Preventive Misconception. Its Nature, Presence, and Ethical Implications for Research

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 370-374

  Simon, Alan E ^a   Wu, Albert W ^b   Lavori, Philip W ^c,d   Sugarman, Jeremy ^b  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Palo Alto Coordinating Center   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLACEBO;

ARTICLE; CONCEPT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTERVENTION STUDY; PREVENTION STUDY; PROBABILITY;

HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 34247485894     PISSN: 07493797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bartholow B.N., Buchbinder S., Celum C., et al. HIV sexual risk behavior over 36 months of follow-up in the world's first HIV vaccine efficacy trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 39 (2005) 90-101
2. Oxman M.N., Levin M.J., Johnson G.R., et al. A vaccine to prevent herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults. N Engl J Med 352 (2005) 2271-2284
3. Lowndes C.M., and Gill O.N. Cervical cancer, human papillomavirus, and vaccination. BMJ 331 (2005) 915-916
4. Appelbaum P.S., Lidz C.W., and Grisso T. Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: frequency and risk factors. IRB 26 (2004) 1-8
5. Lidz C.W., Appelbaum P.S., Grisso T., and Renaud M. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risk in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med 58 (2004) 1689-1697
6. Chesney M.A., Chambers D.B., and Kahn J.O. Risk behavior for HIV infection in participants in preventive HIV vaccine trials: a cautionary note. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 16 (1997) 266-271
7. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. DHEW Publication No 78-00 (OS) (1978), Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Publication, Washington DC
8. Sugarman J., Lavori P.W., Boeger M., et al. Evaluating the quality of informed consent. Clin Trials 2 (2005) 34-41
9. Johnson R.L., Penny J., Gordon B., Shumate S.R., and Fisher S. Resolving score differences in the rating of writing samples: does discussion improve the accuracy of scores?. Language Assess Q 2 (2005) 117-146
10. Agresti A., and Coull B. Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat 52 (1998) 119-126
11. StataCorp. Stata base reference manual: release 8 Vol. 2 (2003), Stata Press, College Station TX
12. Landis J.R., and Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1977) 159-174
13. Reichenheim M.E. Confidence intervals for the kappa statistic. Stata J 4 (2004) 421-428
14. Fleiss J.L. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. (1981), Wiley, New York
15. Johnson M.O. Belief of vaccine receipt in HIV vaccine trials: further cautions. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 21 (1999) 413-416
16. Sheon A. Social, ethical, and behavioral issues in vaccine trial participation (1996), International Conference on AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia