The Pros and Cons of Using PDAs for Dietary Self-Monitoring

Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Volumn 107, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 739-

  Beasley, Jeannette ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIETETICS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; MICROCOMPUTER; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF DISCLOSURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; UTILIZATION REVIEW; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; DIETETICS; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF DISCLOSURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WEIGHT LOSS;

EID: 34247335828     PISSN: 00028223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.03.023     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Yon B.A., Johnson R.K., Harvey-Berino J., and Gold B.C. The use of a personal digital assistant for dietary self-monitoring does not improve the validity of self-reports of energy intake. J Am Diet Assoc 106 (2006) 1256-1259
2. Beasley J., Riley W.T., and Jean-Mary J. Accuracy of a PDA-based dietary assessment program. Nutrition 21 (2005) 672-677
3. Johnson R.K., Friedman A.B., Harvey-Berino J., Gold B.C., and McKenzie D. Participation in a behavioral weight-loss program worsens the prevalence and severity of underreporting among obese and overweight women. J Am Diet Assoc 105 (2005) 1948-1951
4. Burke L.E., Warziski M., Starrett T., Choo J., Music E., Sereika S., Stark S., and Sevick M.A. Self-monitoring dietary intake: Current and future practices. J Renal Nutr 15 (2005) 281-290