Decentring Social Sciences in Practice Through Individual Acts and Choices

Current Sociology

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 7-26

  Sinha, Vineeta ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247454552     PISSN: 00113921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0011392103051001778     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ABBI, B. L. and SABERWAL, Satish, eds (1969) Urgent Research in Social Anthropology. Simla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
2. AHMAD, Imtiaz (1972) ‘For a Sociology of India’, Contributions to Indian Sociology (n.s.) 6: 172-178.
3. ALATAS, Syed Farid (1993) ‘On the Indigenization of Academic Discourse’, Alternatives 18(3): 307-338.
4. ALATAS, Syed Farid, ed. (1998) Reflections on Alternative Discourses from Southeast Asia, Proceedings of the International Sociological Association Conference on Southeast Asia, 30 May-1 June. Singapore: Pagesetters Services.
5. ALATAS, Syed Farid and SINHA, Vineeta (2001) ‘Teaching Classical Sociological Theory in Singapore: The Context of Eurocentrism’, Teaching Sociology 29(3): 316-331.
6. ALATAS, Syed Hussein (1974) ‘The Captive Mind and Creative Development’, International Social Science Journal 34(1): 9-25.
7. ALATAS, Syed Hussein (1977) ‘Problems of Defining Religion’, International Social Science Journal 29(2): 213-234.
8. ASAD, Talal, ed. (1973) Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. New York: Humanities Press.
9. ASAD, Talal (1993) Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. BERGER, BENNETT M. (1997) ‘Review Essay of Open the Social Sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences’, Society January/February: 74-77.
11. BERREMAN, Gerald (1968) ‘Is Anthropology Alive? Social Responsibility in Anthropology’, Current Anthropology 9: 391-398.
12. CAMPBELL, Donald T. (1967) ‘Ethnocentrism of Disciplines and the Fisch-Scale Model of Omniscience’, in Muzafer Sherif and Carolyn W. Sherif (eds) Interdisciplinary Relationships in the Social Sciences, pp. 328-349. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
13. CHEE, Stephen (1974) ‘Social Sciences in Malaysia’, in Symposium on Social Science Research Development in Asia. Paris: UNESCO.
14. CHENG, L. and SO, A. (1983) ‘The Re-Establishment of Sociology in the PRC: Toward the Sinification of Marxian Sociology’, Annual Review of Sociology 9: 471-498.
15. Christiansen-Ruffman, LINDA, ed. (1998) The Global Feminist Enlightenment: Women and Social Knowledge. Madrid: International Sociological Association.
16. FANON, Frantz (1967) The Wretched of the Earth, trans. Constance Farrington. Harmondsworth: Penguin. (Orig. pub. 1961.)
17. GALTUNG, Johan (1967) ‘Scientific Colonialism’, Transition 30.
18. GOUGH, Kathleen (1968) ‘Anthropology: Child of Imperialism’, Monthly Review XIX(11): 12-27.
19. HAILEY, Lord (1944) ‘The Role of Anthropology in Colonial Development’, Man 44(5).
20. HOOKER, J. R. (1963) ‘The Anthropologist's Last Frontier: The Last Phase of African Exploitation’, Journal of Modern African Studies 1: 455-459.
21. KIM Kyong Dong (1978) ‘Future of Social Science in Korea’, Korea Journal May: 22-32.
22. LANDER, Edgardo (1997) ‘Eurocentrism and Colonialism in the Latin American Social Thought’, in Roberto Briceno-Leon and Heinz R. Sonntag (eds) Sociology in Latin America, Proceedings of the ISA Regional Conference for Latin America, pp. 65-76. Madrid: ISA.
23. MARRIOT, Mckim (1989) ‘Constructing an Indian Ethnosociology’, Contributions to Indian Sociology 23(1): 1-38.
24. NORHOLDT, N. S. and VISSER, Leontine, eds (1995) Social Science in Southeast Asia: From Particularism to Universalism. Amsterdam: VU University Press.
25. OOMMEN, T. K. (1995) Alien Concepts and South Asian Realities: Response and Reformulations. New Delhi: Sage.
26. PERTIERRA, Raul (1995) Philippine Localities and Global Perspectives. Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
27. ROOSE, Kenneth D. (1967) ‘Observations on Inter-Disciplinary Work in the Social Sciences’, pp. 323-327 in Muzafer Sherif and Carolyn W. Sherif (eds) Interdisciplinary Relationships in the Social Sciences. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
28. SHERIF, Muzafer and SHERIF, Carolyn W., eds (1967) Interdisciplinary Relationships in the Social Sciences. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
29. SINHA, Surajit (1968) ‘Is There an Indian Tradition in Social Anthropology: Retrospect and Prospect’, Journal of Indian Anthropological Society 6: 1-14.
30. SINHA, Surajit (1976) ‘The “Native” Hits Back’, Man in India 55(1): 79-81.
31. SINHA, Vineeta (1997) ‘Reconceptualising the Social Sciences in Non-Western Settings: Challenges and Dilemmas’, Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science 25(1): 167-181.
32. SINHA, Vineeta (2000) ‘Moving Beyond Critique: Towards Alternative Practice’, Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science 28(1): 67-104.
33. SPICKARD, James V. (1998) ‘Ethnocentrism, Social Theory and Non-Western Sociologies of Religion’, International Sociology 13(2): 173-194.
34. SUVANAJATA, T. and NAMATRA, A. (1974) ‘Social Sciences in Thailand’, in Symposium on Social Science Research Development in Asia. Paris: UNESCO.
35. TAMBIAH, Stanley (1984) Magic, Science, Religion and Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. UBEROI, J. S. (1968) ‘Science and Swaraj’, Contributions to Indian Sociology 2: 119-124.
37. UNESCO (1974) Symposium on Social Science Research Development in Asia. Paris: UNESCO.
38. UNESCO (1982) Regional Co-Operative Programme in Social Sciences for Development, Report of a Programme Development Meeting, New Delhi. Bangkok: UNESCO Regional Office for Education in Asia and the Pacific.
39. UNESCO (1984) Social Sciences in Asia and the Pacific. Paris: UNESCO.
40. WALLERSTEIN, Immanuel (1991) Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of Nineteenth-Century Paradigms. Cambridge: Polity Press.
41. WALLERSTEIN, Immanuel et al. (1996) Open the Social Sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences. New Delhi: Vistaar Publications.