A novel mechanical circulatory approach for patients with cardiogenic shock in the intensive care unit

Heart Surgery Forum

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 75-77

  Bara, Christoph ^a   Ghodsizad, Alireza ^b,c   Kar, Biswajit ^c   Gregoric, Igor D ^c   Lichtenberg, Artur ^b   Haverich, Axel ^a   Karck, Matthias ^b   Ruhparwar, Arjang ^b  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c ST LUKE S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSISTED CIRCULATION; BROCKENBROUGH NEEDLE; CANNULA; CANNULATION; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACORPOREAL OXYGENATION; FEMORAL ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; FEMORAL VEIN; FLUOROSCOPY; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HEART ATRIUM SEPTUM; HEART LEFT ATRIUM; HEART OUTPUT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; NEEDLE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANIMAL; DISEASE MODEL; ECHOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MORTALITY; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURVIVAL RATE;

ANIMALS; ASSISTED CIRCULATION; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOCK, CARDIOGENIC; SURVIVAL RATE; SUS SCROFA; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 34247324375     PISSN: 10983511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.20061214     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Barron HV, Every NR, Parsons LS, et al, for the Investigators in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction. 2001. The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction. Am Heart J 141:933-9.
2. Burkhoff D, Cohen H, Brunckhorst C, O'Neill WW, for the Tandem Heart Investigators Group. 2006. A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Tandem Heart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J 152:469.e1-8.
3. DeWood MA, Notske RN, Hensley GR, et al. 1980. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation with and without reperfusion for myocardial infarction shock. Circulation 61:1105-12.
4. Goldstein DJ, Oz MC. 2000. Mechanical support for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 12:220-8.
5. Hochman JS, Buller CE, Sleeper LA, et al. 2000. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Etiologies, management and outcome: a report from the SHOCK trial registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1063-70.
6. Liang KW, Fu YC, Lee WL, et al. 2006. Intra-cardiac echocardiography guided trans-septal puncture in patients with dilated left atrium undergoing percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy. Int J Cardiol [Epub ahead of print].
7. Miller LW, Lietz K. 2006. Candidate selection for long-term left ventricular assist device therapy for refractory heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 25:756-64.
8. Thiele H, Lauer B, Hambrecht R, Boudriot E, Cohen HA, Schuler G. 2001. Reversal of cardiogenic shock by percutaneous left atrial-to-femoral arterial bypass assistance. Circulation 104:2917-22.
9. Thiele H, Sick P, Boudriot E, et al. 2005. Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 26:1276-83.