Evolution of colorful display

Evolution

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 708-712

  Borgia, Gerald ^a   Coyle, Brian ^a   Zwiers, P B ^a  

^a Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

Character displacement; Character state reconstruction; Mate recognition; Rapid evolution; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; MATE RECOGNITION; PASSERINE; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; COLOR; EVOLUTION; FEATHER; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SEXUAL SELECTION; SONGBIRD; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; COLOR; EVOLUTION; FEATHERS; FEMALE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; PASSERIFORMES; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

PTILONORHYNCHIDAE;

EID: 34247482860     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00051.x     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Alatalo, R. V., L. Gustafsson, and A. Lundberg. 1994. Male coloration and species recognition in sympatric flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 256:113-118.
2. Borgia, G. 1985. Bower quality, number of decorations and mating success of male satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceous): an experimental analysis. Anim. Behav. 33:266-271.
3. -. 1993. The cost of display in the non-resource based mating system of the satin bowerbird. Am. Nat. 141:729-743.
4. -. 1995. Why do bowerbirds build bowers? Am. Sci. 83:542-547.
5. Borgia, G. and M. Gore. 1986. Sexual competition by feather stealing in the satin bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus). Anim. Behav. 34:727-738.
6. Borgia, G., I. Katz, and R. Condit. 1987. Flower choice and the decoration of the bower of the satin bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus). Anim. Behav. 35:1129-1139.
7. Borgia, G. 1997. Comparative behavioral and biochemical studies of bowerbirds and the evolution of bower-building. Pp. 263-276 in M. L. Reaka-Kudla, D. E. Wilson, and E. O. Wilson, eds. Biodiversity. Vol. II. Understanding and protecting our biological resource. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC.
8. Borgia, G., and S. W. Coleman. 2000. Co-option of male courtship signals from aggressive display in bowerbirds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:1735-1740.
9. Borgia, G., and J. Keagy. 2006. An inverse relationship between decoration and food colour preferences in satin bowerbirds does not support the sensory drive hypothesis. Anim. Behav. 72:1125-1133.
10. Coleman, S.W., G. L. Patricelli, and G. Borgia. 2004. Variable female preferences drive complex male displays. Nature 428:742-745.
11. Cooper,W. T. and J. M. Forshaw. 1977. The birds of paradise and bowerbirds. William, Collins, Sydney.
12. Cunningham, C.W., K. E. Omland, T. H. Oakley. 1998. Reconstructing ancestral character states: a critical reappraisal. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:361-366.
13. Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
14. Endler, J. A., and M. Théry. 1996. Interacting effects of lek placement, display behavior, ambient light and color patterns in three neotropical forest-dwelling birds. Am. Nat. 148:421-452.
15. Endler, J. A., D. A. Westcott, J. R. Madden, and T. Robson. 2005. Processing illuminates signal evolution animal visual systems and the evolution of color patterns: sensory processing illuminates signal evolution. Evolution. 59(8):1795-1818.
16. Frith, C. B., and D.W. Frith. 2004. The bowerbirds. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
17. Gilliard, E. T. 1969. Birds of paradise and bowerbirds. Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London.
18. Hunter, C. P. and P. D. Dwyer. 1997. The value of objects to satin bowerbirds Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. Emu 97:200-206.
19. Kusmierski, R., G. Borgia, J. A. C. Uy, and R. Crozier. 1997. Molecular information on bowerbird phylogeny and the evolution of exaggerated male characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264:307-313.
20. Losos, J. 1999. Uncertainty in the reconstruction of ancestral character states and limitations on the use of phylogenetic comparative methods. Anim. Behav. 58:1319-1324.
21. Maddison, W. P. and D. R. Maddison. 2005. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Ver. 1.06. Available at http://mesquiteproject.org
22. Madden, J. R. 2002. Bower decorations attract females but provoke other male spotted bowerbirds: bower owners resolve this tradeoff. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:1347-1351.
23. Omland, K. E., and S. M. Lanyon. 2000. Restructuring plumage evolution in orioles (Icterus): repeated convergence and reversals in patterns. Evolution 54(6):2119-2133.
24. Patricelli, G. L., J. A. C. Uy, and G. Borgia. 2004. Female signals enhance the efficiency of mate assessment in satin bower-birds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus). Behav. Ecol. 15:297-304.
25. Posada, D. and K. A. Crandall. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
26. Prum, R. O. 1997. Phylogenetic tests of alternative intersexual selection mechanisms: macroevolution of male traits in a polygynous clade (Aves: Pipridae). Am. Nat. 149:668-692.
27. Ronquist, F. and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
28. Ryan, M. J., W. Rand, P. L. Hurd, S. M. Phelps, and A. S. Rand. 2003. Generalization in response to mate recognition signals. Am. Nat. 161:380-394.
29. Schluter, D., T. Price, A. Ø. Mooers and D. Ludwig. 1998. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51:1699-1711.
30. Sturmbauer, C., J. S. Levinton, and J. Christy. 1996. Molecular phylogeny analysis of fiddler crabs: test of the hypothesis of increasing behavioral complexity in evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93(20):10855-10857.
31. Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Ver. 4.0b10 (Altivec). Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
32. Uy, J. A. C. and G. Borgia. 2000. Sexual selection drives rapid divergence in bowerbird display traits. Evolution 54:273-278.
33. Wiens, J. 2001. Widespread loss of sexually selected traits: how the peacock lost its spots. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:517-521.