Empowering Women through ICT Education: Facilitating Computer Adoption

Gender Technology And Development

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 359-377

  Umrani, Farida ^a   Ghadially, Rehana ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247455934     PISSN: 09718524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/097185240300700303     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
2. Alloo, Fatima. (1999) ‘Information Technology and Cyber Culture: The Case of Zanzibar,’ in Harcourt, Wendy (ed.), Women@Internet, Zed Books, London, pp. 156-61.
3. Brown, Susan and Massey, Anne. (2001) ‘Expecting More and Getting Less: An Examination of Expectation (dis)Confirmation and Information System Satisfaction,’ http://www.kelley.indiana.edu/ardennis/wp/tr135-1.doc
4. Compeau, D. and Higgins, C. (1995) ‘Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills,’ Information Systems Research 6 (2): 118-43.
5. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R. (1989) ‘User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,’ Management Science 35 (8): 982-1003.
6. Ekdahl, Peter and Trojer, Lena. (2002) ‘Digital Divide: Catch Up for What?’ Gender. Technology and Development 6 (1): 1-20.
7. Farwell, E., Wood, P., James, M., and Banks, K. (1999) ‘Global Networking for Change: Experiences from APC Women's Programme,’ in Harcourt, Wendy (ed.), Women@ Internet, Zed Books, London, pp. 53-77.
8. Franz, C.R. and Robey, D. (1986) ‘Organizational Context, User Involvement, and the Usefulness of Information Systems,’ Decision Sciences 17 (4): 329-56.
9. Hill, T., Smith, N.D., and Mann, M.F. (1987) ‘Role of Efficacy Expectations in Predicting the Decision to Use Advanced Technologies: The Case of Computers,’ Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (2): 307-13.
10. Huyer, Sophia. (1997) ‘Supporting Women's Use of Information Technologies for Sustainable Development,’ Submitted to the Gender and Sustainable Development Unit, IDRC. http://www.winsat.org/it/womenicts.html
11. Huyer, Sophia and Carr, Marilyn. (2002) ‘Information and Communication Technologies: A Priority for Women,’ Gender, Technology and Development, 6 (1): 85-100.
12. Kelkar, Govind, Shrestha, Girija, and Veena N. (2002) ‘IT Industry and Women's Agency: Explorations in Bangalore and Delhi, India,’ Gender, Technology and Development 6 (1): 63-84.
13. Kulkarni, V.P. (2003) Manorama Year Book, Malayala Manorama Press, Kottayam, India.
14. Matlin, M.W. (1995) Psychology, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, New York.
15. Mitter, Swasti. (1999) ‘Globalization, Technological Changes and the Search for a New Paradigm for Women's Work,’ Gender, Technology and Development 3 (1): 1-16.
16. Narayanan, K.N. (2002) ‘Socio-Economic Impact of Subsidized Computer Education, ‘ Submitted to Sterlite Foundation, India.
17. Swanson, E.B. (1982) ‘Measuring User Attitudes in Management Information Systems Research: A Review,’ The International Journal of Management Science, 10 (2): 157-65.
18. Szajna, B. (1996) ‘Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model,’ Management Sciences 42 (1): 85-92.
19. Thatcher, Jason, McKnight, Harrison, and Ahuja, Manju. (2002) ‘The Work Environment and Technology Acceptance: The Influence of Affective Commitment, Autonomy and Trust. ‘ htlp://www.kelley.indiana.edu/ardennis/wp/tr132-1.doc.
20. Venkatesh, Viswanath and Davis, F. (1996) ‘A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test,’ Decision Sciences 27 (3): 451-80.
21. Venkatesh, Viswanath (2000) ‘A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,’ Management Science 46 (2): 186-204.
22. Venkatesh, Viswanath, Speier, C., and Morris, M. (2002) ‘User Acceptance Enablers in Individual Decision Making about Technology: Toward an Integrated Model,’ Decision Sciences 33 (2): 297-316.