Training of peer reviewers: Validation of a 5-point rating scale [8]

PLoS Medicine

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 774-

  Callaham, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LETTER; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; TRAINING; VALIDATION PROCESS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; STANDARD; TEACHING; VALIDATION STUDY;

HUMANS; PEER REVIEW; RESEARCH DESIGN; TEACHING;

EID: 34247475229     PISSN: 15491277     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040166     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Callaham ML, Tercier J (2007) The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality. PLoS Med 4: e40. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040040
2. Landkroon AP, Euser AM, Veeken H, Hart W, Overbeke AJ (2006) Quality assessment of reviewers' reports using a simple instrument. Obstet Gynecol 108: 979-985.