 3(1), 5-26.
28. Friedlander, M.L. & Ward, L.G., (1984). Development and validation of the Supervisory Styles Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(4), 541-557.
29. Frumkin, M.L. (1980). Social work education and the professional curriculum fallacy: A practical guide to field-school relations. Journal of Education for Social Work, 16, 91-99.
30. Garland, J.A., Jones, H.E., & Kolodny, R. (1965). A model for stages of development of social work groups. In S. Bernstein (Ed.), Explorations in group work: Essays in theory and practice (pp. 12-53). Boston, MA: Boston University School of Social Work.
31. Garvin, C.D. (1997). Contemporary group work (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
32. Giddings, M.M., Thompson, K., & Holland, T. (1997). The relationship between student assessment of agency work climate and satisfaction with practicum. Arete, 21, Winter/Spring, 25-35.
33. Giddings, M.M., Vodde, R., & Cleveland, P. (2003). Examining student-field instructor problems in practicum: Beyond student satisfaction measures. The Clinical Supervisor, 22(2), 191-214.
34. Glasser, P.M. & Garvin, C.D. (1976). An organizational model. In R.W. Roberts & H. Northern (Eds.), Theories of social work with groups (pp. 75-115). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
35. Gray, S.W., Alperin, D.E., & Wik, R. (1989). Multidimensional expectations of student supervision in social work. The Clinical Supervisor, 7(1), 89-102.
36. Haley, J. (1996). Learning and teaching therapy. New York, NY: Guilford.
37. Hamilton, G. (1954). Self-awareness in professional education. Social Casework, 35(9), 371-379.
38. Holloway, E.L. (1995). Clinical supervision: A systems approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Holman, S.L. & Freed, P. (1987). Learning social work practice: A taxonomy. The Clinical Supervisor, 5(1), 3-21.
40. Hutt, C., Scott, J., & King, M. (1983). A phenomenological study of supervisees' positive and negative experience in supervision. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 20(1), 118-123.
41. Itzhaky, H. & Eliahu, A. (1999). Do students reflect their field instructors: The relationship between supervisory and learning styles in social work field instruction. The Clinical Supervisor, 18(1), 75-84.
42. Jarman-Rohde, L., McFall, J., Kolar, P., & Strom, G. (1997). The changing context of social work practice: Implications and recommendations for social work educators. Journal of Social Work Education, 33(1), 29-46.
43. Kadushin, A. (1974). Supervisor-supervisees: A survey. Social Work, 19, 288-297.
44. Kadushin, A. (1992). Supervision in social work (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
45. Kagen, N. (1980). Influencing human interaction: Eighteen years with IPR. In A.K. Hess (Ed.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 525-530). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
46. Kissman, K. & Van Tran, T. (1990). Perceived quality of field placement education among graduate social work students. Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 5(2), 27-30.
47. Knight, C. (2000). Engaging the student in the field instruction relationship: BSW and MSW students' views. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 20(3/4), 173-201.
48. Knight, C. (2001). The skills of teaching social work practice in the generalist/foundation curriculum: BSW and MSW student views. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(3), 507-521.
49. Knowles, M. (1972). Innovations in teaching styles and approaches based upon adult learning. Journal of Education for Social Work, 8(2), 32-39.
50. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential leaning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
51. Langs, R. (1979). The supervisory experience. New York, NY: Jason Aronson.
52. Larsen, J. (1980). Competency-based and task-centered practicum based instruction. Journal of Social Work Education, 16(1), 87-95.
53. Latting, J.E. (1986). Adaptive supervision: A theoretical model for social work. Administration in Social Work, 10(1), 15-23.
54. Lazar, A. & Eisikovitz, Z. (1997). Social work students' preferences regarding supervisory styles and supervisor's behavior. The Clinical Supervisor, 16(1), 25-37.
55. Loganbill, C., Hardy, E., & Delworth, U. (1982). Supervision: A conceptual model. The Counseling Psychologist, 10(1), 3-42.
56. Maidment, J. (2003). Problems experienced by student on field placement: Using research findings to inform curriculum design and content. Australian Social Work, 56(1), 50-60.
57. Mok, B.H. (1993). Integrative seminar: A cognitive approach to linking theory and practice in social work. International Social Work, 36, 333-340.
58. Munson, C.E. (1981). Style and structure in supervision. Journal of Education for Social Work, 17(1), 65-72.
59. Munson, C.E. (1983). An introduction to clinical social work supervision (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Haworth Press, Inc.
60. Munson, C.E. (1993). Clinical social work supervision. New York, NY: The Haworth Press, Inc.
61. National Association of Social Workers (1999). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
62. Nye, C.H. (2002). Using developmental processes in supervision: A psychodynamic approach. The Clinical Supervisor, 27(2), 39-53.
63. O'Connor, B.P. (2000). Reasons for less than ideal psychotherapy supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 19(2), 173-183.
64. Page, S. & Wosket, V. (1994). Supervising the counselor: A cyclical model. London: Routledge.
65. Pearson, A. (2001). A case in clinical supervision: A framework for putting theory into practice. Journal of Mental Health and Counseling, 23(2), 174-183.
66. Pilalis, J. (1986). The integration of theory and practice: A re-examination of a paradoxical expectation. British Journal of Social Work, 16, 79-96.
67. Powell, D.J. (1993). Clinical supervision in alcohol and drug abuse counseling: Principles, models and methods. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
68. Quarto, C.J. (2002). Supervisors' and supervisees' perceptions of control and conflict in counseling supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 27(2), 21-37.
69. Regehr, C., Stalker, C.A., Jacobs, M., & Pelech, W. (2001). The gatekeeper and the wounded healer. The Clinical Supervisor, 20(1), 127-143.
70. Reising, G.N. & Daniels, M.H. (1983). A study of Hogan's model of counselor development and supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 235-244.
71. Reynolds, B.C. (1949). Learning and teaching in the practice of social work. New York, NY: Farrar and Rinehart.
72. Rita, E. (1998). Solution-focused supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 17(2), 127-139.
73. Rogers, G. & McDonald, L. (1995). Expedience over education: Teaching methods used by field instructors. The Clinical Supervisor, 13(2), 41-65.
74. Ronnestad, M.H. & Skovholt, T.M. (1993). Supervision of beginning and advanced graduate students of counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling and Development, 71(4), 396-405.
75. Rosenblatt, A. & Mayer, J. (1975). Objectionable supervisory styles: Students' views. Social Work, 20(3), 184-189.
76. Ross, J.W. (1992). Clinical supervision: Key to effective social work [Editorial]. Health & Social Work, 17(2), 83-85.
77. Ross, J.W. (1993). Redefining hospital social work: An embattled professional domain [Editorial]. Health & Social. Work, 18(4), 243-247.
78. Ross, J.W. (1994). Health social work: Narrowing the gulf between practice and academia. [Editorial], Health & Social Work, 19(3), 154.
79. Rothstein, J. (2001). Clinical supervision-then and now: The professional development of social workers. Reflections: Narratives of Professional Helping, 7(1), 61-71.
80. Saari, C. (1989). The process of learning in clinical social work. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 60(1), 35-49.
81. Schiller, L. (1997). Rethinking stages of development in women's groups: Implications for practice. Social Work with Groups, 20(3), 3-19.
82. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
83. Skovolt, T.J. & Ronnestad, M.H. (1992). Themes in therapist and counselor development. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70, 505-515.
84. Stoltenberg, C. (1981). Approaching supervision from developmental perspective: The counselor complexity model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 59-65.
85. Stoltenberg, C. & Delworth, U. (1987). Supervision counselors and therapists: A developmental approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
86. Stoltenberg, C.D., McNeill, B., & Delworth, U. (1998). IDM supervision: An integrated developmental model for supervising counselors and supervisors. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
87. Tracey, T.J. (2002). Stages of counseling and therapy: An examination of complementarity and the working alliance. In G.S. Tryon (Ed.), Counseling based on process research: Applying what we know (pp. 265-597). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
88. Truax, C.B. & Carkhuff, R.R. (1967). Toward effective counseling and psychotherapy: Training and practice: Chicago, IL: Aldine.
89. Valentine, D. (1994). Field Education: Exploring the future, expanding the vision [Editorial] [Special section: Field Education in Social Work]. Journal of Social Work Education, 40(1), 3-11.
90. Worthington, E.L. (1987). Changes in supervision as counselors and supervisors gain experience: A review. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 189-209.