Interspecific and intraspecific variation in picea engelmannii and its congeneric cohorts: Biosystematics, genecology, and climate change

USDA Forest Service - General Technical Report RMRS-GTR

Volumn , Issue 134 RMRS-GTR, 2004, Pages 1-20

  Rehfeldt, Gerald E ^a  

^a ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Climatic clines; Common garden studies; Quantitative traits; Response to climate

Indexed keywords

CIRCULATION MODELING; CLIMATE CHANGE; COHORT ANALYSIS; EVERGREEN TREE; GENETIC VARIATION; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; GLOBAL WARMING; HYBRID; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; PROVENANCE; TAXONOMY; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

BASIN AND RANGE PROVINCE; BLACK HILLS; CANADA; CYPRESS HILLS; GREAT BASIN; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

CUPRESSUS; PICEA; PICEA CHIHUAHUANA; PICEA ENGELMANNII; PICEA GLAUCA; PICEA MEXICANA; PICEA PUNGENS;

EID: 34247337651     PISSN: 02775786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Arthur, W. 1987. The niche in competition and evolution. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
2. Bongarten, B. C.; Hanover, J. W. 1986. Provenance variation in blue spruce (Picea pungens) in the Northern United States and Canada. Silvae Genetica. 35: 67-74.
3. Box, E. O.; Crumpacker, D. W.; Hardin, E. D. 1999. Predicted effects of climatic change on distribution of ecologically important native tree and shrub species in Florida. Climatic Change. 41: 213-248.
4. Brown, J. H.; Gibson, A. C. 1983. Biogeography. St. Louis, MO: C. V. Mosby.
5. Daubenmire, R. 1974. Taxonomic and ecologic relationships between Picea glauca and Picea engelmannii in the Rocky Mountains. Can. J. Bot. 52: 1545-1560.
6. Davis, M. B.; Shaw, R. G. 2001. Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science. 292: 673-679.
7. Earthinfo, Inc. 1994. Database Guide. Boulder, CO: Earthinfo.
8. Environment Canada. 1994. Canadian Monthly Climate Data and 1961-1990 Normals. Edmonton, Alberta: Prairie and Northern Region Commercial Weather Services Division.
9. Ernst, S. G.; Hanover, J. W.; Keathley, D. E. 1990. Assessment of natural interspecific hybridization of blue and Engelmann spruce in southwestern Colorado. Can. J. Bot. 68: 1489-1496.
10. Flato, G. M.; Boer, G. J. 2001. Warming Asymmetry in Climate Change Simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28: 195-198.
11. GLOBE Task Team. 1999. The Global Land One-kilometer Base Elevation (GLOBE) Digital Elevation Model, Version 1.0. Boulder, CO: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Geophysical Data Center, 325 Broadway. Digital database on the World Wide Web (URL: http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/ seg/topo/globe.shtml).
12. Gordon, C.; Cooper, C.; Senior, C.; [and others]. 2000. The simulation of SST, sea-ice extents and ocean heat transport in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Climate Dynamics. 16: 147-168.
13. Hutchinson, G. E. 1958. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 22: 415-427.
14. Hutchinson, M. F. 2000. ANUSPLIN Version 4.1 User's Guide. Canberra: Australian National University, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies.
15. IPCC. 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J.; [and others], (eds) Contributions of Working Group 1 to the Second Assessment Report of IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
16. Kossuth, S. V.; Fetchner, G. H. 1973. Incompatibility between Picea pungens Engelm. and Picea engelmannii Perry. For. Sci. 19: 50-60.
17. Ledig, F. T.; Hodgskiss, P. D.; Krutovskii, K. V.; Neale, D. B.; Eguiluz-Piedra, T. 2004. Relationships among the unusual spruces (Pinaceae) of Southwestern North America. Systematic Botany. 29: 275-295.
18. Martinez, M. 1961. Una nueva especie de Picea en Mexico. Anales del Institute de Biologia de la Universidad Nacional de Mexico 32: 137-142.
19. Miller, R. S. 1967. Pattern and process in competition. Adv. Ecol. Res. 4: 1-74.
20. Mitton, J. B.; Andalora, R. 1981. Genetic and morphologic relationships between blue spruce, Picea pungens, and Engelmann spruce, Picea engelmannii, in the Colorado Front Range. Can. J. Bot. 59: 2088-2094.
21. Monserud, R. A.; Rehfeldt, G. E. 1990. An expert system for determining compatible seed transfer locations. AI Applications. 4: 44-50.
22. Monserud, R. A.; Tchebakova, N. M.; Denissenko, O. V. 1998. Reconstruction of the mid-Holocene paleoclimate of Siberia using a bioclimatic vegetation model. Paleoclimatology. 139: 15-36.
23. Morgenstern, E. K. 1996. Geographic variation in forest trees: genetic basis and application of knowledge in silviculture. Vancouver, Canada: UBCPress.
24. Ogilvie, R. T.; von Rudloff, E. 1968. Chemosystematic studies in the genus Picea (Pinaceae). IV. The introgression of white and Engelmann spruce as found along the Bow River. Can. J. Bot. 46: 901-908.
25. Rajora, O. P.; Dancik, P. B. 1999. Population genetic variation, structure, and evolution in Engelmann spruce, white spruce, and their natural hybrid complex in Alberta. Can. J. Bot. 78: 768-780.
26. Rehfeldt, G. E. 1989. Ecological adaptations in Douglasfir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca): a synthesis. Forest Eco. & Manag. 28: 203-215.
27. Rehfeldt, G. E. 1994. Adaptation of Picea engelmannii populations to the heterogeneous environments of the Intermountain West. Can. J. Bot. 72: 1197-1208.
28. Rehfeldt, G. E. 1999. Systematics and genetic structure of Ponderosae taxa (Pinaceae) inhabiting the mountain islands of the Southwest. Am. J. Bot. 86: 741-752.
29. Rehfeldt, G. E.; Tchebakova, N. M; Parfenova, Y. I.; Wykoff, R. A.; Kuzmina, N. A.; Milyutin, L. I. 2002. Intraspecific responses to climate in Pinus sylvestris. Global Change Biology. 8: 912-929.
30. Rehfeldt, G. E.; Wykoff, R. A.; Ying, C. C. 2001. Physiologic plasticity, evolution, and impacts of a changing climate in Pinus contorta. Climatic Change. 50: 355-376.
31. Rehfeldt, G. E.; Ying, C. C.; Spittlehouse, D. L.; Hamilton, D. A. 1999. Genetic responses to climate in Pinus contorta: niche breadth, climate change, and reforestation. Ecol. Monogr. 69: 375-407.
32. Roche, L. 1969. A genecological study of the genus Picea in British Columbia. New Phytologist. 68: 505-554.
33. SAS Institute. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Vers. 5 ed., Vol. 2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
34. Shepperd, W. D.; Jeffers, R. M.; Ronco, F., Jr. 1981. An Engelmann spruce seed source study in the central Rockies. Res. Pap. RM-231. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Station.
35. Sigurgeirsson, A.; Szmidt, A. E. 1993. Phylogenetic and biogeographic implications of chloroplast DNA variation in Picea. Nordic J. Bot. 13: 233-246.
36. Taylor, R. J.; Patterson, T. F. 1980. Biosystematics of Mexican spruce species and populations. Taxon. 29: 421-469.
37. Taylor, R. J.; Patterson, T. F.; Harrod, R. J. 1994. Systematics of Mexican spruce - revisited. Systematic Bot. 19: 47-59.
38. Taylor, R. J.; Williams, S.; Daubenmire, R. 1975. Interspecific relationships and the question of introgression between Picea engelmannii and Picea pungens. Can. J. Bot. 53: 2547-2555.
39. Taylor, T. M. C. 1959. The taxonomic relationship between Picea glauca (Moench) Voss and Picea engelmannii Perry. Madrono. 15: 111-115.
40. Thompson, R. S.; Hostetler, S. W.; Bartlein, P. J.; Anderson, K. H. 2002. A strategy for assessing potential future changes in climate, hydrology, and vegetation in the Western United States. Circular 1153. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey.
41. Tuhkanen, S. 1980. Climatic parameters and indices in plant geography. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica. 67: 1-105.
42. Turesson, G. 1925. The plant species in relation to habitat and climate. Hereditas. 6: 147-236.
43. United States Department of Commerce. 1994. U.S. Divisional and Station Climatic Data and Normals. Volume 1. Ashville, NC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center.
44. Woodward, F. I. 1987. Climate and plant distribution. London: Cambridge University Press.