The Curious Historical Determinism of Randall Collins

European Journal of Sociology

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 247-269

  Misztal, Barbara ^a   Freundlieb, Dieter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247445235     PISSN: 00039756     EISSN: 14740583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0003975603001267     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adorno T., 1951, Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life (Trans. E.F.N. Jephcott, London, NLB).
2. Ahuja G., 2000, Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A longitudinal study, Administrative Science Quarterly 45, pp. 425–455.
3. Barbalet J., 2002, Science and Emotions, Sociological Review Monograph.
4. Chalmers A., 1990, Science and Its Fabrications (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press).
5. Cole S., 1992, Making Science: Between Nature and Society (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
6. Collins H. M., 1974, The TEA Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks, Science Studies 4, pp. 165–185.
7. Collins H. M. and Yearley S., 1992, Epistemological Chicken in A. Pickering ed., Science as Practice and Culture (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, pp. 311–326).
8. Collins R., 1975, Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science (New York, Academic Press).
9. Crane D., 1972, Invisible Collages (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
10. Elster J. 1999, Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
11. Fleck L. 1979 [1935], Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
12. Freundlieb D. 1980, Identification, Interpretation, and Explanation. Some Problems in the Philosophy of Literary Studies Poetics 9, pp. 423–440.
13. Freundlieb D. 1983, Can Meanings be Objects of Knowledge? Poetics 12, pp. 259–275.
14. Freundlieb D. 1999, Knowledge of Objects versus Knowledge of Meanings: A Defence of the Science/Hermeneutics Distinction, Conceptus 32, pp. 81–98.
15. Goldgar A., 1995, Impolite Learning (New Haven, Yale University Press).
16. Goodman D., 2001, What Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies Says About Sociological Theory, Sociological Theory 19, pp. 91–101.
17. Granovetter M., 1973, The Strength of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology 78, pp. 1360–1380.
18. Halbwachs M., 1950, The Collective Memory, trans. Ditter F.J. and V.Y Ditter, intro. M. Douglas (London, Harper Colophon Books, first published: 1926).
19. Halbwachs M 1992, On Collective Memory, ed., intro. and trans. by L. A. Coser (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, first published: 1941 and 1952).
20. Hansen M. T., 1999, The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 44, pp. 82–111.
21. Henrich D., 1991, Konstellationen. Probleme und Debatten am Ursprung der idealistischen Philosophie (1789–1795) (Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta).
22. Henrich D., 1992, Der Grund im Bewuβtsein. Untersuchungen zu Hölderlins Denken (1794–1795) (Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta).
23. Kuhn T. S., 1969, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, Chicago University Press).
24. Lakatos Imre, 1970, History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions in Ian Hacking ed., Scientific Revolutions (Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 106–127).
25. Latour B. and S. Woolgar, 1986, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton N.J., Princeton University Press).
26. McLaughlin N., 2002, Optimal marginality: Innovation and Orthodoxy in Fromm's Revision of Psychoanalysis, The Sociological Quarterly 42, pp. 271–290.
27. Merton R. K., 1970, Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth-Century England (New York, Harper).
28. Misztal B. A., 2003, Theories of Social Remembering (Buckingham, Open University Press).
29. Nemedi D., 1998, Change, Innovation and Creation: Durkheim's Ambivalence, in Allen N. J., W. S. F. Pickering and W. Watts Miller eds, On Durkheim's Elementary Forms of Religious Life (London, Routledge, pp. 162–175).
30. Polanyi M., 1958, The Study of Man (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
31. Polanyi M., 1967, The Tacit Dimension (New York, Doubleday).
32. Polanyi M., 1969, Knowing and Being (London, Routledge).
33. Popper K. R., 1972, Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (Oxford, Clarendon).
34. Prager J., 1998, Presenting the Past: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Misremembering (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
35. Price D. and J. de Solla, 1963, Little Science, Big Science (New York, Columbia University Press).
36. Reckwitz A., 2002, Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing, European Journal of Social Theory 5, pp. 243–264.
37. Ricceur P., 1999, Memory and Forgetting, in Kearney R. and M. Dooley eds, Questioning Ethics (London, Routledge, pp. 5–12).
38. Sartre P., 1972, The Psychology of Imagination, (trans. H. Barnes, London, Methuen).
39. Schwartz B., 2000, Abraham Lincoln and the Forge of National Memory (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
40. Searle J. R., 1995, The Construction of Social Reality (Harmondsworth, Penguin).
41. Skinner Q., 1969, Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas, History and Theory 8, pp. 3–53.
42. Trigg R., 2001, Understanding Social Science (Oxford, Blackwell, 2n ed.).
43. Whitley R., 1984, The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
44. Zerubavel E., 1997, Social Mindscape: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).