A method to calculate coverage probability from uncertainties in radiotherapy via a statistical shape model

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 52, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1947-1965

  Price, G J ^a   Moore, C J ^a  

^a CHRISTIE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; STATISTICAL METHODS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

COVERAGE PROBABILITY; POINT DISTRIBUTION MODEL (PDM); RIGID BODY MOTION; STATISTICAL SHAPE MODELS;

RADIOTHERAPY;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GEOMETRY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

DIFFUSION; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROBABILITY; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIATION ONCOLOGY; RADIOTHERAPY, CONFORMAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34247467600     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/7/012     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Anderson E et al 1999 LAPACK Users' Guide (Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics)
2. Angenent S, Haker S, Tannenbaum A and Kikinis R 1999 On the Laplace-Beltrami operator and brain surface flattening IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18 700-11
3. Baum C, Alber M, Birkner M and Nüsslin F 2006 Robust treatment planning for intensity modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer based on coverage probabilities Radiat. Oncol. 78 27-35
4. Bel A, Keus R, Vijlbrief R E and Lebesque J V 1995 Setup deviations in wedged pair irradiation of parotid gland and tonsillar tumors, measured with an electronic portal imaging device Radiother. Oncol. 37 153-9
5. Brechbühler C, Gerig G and Kübler O 1995 Parameterisation of closed surfaces for 3-D shape description Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 61 154-70
6. Caunce A and Taylor C J 1998 3D point distribution models of the cortical sulci Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Computer Vision pp 402-7
7. Cootes T F, Cooper D H, Taylor C J and Graham J 1992 Trainable method of parametric shape description Image Vis. Comput. 10 289-94
8. Cootes T F and Taylor C J 1999 A mixture model for representing shape variation Image Vis. Comput. 17 567-73
9. Cootes T F, Taylor C J, Cooper D H and Graham J 1995 Active shape models-their training and application Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 61 38-59
10. Craig T, Battista J, Moiseenko V and Van Dyk J 2001 Considerations for the implementation of target volume protocols in radiation therapy Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 49 241-50
11. Deurloo K E, Steenbakkers R J, Zijp L J, de Bois J A, Nowak P J, Rasch C R and van Herk M 2005 Quantification of shape variation of prostate and seminal vesicles during external beam radiotherapy Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 61 228-38
12. European Commission 1997 Criteria for acceptability of radiological (including radiotherapy) and nuclear medicine installations Radiation Protection 91
13. Fiorino C, Reni M, Bolognesi A, Cattaneo G M and Calandrino R 1998 Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning Radiat. Oncol. 47 285-92
14. Fletcher P T, Lu C, Pizer M and Joshi S 2004 Principal geodesic analysis for the study of nonlinear statistics of shape IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23 995-1005
15. Floater M S and Hormann K 2005 Surface parameterization: a tutorial and survey Proc. Advances in Multiresolution for Geometric Modelling (Berlin, Heidelberg) pp 157-86
16. Fontenla E, Pelizzari C A, Roeske J C and Chen G T Y 2001a Numerical analysis of a model of organ motion using serial imaging measurements from prostate radiotherapy Phys. Med. Biol. 46 2337-58
17. Fontenla E, Pelizzari C A, Roeske J C and Chen G T Y 2001b Using serial imaging data to model variabilities in organ position and shape during radiotherapy Phys. Med. Biol. 46 2317-36
18. Gotsman C, Gu X F and Sheffer A 2003 Fundamentals of spherical parameterization for 3D meshes ACM Trans. Graph. 22 358-63
19. Haker S, Warfield S K and Tempany C M C 2004 Landmark-guided surface matching and volumetric warping for improved prostate biopsy targeting and guidance Proc. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2004 pp 853-61
20. Hamilton C S and Ebert M A 2005 Volumetric uncertainty in radiotherapy Clin. Oncol. 17 456-64
21. Hoogeman M S, van Herk M, de Bois J, Muller-Timmermans P, Koper P C and Lebesque J V 2004 Quantification of local rectal wall displacements by virtual rectum unfolding Radiat. Oncol. 70 21-30
22. Hoogeman M S, van Herk M, Yan D, Boersma L J, Koper P C M and Lebesque J V 2002 A model to simulate day-to-day variations in rectum shape Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 54 615-25
23. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements 1993 Prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy ICRU Report 50
24. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements 1999 Prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy (supplement to ICRU Report 50) ICRU Report 62
25. Jaffray D A, Siewerdsen J H, Wong J W and Martinez A A 2002 Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 53 1337-49
26. Kaus M R, Pekar V, Lorenz C, Truyen R, Lobregt S and Weese J 2003 Automated 3-D PDM construction from segmented images using deformable models IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22 1005-13
27. Kelemen A, Székely G and Gerig G 1999 Elastic model-based segmentation of 3-D neuroradiological data sets IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18 828-39
28. Liang J and Yan D 2003 Reducing uncertainties in volumetric image based deformable organ registration Med. Phys. 30 2116-22
29. Lorenz C and Krahnstöver N 2000 Generation of point-based 3D statistical shape models for anatomical objects Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 77 175-91
30. Mageras G S, Fuks Z, Leibel S A, Ling C C, Zelefsky M J, Kooy H M, van Herk M and Kutcher G J 1999 Computerized design of target margins for treatment uncertainties in conformal radiotherapy Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 43 437-45
31. Mageras G S, Kutcher G J, Leibel S A, Zelefsky M J, Melian E, Mohan R and Fuks Z 1996 A method of incorporating organ motion uncertainties into three-dimensional conformal treatment plans Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 35 333-42
32. McBain C A, Henry A M, Sykes J, Amer A, Marchant T, Moore C M, Davies J, Stratford J, McCarthy C and Porritt B 2006 X-ray volumetric imaging in image-guided radiotherapy: the new standard in on-treatment imaging Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 64 625-34
33. McCarthy C, Davies J, Stratford J, Duffy M and Hodge L 2006 Image guided radiotherapy (IGRT): the impact of new technology on clinical decision making Radiat. Mag. 32 31-2
34. McKenzie A, Coffey M, Greener T, Hall C, Van Kerk M, Mijnheer B and Harrison A 2003 Technical Overview of Geometric Uncertainties in Radiotherapy (London: British Institute of Radiology) pp 11-27
35. Meijer G J, Rasch C, Remeijer P and Lebesque J V 2003 Three-dimensional analysis of delineation errors, setup errors, and organ motion during radiotherapy of bladder cancer Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 55 1277-87
36. Muren L P, Ekerold R, Kvinnsland Y, Karlsdottir A and Dahl O 2004 On the use of margins for geometrical uncertainties around the rectum in radiotherapy planning Radiat. Oncol. 70 11
37. Praun E and Hoppe H 2003 Spherical parameterization and Remeshing ACM Trans. Graph. 22 340-9
38. Price G J and Moore C J 2006 Quantitative comparison of delineated structure shape in radiotherapy Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 2006 (San Diego, CA) pp 61444W1-61444W10
39. Quicken M, Brechbühler C, Hug J, Blattman H and Székely G 2000 Parameterization of closed surfaces for parametric surface description Proc. Computer Vision Pattern Recognition pp I-354-I-360
40. Remeijer P, Rasch C, Lebesque J V and van Herk M 1999 A general methodology for three-dimensional analysis of variation in target volume delineation Med. Phys. 26 931-40
41. Royston J P 1982 An extension of Shapiro and Wilk-W test for normality to large samples Appl. Stat. 31 115-24
42. Shapiro S S and Wilk M B 1965 An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples) Biometrika 52 591-611
43. Söhn M, Birkner M, Yan D and Alber M 2005 Modelling individual geometric variation based on dominant eigenmodes of organ deformation: implementation and evaluation Phys. Med. Biol. 50 5893-908
44. Sozou P D, Cootes T F, Taylor C J and Di Mauro E C 1995 Non-linear generalization of point distribution models using polynomial regression Image Vis. Comput. 13 451
45. Staib L H and Duncan J S 1996 Model-Based deformable surface finding for medical images IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 15 720-31
46. Stroom J C, de Boer H C J, Huizenga H and Visser A G 1999 Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 43 905-19
47. Stroom J C and Heijmen B J M 2002 Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins, and the ICRU-62 report Radiat. Oncol. 64 75-83
48. Sykes J R, Amer A, Czajka J and Moore C J 2005 A feasibility study for image guided radiotherapy using low dose, high speed, cone beam X-ray volumetric imaging Radiat. Oncol. 77 45-52
49. van Herk M 2004 Errors and margins in radiotherapy Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 14 52
50. Xiong L, Viswanathan A, Stewart A J, Haker S, Tempany C M, Chin L M and Cormack R A 2006 Deformable structure registration of bladder through surface mapping Med. Phys. 33 1848-56
51. Yan D, Jaffray D A and Wong J W 1999 A model to accumulate fractionated dose in a deforming organ Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 44 665-75
52. Yan D, Xu B, Lockman D, Kota K, Brabbins D S, Wong J and Martinez A A 2001 The influence of interpatient and intrapatient rectum variation on external beam treatment of prostate cancer Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 51 1111-9