Are "universal design resources" designed for designers?

Eighth International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS 2006

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 87-94

  Choi, Young Sang ^a   Yi, Ji Soo ^a   Law, Chris M ^b,c   Jacko, Julie A ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b University of Marylandw Baltimore County   (United States)

^c RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Assistive technology; Design resources; Heuristic evaluation; Universal design

Indexed keywords

CONTENT BASED RETRIEVAL; HANDICAPPED PERSONS; HEURISTIC METHODS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; WEBSITES;

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; COGNITIVE PROCESSES; DESIGN RESOURCES;

LOGIC DESIGN;

EID: 34247376579     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1168987.1169003     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. Telecommunication Act Accessibility Guidelines. Date Accessed: June 2, 2006, http://www.access-board.gov/telecomm/rule.htm, 1998.
2. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards. Date Accessed: June 2, 2006, http://www.aceess-board.gov/sec508/standards.htm, 2000.
3. Arizona Technology Access Program. Universal Design Resource List. Date Accessed: June 2, 2006, http://www.nau.edu/ihd/aztap/factsheets/universal.shtml.
4. Bums, C. M., Vicente, K. J., Christoffersen, K., and Pawlak, W. S. Towards viable, useful and usable human factors design guidance. Applied Ergonomics, 28, 5/6 (1997), 311-322.
5. COST 219 European Telecommunications Forum. Accessibility for All to Services and Terminals for Next Generation Networks. Date Accessed: June 2, 2006, http://www.cost219.org.
6. The National Disability Authority. Accessibility Guidelines for Public Access Terminals. Date Accessed: June 2, 2006, http://accessit.nda.ie/ technologyindex_2.html.
7. Kantner, L., Shroyer, R., and Rosenbaum, S. Structured Heuristic Evaluation of Online Documentation in Proceedings of IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC 2002) (Portland, OR, USA, September 17-20, 2002).
8. Keates, S., Lebbon, C., and Clarkson, J. Investigating Industry Attitudes to Universal Design in Proceedings of Rehabilitation Engineering and assistive technology Society of North America (RESNA), Annual Conference (Orlando, FL, USA, June 28-July 2, 2000), 276-278.
9. Law, C., Jacko, J., and Edwards, P. Programmer-focused website accessibility evaluations in Proceedings of the 7th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility (Baltimore, MD, USA, 2005), 20-27.
10. Law, C. M., Jacko, J. A., Yi, J. S., and Choi, Y. S. Developing new heuristics for evaluating universal design standards and guidelines in Proceedings of the Ergonomics Society Annual Conference (Cambridge, UK, April 4-6, 2006).
11. Lawson, B. How Designers Think: The design process demystified 3rd Edition. Architectural Press, Burlington, MA, 2006.
12. Mace, R. Universal Design: Housing for the Lifespan of All People. US Department of Housing and Urban Affairs, Washington, DC, USA, 1988.
13. Nielsen, J., "Heuristic Evaluation", in Usability inspection methods, Nielsen, J. and Mack, R. L., Eds., Wiley, 1994.
14. Preiser, W. and Ostroff, E. Universal Design Handbook 1st Edition. McGraw-Hill Professional, 2001.
15. Purho, V. Heuristic Inspections for Documentation - 10 Recommended Documentation Heuristics. Newsletter, Date Accessed: May 25, 2006, http://stcsig.org/usability/newsletter/0004-docsheuristics.html, 2000.
16. Royal National Institute of the Blind. Access-Ability: Making technology more useable by people with disabilities. Date Accessed: June 2, 2006, http://www.tiresias.org/guidelines/access-ability/.
17. Smith, J. What can legislation do for design? in Proceedings of 11th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (Paris, France, 1991), 1058-1060.
18. Stephanidis, C., et al., "Industrial Policy Issues", in User interfaces for all: Concepts, Methods, and Tools, Stephanidis, C., Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., 2001.
19. Stephanidis, C. and Salvendy, G. Toward an Information Society for All: An International R&D Agenda. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 10, 2(1998), 107-134.
20. The Australian Banker's Association. Industry Standards on Accessibility of Electronic Banking. Date Accessed: June 2,2006, http://www.bankers.asn.au/, 2003.
21. The Center for Universal Design (North Carolina State University). Universal Design Education Online. Date Accessed: June 2, 2006, http://www.udeducation.org/.
22. The Helen Hamlyn Research Centre. Inclusive Design Education Resource. Date Accessed: June 2, 2006, http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/ inclusivedesignresource.
23. The National Council on Disability, Design for Inclusion: Creating a New Marketplace, Industry White Paper. Date Accessed: June 2, 2006, http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publications/2004/newmarketplace.htm, 2004, 97-106.
24. The National Endowment for the Arts. Resource: Accessibility. Date Accessed: June 2, 2006, http://www.nea.gov/resources/Accessibility/index.html.
25. The World Wide Web Consortium. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. Date Accessed: July, 24, 2006, http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/, 1999.