PACFISH/INFISH Biological Opinion (PIBO): Effectiveness monitoring program sevan-year status report 1998 through 2004

USDA Forest Service - General Technical Report RMRS-GTR

Volumn , Issue 162 RMRS-GTR, 2005, Pages 1-20

  Henderson, Richard C ^a,b   Archer, Eric K ^a   Bouwes, Boyd A ^a   Coles Ritchie, Marc C ^a   Kershner, Jeffrey L ^a  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b PACFISH/INFISH Effectiveness Monitoring Program

Author keywords

Budget; Change detection; Current condition; Effectiveness monitoring; PIBO; Sampling protocol

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM; LAND MANAGEMENT; MONITORING; RIPARIAN ZONE; SAMPLING;

COLUMBIA BASIN; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 34247372627     PISSN: 02775786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Anderson, A.; Kliewer, G.; Dugaw, D. 2004. Effectiveness monitoring project for streams and riparian areas within the upper Columbia River basin, annual Report. Logan, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Annual reports are produced for each of the 20 National Forests, three Forest Service Regions, and two BLM State Offices.
2. Archer E. K.; Roper, B. B. [In preparation]. Comparison and precision of two substrate sampling techniques. Logan, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory.
3. Archer, E. K.; Roper, B. B.; Henderson, R. C.; Bouwes, N.; Mellison, S. C.; Kershner, J. L. 2004. Testing common stream sampling methods for broad-scale, long-term monitoring. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-122. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 15 p.
4. Coles-Ritchie, M. 2004. Evaluation of riparian vegetation data and associated sampling Techniques. Logan, UT. Utah State University: 204 p. Dissertation.
5. Coles-Ritchie, M.; Henderson, R. C.; Archer, E. K.; Roper, B. B.; Kennedy, C.; Kershner, J. L. 2004a. The repeatability of riparian vegetation sampling methods: how useful are these techniques for broad-scale, long-term monitoring? Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-138. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 18 p.
6. Coles-Ritchie, M.; Henderson, R.; Culumber, M.; Kelly, M. 2004b. Effectiveness monitoring for streams and riparian areas: sampling protocol for riparian vegetation parameters. Unpublished paper on file at: http://www.fs.fed.us/biology/fishecology/emp. 32 p.
7. Coles-Ritchie, M.; Kelly, A. [In preparation]. Assessing accuracy in plant identification in a riparian monitoring protocol. Logan, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory.
8. Dugaw, D.; Anderson, A.; Archer, E. K.; Henderson, R. C.; Kershner, J. L. 2004. Effectiveness monitoring for streams and riparian areas: sampling protocol for stream channel parameters. Unpublished paper on file at: http://www.fs.fed.us/biology/fishecology/emp. 62 p.
9. Heitke, J.; Henderson R. C.; Roper B. B.; Archer, E. K. [Submitted]. Evaluation of two streambank alteration methods. Journal of Range Management.
10. Kershner, J. L.; Archer, E. K.; Coles-Ritchie, M.; Cowley, E.; Henderson, R. C.; Kratz, K.; Quimby, C.; Turner, D. L.; Ulmer, L. C.; Vinson, M. R. 2004a. Guide to effective monitoring of aquatic and riparian resources. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-121. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 57 p.
11. Kershner, J. L.; Bouwes, N.; Roper, B.; Henderson, R. C. 2004b. An analysis of stream habitat conditions in reference and managed watersheds on some federal lands within the Columbia basin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 24:1363-1375.
12. Olsen, D. S.; Roper, B.; Kershner, J. L.; Henderson, R. C.; Archer, E. K. [Accepted], Sources of variability in conducting pebble counts and their potential influence on the results of stream monitoring programs. Journal of the American Water Resources Association.
13. Roper, B. [In preparation]. The use of macroinvertebrates to evaluate differences in reference and managed watersheds within the Columbia Basin. Logan, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory.
14. Roper, B.; Kershner, J. L.; Archer, E.; Henderson, R. C.; Bouwes, N. 2002. An evaluation of physical habitat attributes used to monitor streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 38: 1-10.
15. Roper, B. B.; Kershner J. L.; Henderson R. C. 2003. The value of using permanent sites when evaluating steam attributes at the reach scale. Journal of Freshwater Ecology. 18:585-592.
16. USDA Forest Service, USDI Bureau of Land Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service, USDC NOAA Fisheries. 2003. Implementation monitoring program module for Pacfish/Infish and the 1998 Biological Opinions for salmon, steelhead, and bull trout - program manual. On the Web at: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/boise/teams/ fisheries/pac_infish/pac_infishhome.htm.
17. USDI. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1998. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: determination of threatened status for the Klamath River and Columbia River distinct population segments of bull trout final rule. Federal Register June 10, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 111, Pages 31647-31674) 50 CFR Part 17, RIN 1018-AB94.
18. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service. 1998. Endangered Species Act - Section 7 Consultation. Biological Opinion, Land and Resource Management Plans for National Forests and Bureau of Land Management Resource Areas in the Upper Columbia River Basin and Snake River Basin Evolutionarily Significant Units., Northwest Region, Seattle, Washington.
19. Whitacre, H. 2004. Comparison of USFS and EPA stream protocol methodologies and observer precision for physical habitat on Oregon and Idaho streams. Logan, UT: Utah State University. 72 p. Thesis.