Intersectoral wage linkages: The case of Sweden

Empirical Economics

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 161-184

  Friberg, Kent ^a  

^a Monetary Policy Department   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Exposedand sheltered sectors; Scandinavian model of inflation; Sectoral wage linkages; Vectorerror correction (VEC) models; Wage adaptability; Wage leadership

Indexed keywords

COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC CONDITIONS; ERROR CORRECTION; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; INFLATION; MANUFACTURING; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; WAGE;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

EID: 34247370155     PISSN: 03777332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00181-006-0077-2     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Akaike H (1969) Fitting autoregressive models for prediction. Ann Inst Stat Math 21:243-247
2. Andersson P, Isaksson A (1997) Is private sector pay formation affected by the central government in Sweden: A causal analysis. Mimeograph, Swedish Agency for Government Employers, Stockholm
3. Aukrust O (1970a) PRIM I: A model of the price and income distribution mechanism of an open economy. Rev Income Wealth, series 16, pp 51-78
4. Aukrust O (1970b), PRIM I: A model of the price and income distribution mechanism of an open economy. Artikler no. 35, Statistisk Sentralbyr̊, Oslo
5. Aukrust O (1977) Inflation in the open economy: A Norwegian model." Artikler no. 96, Statistisk Sentralbyr̊, Oslo
6. Bergman M, Warne A (1993) Money-income causality and the neutrality of money. Manuscript, Department of Economics, Lund University
7. Björklund A, Edin P, Holmlund B, Wadensjö E (2000) Arbetsmarknaden. SNS Förlag, Stockholm
8. Calmfors L, Forslund A (1990) Wage Formation in Sweden. In: Calmfors Lars (eds) Wage formation and macroeconomic policy in the Nordic countries, SNS Förlag. Stockholm and Oxford University Press, Oxford
9. Cooper R, John A (1988) Coordinating coordination failures in Keynesian models. Q J Econ. 103(3):441-463
10. De la Croix D (1994) Employment response to supply and demand shocks under envy in wage formation. De Economist 142:1-17
11. Doornik JA, Hansen H (1994) An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Economic papers W4 & 91, Nuffield College, University of Oxford
12. Edgren G, Faxén K, Odhner C (1973) Wage Formation and the Economy. Allen & Unwin, London
13. Elmeskov J, Martin J, Scarpetta S (1998) Key lessons for labour market reforms: Evidence from OECD countries. Swed Econ Policy Rev 5:205-252 205-252
14. Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error-correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55:251-276
15. Facken inom industrin (2000) Förslag till avtalspolitisk plattform inför avtalsrörelsen 2001, Stockholm 26 September 2000
16. Faxén K, Odhner C, Spånt R (1988) Lönebildningen i 90-talets samhällsekonomi. Rabén & Sjögren, Stockholm
17. Friberg K (2004) Essays on wage and price formation in Sweden, PhD Thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm
18. Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37:424-438
19. Halttunen H, Molander A (1972) The input-output framework as a part of a macroeconomic model: Production-price-income block in the bank of Finland quarterly econometric model. Finnish Econ J 68:219-239
20. Hannan EJ, Quinn BG (1979) The determination of the order of an autoregression. J R Stat Soc, B 41, pp 190-195
21. Holmlund B, Ohlsson H (1992) Wage linkages between private and public sectors in Sweden. Labour 6:3-17
22. Jacobson T, Ohlsson H (1994) Long-run relations between private and public sector wages in Sweden. Empir Econ 19:343-360
23. Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231-254
24. Johansen S (1991) Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica 59:1551-1580
25. Johansen S (1992) Cointegration in partial systems and the efficiency of single-equation analysis. J Econ 52:389-402
26. Lindquist MJ, Vilhelmsson R (2004) Is the Swedish central government a wage leader? Working Paper Series 8/2004, Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University
27. LO (1997) Rekommendation till förbunden med gemensamma krav inför Avtal 98, Stockholm
28. LO (2000) Rekommendation till förbunden med gemensamma krav inför Avtal 2001, Stockholm
29. National Mediation Office (2002) Avtalsrörelsen och lönebildningen 2001. Medlingsinstitutets årsrapport, Stockholm February 2002
30. National Mediation Office (2003) Avtalsrörelsen och lönebildningen 2002. Medlingsinstitutets årsrapport, Stockholm February 2003
31. National Mediation Office (2005) Avtalsrörelsen och lönebildningen 2004. Medlingsinstitutets årsrapport, Stockholm January 2005
32. Osterwald-Lenum M (1992) A note with quantiles of the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood cointegration rank test statistics: Four cases. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 54:461-472
33. Ploberger W, Krämer W, Kontrus K (1989) A new test for structural stability in the linear regression model. J Econometrics 40:307-318
34. Ringstad V (1972) PRIM II: A revised version of the price and income model. Artikler no. 44, Statistisk Sentralbyr̊, Oslo
35. Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461-464
36. 2. J Am Stat Assoc 72:206-211
37. Stock JH, Watson MW (1988) Testing for common trends. J Am Stat Assoc 83:1097-1107
38. Tägtström S (2000) The wage spread between different sectors in Sweden. Sveriges Riksbank Econ Rev 4: pp 77-82
39. Uddén-Jondal E (1993) Wage formation in a unionized economy, PhD Thesis, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm
40. Wibaut Q (1995) Sectorial asymmetry and the centralisation of the wage determination in an open economy. IRES Discussion Paper No. 9529, Universite catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve