Measurement tool requirements

Gastroenterology Nursing

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 136-138

  Schmelzer, Marilee ^a   Daniels, Glenda ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; COLONOSCOPY; FECES; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; NURSING; NURSING ASSESSMENT; PILOT STUDY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; TIME;

CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; COLONOSCOPY; DATA COLLECTION; FECES; HUMANS; NURSING ASSESSMENT; PILOT PROJECTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34247361675     PISSN: 1042895X     EISSN: 15389766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.SGA.0000267938.05361.e9     Document Type: Short Survey

References (5)

1. Allaire, J., Thompson, W., Cash, B., & Galt, D. (2003). A quality improvement project comparing two regimens of medication for colonoscopy preparation. Gastroenterology Nursing, 27, 3-8.
2. Balaban, D. H., Leavell, B. S., Oblinger, M. J., Thompson, W., Bolton, N. D., & Pambianco, D. J. (2003). Low-volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy: Randomized, endoscopist-blinded trial of liquid sodium phosphate versus tablet sodium phosphate. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 98, 827-832.
3. Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2005). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique, and utilization. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders.
4. DiPalma, J., Wolff, B., Meagher, A., & Cleveland, M. (2003). Comparison of reduced volume versus four liters sulfate free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 98, 2187-2191.
5. Rostom, A., & Jolicoeur, E. (2004). Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 59, 482-486.