Distributed resources and re-regulated electricity markets

Electric Power Systems Research

Volumn 77, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1148-1159

  Ackermann, Thomas ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Deregulation; Distributed generation; Distributed resources; Electricity market; Market power, liberalisation; Re regulation

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEREGULATION; ELECTRICITY; MARKETING;

DISTRIBUTED RESOURCES; ELECTRICITY MARKET; LIBERALIZATION; MARKET POWER; REREGULATION;

DISTRIBUTED POWER GENERATION;

EID: 34247468879     PISSN: 03787796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2006.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ackermann T., Andersson G., and Söder L. Distributed generation: a definition. Electric Power Syst. Res. 57 (2001) 195-204
2. D. Moskovitz, Profits and Progress Through Distributed Resources, published by the Regulatory Assistance Project, Maine, USA, also available at: http://www.rapmaine.org/distribution.html.
3. Schweppe F.C., Caramanis M.C., Tabors R.D., and Bohn R.E. Spot Pricing of Electricity (1987), Kluwer, Boston, USA
4. CIRED Working Group No 4 on Dispersed Generation, Report, Nice, June 1999.
5. CIRED Working Group No 4 on Dispersed Generation, Report, Nice, June 1999. CIGRE data based on Report of CIGRE WG 37-23 on Impact of increasing contribution of dispersed generation on the power system.
6. CIRED Working Group No 4 on Dispersed Generation, Report, Nice, June 1999. EnergieNed data based on EnergieNed report from 1997.
7. WADE Survey of Decentralised Energy-2002. by World Alliance for Decentralized Energy (WADE), Edinburgh, UK, 2002. available at: http://www.localpower.org/.
8. IEA, Distributed Generation in Liberalised Electricity Markets, Paris, France 2002.
9. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), Study of Status and Penetration Levels of Distributed Generation (DG) in Europe and the US (Stage One), London, UK, 2003. available at: http://www.distributed-generation.org.uk/.
10. Arnt Tor Johnsen, Increased Concentration in the Norwegian Electricity Market: Is the Market Sufficiently Open, or Can a Dominant Norwegian Power Company Raise Prices? Newletter International Association for Energy Economics, First Quarter 2003. pp. 18-23.
11. Council of Australian Governments, Towards a Truly National and Efficient Energy Market, Australia, December 2002. Available at http://www.energymarketreview.org/.
12. F.A. Wolak, Lessons from the California Electricity Crises, Center for the Study of Energy Markets (CSEM) working paper: CSEM WP-110, University of California Energy Institute, Berkeley, USA, April 2003. Also available at http://www.ucei.org.
13. J. Bushnell, Looking for Trouble: Competition Policy in the U.S. Electricity Industry, Center for the Study of Energy Markets (CSEM) working paper: CSEM WP-109. University of California Energy Institute, Berkeley, USA, April 2003. Also available at http://www.ucei.org.
14. FERC, Final Report on Price Manipulation in Western Markets-Fact-Finding Investigation of Potential Manipulation of Electric and Natural Gas Prices, DOCKET No. PA02-2-000, Washington, USA, March 2003. Available at: http://www3.ferc.gov/PART-I-3-26-03.pdf and http://www3.ferc.gov/part-2-3-26-03.pdf.
15. J.L. Sweeney, The California Electricity Crises, Hoover Institution Press, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, 2002.
16. California Independent System Operator (Cal-ISO), Analysis of Trading and Scheduling Strategies Decribed in Enron Memos, Folsom, USA, October 2002. Available at http://oasis.caiso.com/docs/2003/01/06/2003010617125814460.pdf.
17. C. Blumstein, L.S. Friedman, R.J. Green, The History of Electricity Restructuring in California, University of California Energy Institute, Center for the Study of Energy Markets (CSEM) Working Paper: CSEM WP 103, Berkeley, California, USA, August 2002. Available at: http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei/PDF/csemwp103.pdf.
18. J.V. Hansen, J. Hauch, M.T. Kromann, Will the Nordic Power Market Remain Competitive? Working Paper Danish Economic Council, 2001:7, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2001. Available at: http://www.dors.dk.
19. M.T. Kromann, Imperfect Competition in the Nordic Electrcity Markets, Working Paper Danish Economic Council, 2001:3, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2001. Available at: http://www.dors.dk.
20. Swedish Energy Agency, The Electricity Market 2002. Eskilstuna, Sweden, September 2002. Available at http://www6.stem.se/.
21. J & W Energi och Miljö, Underlag för prövning av stängningen av den andra kärnkraftsreaktorn vid Barsebäck, Regeringskansliet, Näringsdepartemented, Stockholm, Sweden, October, 2002.
22. A.B. Lovins, E.K. Datta, T. Feiler, K.R. Rabago, J.N. Swisher, A. Lehman, K. Wicker, Small is Profitable-The Hidden Economic Benefits of Making Electrical Resources the Right Size, Rocky Mountain Institute, Snowmass, USA, 2002.
23. Neenan Associates, NYISO PRL Program Evaluation, January 2002.
24. R. Lafferty, D. Hunger, J. Ballard, G. Mahrenholz, D. Mead, D. Bandera, Demand Responsiveness in Electricity Markets, Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates, January 2001. Available at http://www.eere.energy.gov/electricityverb_restructuring/pdfs/fercverb_doc.pdf.
25. Charles River Associates, Electricity Demand Side Management Study, September, 2001.
26. Office of Gas an Electricity Markets (OFGEM), Report to the DTI on the Review of the Initial Impact of NETA on Smaller Generators, UK, August 2001. Available at http://www.ofgem.gov.uk.
27. P.E. Morthorst, Wind Power and the Conditions at a Liberalized Power Market, in press.
28. T. Ackermann, Distributed Resources in a Re-Regulated Market Environment, PhD Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Electrical Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden, May 2004.
29. Eriksen P.B., and Hilger C. Wind power in the Danish power system. In: Ackermann T. (Ed). Wind Power in Power Systems (2005), Wiley & Sons