History, language planners, and strategies of forgetting: The problem of consciousness in the Philippines;Historio, lingvoplanistoj kaj strategioj de forgesado: La problemo de konscio en Filipinoj

Language Problems and Language Planning

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-25

  Tupas, T Ruanni F ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247437686     PISSN: 02722690     EISSN: 15699889     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/lplp.27.1.02tup     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Agoncillo, T. 1956. The Revolt of the Masses — The Story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan. Quezon City: University of the Philippines.
2. Anderson, B. 1988. Cacique Democracy in the Philippines: Origins and Dreams. New Left Review 169:3-31.
3. Barrows, D. 1907. History of the Philippines. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
4. Bello, W., et al. 1982. Development Debacle: The World Bank in the Philippines. San Francisco: Institute for Food and Development Policy.
5. Board of Education Survey. 1925. A Survey of the Educational System of the Philippine Islands. Manila: Bureau of Printing.
6. Canieso-Doronilla, M. 1998. The emergence of schools of the people and the transformation of the Philippine educational system. UP-CIDS Chronicle 3/1: 63-97.
7. Canieso-Doronilla, M.1989. The Limits of Educational Change — National Identity Formation in a Philippine Public Elementary School. Philippines: University of the Philippines Press.
8. Castillo, E. 2000. The Philippines. In W. Ho and R. Wong (eds.), Language Policies and Language Education. Singapore: Times Academic Press.
9. Chaibong, H. and Seog-gun, K. 2001. Remembering Japan and North Korea — the politics of memory in South Korea. In G. Gong (ed.), Memory and History — Issues of Identity in International Relations. Washington, D.C.: The CSIS Press, 101-112.
10. Constantino, R. 1975. A History of the Philippines: From the Spanish Colonization to the Second World War (with the collaboration of Letizia Constantino). New York and London: Monthly Review Press.
11. Constantino, R. 1970. The Mis-Education ofthe Filipino. Journal of Contemporary Asia 1/1:20-36.
12. De Quiros, C. 2001. Keeping the Flame Alive (There’s the Rub). The Philippine Daily Inquirer. http://www.inquirer.net/issues/feb2001/feb02/opinion/qui.htm.
13. Elon, A. 1997. A Blood-dimmed Tide. New York: Columbia University Press.
14. Fast, J. 1973. Imperialism andbourgeois dictatorship in the Philippines. NewLeftReview 78: 69-96.
15. Frei, E. 1950. The historical development of the Philippine national language (Chapter Three). Philippine Social Sciences and Humanities Review 15/1:45-79.
16. Frei, E. 1949. The historical development of the Philippine national language (Chapter One). Philippine Social Sciences and Humanities Review 14/4:367-400.
17. Fullante, L. 1983. The National Language Question in the Philippines, 1936 to the Present. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.
18. Gong, G. (ed.). 2001. Memory and History — Issues of Identity in International Relations. Washington, D.C.: The CSIS Press.
19. Gonzalez, A. 1999. Philippine bilingual education revisited. In M. Bautista and G. Tan (eds.), The Filipino Bilingual: A Multidisciplinary Perspective — Festschrift in Honor ofEmy M. Pascasio. Manila: De La Salle University Press, 11-15.
20. Gonzalez, A. 1997. The history of English in the Philippines. In M. L. Bautista (ed.), English is an Asian Language (Proceedings of the Conference held in Manila on August 2-3, 1996). Australia: Macquarie Library, 25-40.
21. Gonzalez, A.1994a. English and education in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Region: Past, present, and future. In T. Kandiah, and J. Kwan-Terry (eds.), English and Language Planning: A Southeast Asian Contribution. Centre for Advanced Studies: National University of Singapore, 92-105.
22. Gonzalez, A. 1994b. Language and nationalism in the Philippines: An update. In A. Hassan (comp.), Language Planning in Southeast Asia. Malaysia: Ministry of Education, 253-267.
23. Gonzalez, A. 1988a. English and economics in the Philippines. In A Gonzalez (ed.), The Role of English and its Maintenance in the Philippines. Manila: Solidaridad Publishing House, 105-113.
24. Gonzalez, A.1988b. English language teaching and the New Constitution. Philippine Studies 36: 485-493.
25. Gonzalez, A. 1984. Language dilemma in Philippine Academia: nationalism or modernization? In J. Pride (ed.), Language for the Third World Universities. New Delhi: Bahri, 23-38
26. Gonzalez, A. 1980. Language and Nationalism: The Philippine Experience Thus Far. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila.
27. Gonzalez, A. 1976. Content in English language materials in the Philippines: A case study of cultural and linguistic emancipation. Philippine Studies 24: 443-454.
28. Gonzalez, A. and M. Bautista. 1986. Language Surveys in the Philippines (1966-1984). Manila: De La Salle University Press.
29. Gonzalez, A.and B. Sibayan (eds.). 1988. Evaluating Bilingual Education in the Philippines (1974-1985). Manila: Linguistic Society ofthe Philippines.
30. Hau, C. 1998. Literature, nationalism, and the problem of consciousness. Diliman Review 46/3-4:3-24.
31. Ileto, R. 2001. Colonial wars in Southern Luzon: remembering and forgetting. Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies 33:103-118.
32. Ileto, R. 1999. Knowing America’s Colony — A Hundred Years from the Philippine War (Philippine Studies Occasional Papers Series No. 13). Center for Philippine Studies, School of Hawaiian, Asian and Pacific Studies, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
33. Ileto, R. 1979. Pasyon and Revolution: Popular Movements in the Philippines 1840-1910. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
34. Jose, V. 1982. The World and the University. Diliman Review March-April: 14-16.
35. Kandiah, T (1994). English and Southeast Asian language planning practice: extracting regional patterns and theoretical principles. In T. Kandiah, and J. Kwan-Terry (eds.), English and Language Planning: A Southeast Asian Contribution. Singapore: Centre for Advanced Studies, National University of Singapore, 281-305.
36. Lopez, C. 1980. Foreword. In A. Gonzalez, Language and Nationalism: The Philippine Experience Thus Far. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila. v-vi.
37. Lopez, S. 1966. The colonial relationship. In F. Golay H. (ed.), Philippine-American Relations. Manila, Bombay, New York: Solidaridad Publishing House, 7-31.
38. Mayer, A. 1993. Memory and history: on the poverty of remembering and forgetting the Judeocide. Radical History Review 56:5-20.
39. Mazrui, Alamin M. 1997. The World Bank, the language question and the future of African education. Race & Class 38/3:35-48.
40. Mojares, R. 1999. The War Against the Americans — Resistance and Collaboration in Cebu 1899-1906. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila Press.
41. Mulder, N. 1990. Philippine textbooks and the national self-image. Philippine Studies 38: 84-102.
42. Peet, R. 1999. Theories of Development (with Elaine Hartwick). New York and London: The Guilford Press.
43. Pennycook, A. 2001. Critical Applied Linguistics: A Critical Introduction. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum.
44. Pennycook, A.1998. English and the Discourses of Colonialism. London and New York: Routledge.
45. Pomeroy, W. 1992. The Philippines: Colonialism, Collaboration, and Resistance. New York: International Publishers.
46. Pomeroy, W. 1974. An American Made Tragedy — Neocolonialism & Dictatorship in the Philippines. New York: International Publishers.
47. Pomeroy, W. 1970. American Neo Colonialism — Its Emergence in the Philippines and Asia. New York: International Publishers.
48. Rafael, V. 2000. White Love and Other Events in Filipino History. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
49. Rafael, V. 1992. Confession, conversion, and reciprocity in early Tagalog colonial society. In N. Dirks (ed.), Colonialism and Culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 65-88.
50. Raines, F. (1999). Indigenous knowledge, historical amnesia and intellectual authority: deconstructing hegemony and the social and political implications of the curricular “Other”. In L. Semali and J. Kincheloe (eds.), What Is Indigenous Knowledge? Voices from the Academy. New York and London: Falmer Press, 317-331.
51. Ricoeur, P. (1999). Memory and forgetting. In R. Kearney andM. Dooley (eds.), Questioning Ethics — Contemporary Debates in Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge, 5-11.
52. San Juan, E. 1998. One hundred years of reproducing and reproducing the ‘Filipino’. Amerasia Journal 24/2:1-35.
53. Schirmer, D. and S. Shalom (eds). 1987. The Philippines Reader — A History of Colonialism, Neocolonialism, Dictatorship, and Resistance. Quezon City: KEN incorporated.
54. Schott, J. 1964. The Ordeal of Samar. Indianapolis and New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
55. Sibayan, B. 2000. Resulting patterns of sociolinguistic, socioeconomic, and cultural practice and behavior after more than four hundred years of language policy and practice in the Philippines. In M. L. Bautista, T. Llamzon, and B. Sibayan (eds.), Parangal CangBrother Andrew. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines, 247-261.
56. Sibayan, B. 1999a. The Intellectualization of Filipino and Other Essays on Education and Sociolinguistics. Manila: The Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
57. Sibayan, B. 1999b. Language planning in the Philippines: A historical perspective with English in focus. Journal of Asian English Studies 2/1& 2:1-16.
58. Sibayan, B. 1994a. Philippine language problems. In The Language Issue in Education. Manila: Congressional Committee on Education.
59. Sibayan, B.1994b. The role and status of English vis-à-vis Filipino and other languages in the Philippines. In T. Kandiah and J. Kwan-Terry (eds.), English and Language Planning: Southeast Asian Contribution. Singapore: Centre for Advanced Studies, National University of Singapore, 218-241.
60. Sibayan, B. 1991. Becoming bilingual in English in a non-English environment (a retrospective essay in honor of Joshua A. Fishman). In O. Garcia (ed.), Focus on Bilingual Education — Essays in Honor of Joshua A. Fishman on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday, Vol. 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 283-296.
61. Sibayan, B. and Gonzalez, A. 1996. Post-imperial English in the Philippines. In J. Fishman, A. Condrad and A. Rubal-Lopez (eds.), Post-Imperial English — Status Change in Former British and American Colonies, 1940-1990. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 139-172.
62. Smolicz, J. 1996. The national language in the Philippines — a comparative study of the educational status of “colonial” and indigenous languages with special reference to minority tongues. In B. Spolsky (ed.), Language and Education in Multilingual Settings. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 96-115.
63. Sta. Maria, F. 1999. On the teaching of English. Journal of Asian English Studies 2/1& 2: 84-89.
64. Stanzel, Volker. 2001. Remembering and forgetting — But will the past forget about us? In G. Gong (ed.), Memory and History — Issues of Identity in International Relations. Washington, D.C.: The CSIS Press, 3-15.
65. Tollefson, J. 1986. Language policy and the radical left in the Philippines: The New People’s Army and its antecedents. Language Problems & Language Planning 10/2:177-189.
66. Yabes, L. 1970. The English program in the university. Education Quarterly 18/1& 2:15-33.