Unpacking Complexity Through Critical Stakeholder Analysis The Case of Globalization

Business & Society

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 430-454

  Jones, Marc T ^a   Fleming, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

capitalism; critical stakeholder analysis; critical theory; globalization; complexity; negotiated order; stakeholder theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247447390     PISSN: 00076503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0007650303259070     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Abo, T. (Ed.). (1994). Hybrid factory: The Japanese production system in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Alford, R., & Friedland, R. (1985). Powers of theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Appadurai, A. (1997). Modernity at large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4. Appadurai, A. (Ed.). (2000). Globalization: Millennial quartet. Vol. 2. Public Culture, 12-12, 1-22.
5. Amin, A. (Ed.). (1994). Post-Fordism. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
6. Aslam, A. (1998). World Bank looks at two-tiered global economy. Geneva, Switzerland: InterPress Third World News Agency.
7. Bailey, P., Parisotto, A., & Renshaw, G. (Eds). (1993). Multinationals and employment: The global economy of the 1990s. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO.
8. Barber, B. (1996). McWorld vs. Jihad. New York: Simon & Schuster.
9. Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (2000). Transnational management. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
10. Brahm, R. (1995). The theory of excessive competition. Strategic Management Journal, 19(2).
11. Brooks, D. (2000). Bobos in paradise. New York: Simon & Schuster.
12. Brummer, J. J. (1991). Corporate responsibility and legitimacy: An interdisciplinary analysis. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
13. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
14. Calton, J. M., & Kurland, N. (1996). A theory of stakeholder enabling: Giving voice to an emerging postmodern praxis of organizational discourse. In D. Boje, R. Gephart, & T.Thatchenkery (Eds.), Postmodern management and organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
16. Castells, M. (1998). End of millennium. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
17. Castells, M., & Hall, P. (1994). Techopoles of the world: The making of 21st century industrial complexes. Boston: Routlegde Kegan Paul.
18. Clarkson, M. (1995). Astakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92-117.
19. Cowling, K., & Sugden, R. (1987). Transnational monopoly capitalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20. Daboub A. J., & Calton, J. M. (2002). Stakeholder learning dialogues: How to preserve ethical responsibility in networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1-2), 85-98.
21. Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22. Dicken, P. (2003). Global shift. London: Paul Chapman.
23. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 65-91.
24. Elliot, I. (1999). A new world disorder. Sydney Morning Herald, 4, 26-27.
25. Fligstein, A. (1991). Financial hegemony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic stakeholder management. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
27. Freeman, R. E., & Philips, R. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A Libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 331-349.
28. Freeman, R. E. (1991). Business ethics: The state of the art. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Friedman, J. (1995). Global system, globalization and the parameters of modernity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities. London: Sage Ltd.
30. Friedman, T. (2000). The Lexus and the olive tree. New York: HarperCollins.
31. Gereffi, G. (1994). The organization of buyer-driven global commodity chains: How U.S. retailers shape overseas production networks. In G. Gereffi & M. Korzeniewicz (Eds.), Commodity chains and global capitalism. New York: Praeger.
32. Gereffi, G., & Korzeniewicz, M. (Eds.). (1994). Commodity chains and global capitalism. New York: Praeger.
33. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. New York: Macmillan.
34. Greider, W. (1997). One world, ready or not. New York: Simon & Schuster.
35. Gullién, M. F. (2001). The limits of convergence: Globalization and organizational change in Argentina, South Korea, and Spain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action(Vols. 1 & 2). Boston: Beacon.
37. Hannerz, U. (1996) Transnational connections: Culture, people, places. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
38. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Harrison, B. (1997). Lean and mean. New York: Basic Books.
40. Harrison, B., & Bluestone, B. (1988). The great U-turn. New York: Basic Books.
41. Harvey, D. (1997). Justice, nature & the geography of difference. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
42. Held, D. (1995). Cosmopolitan democracy. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
43. Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
44. Henderson, H. (1996). Building a win-win world: Life beyond economic welfare. Berlin: Berrett-Koehler.
45. Hutton, W., & Giddens, A. (2000). The globalization debate. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46. ILO. (2001). World employment report: Life at work in the information economy. Geneva, Switerland.
47. Jacobs, D., & Getz, K. (1995). Dialogue on stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 793-795.
48. Jones, G. (1997). International business. New York: McGraw-Hill.
49. Jones, M. (1996). Missing the forest for the trees: A critique of the social responsibility concept and discourse. Business & Society, 35(1), 1-27.
50. Jones, M. (1998). Blade runner capitalism, the transnational corporation, and commodification: Implications for cultural integrity. Cultural Dynamics, 10(3), 42-66.
51. Jones, M. (1999). The competitive advantage of the transnational corporation as an institutional form: A reassessment. International Journal of Social Economics, 22(3), 20-34.
52. Jones, M., & Venkatesh, A. (1996). A critical analysis of the role of the multinational corporation in global marketing and consumption. In R. W. Belk, N. Dholakia, & A. Venkatesh (Eds.), Consumption and marketing: Macro dimensions. Cincinnatti, OH: South-Western College Publishers.
53. Kelsey, J. (1996). The New Zealand experiment. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland Press.
54. Krugman, P. (1990). The age of diminished expectations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
56. Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1994). Economies of signs and space. London: Sage Ltd.
57. Leamer, E. (1996). Wage inequality from international competition and technological. American Economic Review, 86, 309-314.
58. Luttwak, E. (1999). Turbo-capitalism. New York: HarperCollins.
59. Measuring globalization. (2003, January-February). Foreign Policy, 60-74.
60. Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World-society and the nationstate. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 144-183.
61. Mishel, L., Bernstein, J., & Boushey, H. (2002). The state of working America, 2002-2003. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
62. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-866.
63. Moody, K. (1997). Workers in a lean world. London: Verso.
64. Moran, T. H. (1999). Foreign direct investment and development: The new policy agenda for developing countries and economies in transition. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
65. O'Conner, J. (1987). The meaning of crisis. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
66. Ohmae, K. (1995). The end of the nation state. New York: Free Press.
67. Palvia, P., Palvia, S., & Roche, E. (Eds.). (1996). Global information technology and systems management: Key issues and trends. Nashua: Ivy League Publishing.
68. Pollin, R. (2000, May/June). Anatomy of Clintonomics. New Left Review, 3-35.
69. Reed, D. (1999). The realms of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 21, 23-36.
70. Reed, D. (2002). Employing normative stakeholder theory in developing countries. Business and Society, 41, 166-208.
71. Reich, R. (1991). The work of nations. New York: Vintage.
72. Rifkin, J. (1997). The end of work. New York: Putnam.
73. Roberston, R. (1992) Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: Sage Ltd.
74. Sassen, S. (1996). Whose city is it? Public Culture, 8(2).
75. Sassen, S. (1998). Globalization and its discontents. New York: New Press.
76. Schiller, H. (1989). Corporate Inc. New York: Free Press.
77. Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character. New York: Norton.
78. Simon, D., van Spengen, W., Dixon, C., & Naarman, A. (Eds.). (1995). Structurally adjusted Africa. London: Pluto.
79. Sklair, L. (1995). Sociology of the global system. Baltimore, MD: JohnsHopkins University Press.
80. Stiglitz, G. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: Free Press.
81. Strange, S. (1998). The retreat of the state. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
82. Stroper, M., & Salais, R. (1997). Worlds of production: The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
83. Trevino, L., & Weaver, G. (1999). Letter toAMRregarding “Convergence Stakeholder Theory.” Academy of Management Review, 24, 621-626.
84. United Nations. (2002). Human development report: Inequalities in income and consumption. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
85. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2000a). World investment report: TNC's and export competitiveness. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.
86. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2000b). Trade and development report: Developing countries in world trade. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.
87. U.S. Department of Commerce. (1999). The digital divide. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
88. Van Buren, H. J. (2001). If fairness is the problem, is consent the solution? Integrating ISCT and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11, 481-499.
89. Wallerstein, I. (1979). The capitalist world economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
90. Waring, M. (1998, August). Shit work. Public lecture presented at the University of Auckland, New Zealand.
91. Weiss, A. (1995, November 1). Cracks in the foundation of stakeholder theory. Electronic Journal of Radical Organization Theory. Retrieved June 7, 2003 from http://www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/depts/sml/journal/ejrot.htm
92. Wood, D. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691-718.