Tradable building rights and the financing of urban renewal

Town Planning Review

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 103-117

  de Kam, George ^a   Lubach, Dick A ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDING; CAPITAL; FINANCE; HOUSING MARKET; NEIGHBORHOOD; PROFITABILITY; PROPERTY RIGHTS; STATE ROLE; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN HOUSING; URBAN POLICY; URBAN RENEWAL;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 34247465081     PISSN: 00410020     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3828/tpr.78.1.7     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. DE KAM, G. (2005), Social Enterprise in the Dutch Property Market (GaP Working Paper No. 3), Nijmegen, Radboud University Nijmegen.
2. DE KAM, G. and LUBACH, D. (2001), 'Notitie verhandelbaar bouwrecht' (unpublished report on tradable building rights to Aedes vereniging van woningcorporaties), Hilversum, Aedes.
3. DE KAM, G. and NEEDHAM, B. (2001), Met beide benen: een onderzoek naar de strategie van woningcorporaties op de grondmarkt (Two Feet on The Ground: An Inquiry into The Strategy of Housing Associations in The Land Market (report to Aedes vereniging van woningcorporaties), Hilversum, Aedes.
4. DONGERADEEL (LOCAL AUTHORITY OF DONGERADEEL) (2002), De waarde van een contingent (The Value of Quota [confidential report]), Dongeradeel, Local Authority of Dongeradeel.
5. HEMERIJCK, A. (1998), Vier beleidsvragen. Naar een grotere coherentie in de beleidswetenschap (Four Policy Questions: Towards more Coherence in the Policy Science [internal publication]), Rotterdam, Erasmus University.
6. JOHNSTON, R. and MADISON, M. (1997), 'From landmarks to landscapes: a review of current practices in the transfer of development rights', Journal of the American Planning Association, 63, 365-79.
7. MACHEMER, P. and KAPLOWITZ, M. (2002), 'A framework for evaluating transferable development rights programmes', Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 45, 773-95.
8. PRIEMUS, H. (2004), 'Housing and new urban renewal: current policies in The Netherlands', European Journal of Housing Policy, 4, 229-46.
9. RINGELING, A. (2002), 'An instrument is not a tool' (paper presented at the conference on Instrument Choice in Global Democracies, Montreal, 26-28 September).
10. VROM (NETHERLANDS MINISTRY OF HOUSING, SPATIAL PLANNING AND THE ENVIRONMENT) (2001), Grounds for New Policy: Land Policy Memorandum (Summary), The Hague, VROM.
11. VROM (NETHERLANDS MINISTRY OF HOUSING, SPATIAL PLANNING AND THE ENVIRONMENT) (2003), Voorstel van wet nr 28 916 'Nieuwe regels omtrent de ruimtelijke ordening (Wet ruimtelijke ordening) (Draft Revision of the Spatial Planning Act), The Hague, VROM.
12. VROM (NETHERLANDS MINISTRY OF HOUSING, SPATIAL PLANNING AND THE ENVIRONMENT) (2005), Voorstel van wet houdende wijziging van de Wet ruimtelijke ordening inzake de grondexploitatie (Draft revision of the Spatial Planning Act Related to Land Managanent), The Hague, VROM.
13. WEBSTER, C. and LAI, L. (2003), Property Rights, Planning and Markets; Managing Spontaneous Cities, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.