Hydrological response to land use changes in central european lowland forest catchments

Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 3-13

  Okoński, Bernard ^a  

^a POZNA UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

Author keywords

Direct runoff; Forest catchment; Land cover changes; Rainfall runoff modeling; SCS CN method

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; FORESTRY; RAIN;

DIRECT RUNOFF; FOREST CATCHMENT; LAND COVER CHANGES; RAINFALL RUNOFF MODELING; SCS-CN METHOD;

LAND USE;

FORESTRY; LAND USE; RAIN; RESERVOIRS;

EID: 34247397788     PISSN: 16486897     EISSN: 18224199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/16486897.2007.9636902     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. SULINSKI, J., 1995. “ Czynniki różnicujac wartości składowych bilansu wodnego drzewostanów zagospodarowanych zrebowo ”. In Sylwan Vol. 11, 49–65. Warszawa
2. ANDREASSIAN, V., 2004. Waters and forests:from historical controversy to scientific debate. Journal of Hydrology, 291:1–27.
3. SULINSKI, J., 2002. “ Podstawowe założenia w nauczaniu hydrologii leśnej ”. In Sylwan Vol. 12, 69–79. Warszawa
4. SWANK, W., MEYER, J., and CROSSLEY, D. A., Jr. 2001. “ Long-term ecological research:Coweeta history and perspectives ”. In Holistic Science:The Evolution of the Georgia Institute of Ecology (1940–2000), 143–163. Ann Arbor:Sheridan Books. Chapter 8
5. MCDONNELL, J., and WOODS, R., 299. On the need for catchment classification. Journal of Hydrology, 2004:2–3.
6. SEIBERT, J., 1999. Conceptual runoff models fiction or representation of reality?, 436Uppsala:Acta Universitatis Uppsaliensis. Compr. Summ. of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology
7. LORUP, J., REFSGAARD, J., and MAZVIMAVI, D., 205. Assessing the effect of land use change on catchment runoff by combined use of statistical tests and hydrological modeling:case studies from Zimbabwe. Journal of Hydrology, 1998:147–163.
8. BRAUD, I., VICH, A., ZULUAGA, J., FORNERO, L., and PEDRANI, A., 114. Vegetation influence on runoff and sediment yield in the Andes region:observation and modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 2001:124–144.
9. HUNDECHA, Y., and BARDOSSY, A., 292. Modeling of the effect of land use changes on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model. Journal of Hydrology, 2004:281–295.
10. CAMORANI, G., CASTELLARIN, A., and BRATH, A., 30. Effects of land-use changes on the hydrologic response of reclamation systems. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2005:561–574.
11. CHANG, M., 2003. Forest Hydrology, Washington:CRC Press.
12. 2006. “ Global Forest Recourses Assessment. Progress towards sustainable forest management ”. Rome:UN FAO, ID.
13. NASH, J. E., 10. Determining runoff from rainfall. Proc. of Institution of Civil Engineers, 1958:163–184.
14. BEAVEN, K. J., 2001. Rainfall-runoff modeling. The primer, Chichester:Wiely.
15. MILER, A., 1994. “ Wymiar fraktalny sieci rzecznych w małych zlewniach Wielkopolski ”. In Rocz. AR Pozn., 268, Melior. Inż. Srod. 255–266. Poznań 15, 1
16. MILER, A., 1981. Podstawy automatyki, Poznań:Wyd. AR.
17. CHOW, V., MAIDMENT, D., and MAYS, L. W., 1988. Applied Hydrology, New York:McGraw-Hill Book Company.
18. 1956. “ USDA-SCS. National Engineering Handbook. Hydrology ”. Washington D.C.:US Dept. of Agriculture, National Resources Conservation Service. Section 4
19. 1972. “ USDA-SCS. National Engineering Handbook. Hydrology ”. Washington D.C.:US Dept. of Agriculture, National Resources Conservation Service. Section 4
20. 1985. “ USDA-NRCS. National Engineering Handbook. Hydrology ”. Washington D.C.:US Dept. of Agriculture, National Resources Conservation Service. Section 4
21. MISHRA, S., and SINGH, V. P., 2003b. Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) Methodology, Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
22. IGNAR, S., 1993. Metodyka obliczania przepływów wezbraniowych w zlewniach nieobserwowanych, Warszawa:Wyd. SGGW, Rozpr. Nauk. i Monogr.
23. MISHRA, S., and SINGH, V. P., 2002. SCS-CN Method. Part I:Derivation of SCS-CN-Based Models. Acta Geophysica Polonica, 50 (3):457–477.
24. HJELMFELT, A. T., 1980. Curve number procedure as infiltration method. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 106:1471–1476. (HY6)
25. MADRAMOOTOO, C., and ENRIGHT, P., 1987. Applicability of the Soil Conservation Service equations for runoff prediction in the Ottawa St.Lawrence Lowlands. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 15:759–765.
26. CORBETT, C., WAHL, M., PORTER, E., EDWARDS, D., and MOISE, C., 213. Nonpoint source runoff modeling. A comparison of a forested watershed and an urband watershed on the South Carolina coast. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 1997:133–149.
27. JOHNSON, R. R., 1998. An Investigation of Curve Number Applicability to Watersheds in Excess of 25000 Hectares (250 km2). Journal of Environmental Hydrology, 6 (5):1–10.
28. LYON, S., WALTER, T., MARCHANT, P., and STEENHUIS, T. S., 18. Using a topographic index to distribute variable source area runoff predicted with the SCS Curve Number equation. Hydrol. Processes, 2004:2757–2771.
29. HAWKINS, R. H., 1979. Runoff curve numbers from partial area watersheds. Proc. American Society of Civil Engineering, 105(IR4):375–369.
30. HJELMFELT, A., WOODWARD, D., CONAWAY, G., PLUMMER, A., QUAN, Q., VANMULLEM, J., HAWKINS, R., and RIETZ, D., Curve Numbers, Recent Developments. International Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Research (IAHR). September16–21. pp. 1–13. Beijing:Congress Proceedings.
31. MISHRA, S., and SINGH, V. P., 2003a. SCS-CN Method. Part II:Analytical Treatment. Acta Geophysica Polonica, 51 (1):107–123.
32. WOODWARD, D., HAWKINS, R., JIANG, R., HJELMFELT, A., VAN MULLEM, J., and QUAN, D. Q., Runoff Curve Number Method:Examination of the Initial Abstraction Ratio. A.S.C.E./E.W.R.I. World Water and Environmental Resources Congress. Jun24–262003. Philadelphia:Proceedings.
33. OKONSKI, B., 2004. Aktualny stan stosunków wodnych w Puszczy Zielonka i kierunki przewidywanych zmian, Maszyn:KIL. AR, Poznań.