Complicity and causality

Criminal Law and Philosophy

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 127-141

  Gardner, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Causation; Complicity; Justification; Responsibility; Wrong doing

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247367701     PISSN: 18719791     EISSN: 18719805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11572-006-9018-6     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Fletcher, G. (1977). Rethinking criminal law. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
2. Gardner, J. (1996). Justifications and reasons. In A. P. Simester, & A. T. H. Smith (Eds.), Harm and culpability. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. Gardner, J. (2004). Book review. Ethics, 114, 827.
4. Glover, J. (1975). It makes no difference whether or not I do it. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 49, 171.
5. Hart, H. L. A., & Honoré, T. (1985). Causation in the law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6. Kadish, S. H. (1985). Complicity, cause, and blame: A study in the interpretation of doctrine. California Law Review, 73, 323.
7. Kutz, C. (2000). Complicity: Law and ethics for a collective age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Nagel, T. (1979). The fragmentation of value. In T. Nagel (Ed.), Mortal questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Scheffler, S. (1982). The rejection of consequentialism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11. Solzhenitsyn, A. (1972). One word of truth. London: Bodley Head.
12. von Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and action. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13. Williams, B. (1973). A critique of utilitarianism. In J. J. C. Smart, & Williams, B. (Eds.), Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.