Natural duality in minimal constrained self modeling curve resolution

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 20, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 164-169

  Rajkó, Róbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Bilinear spectroscopic data; Borgen plot; Chemometrics; Duality; Principal component analysis (PCA); Self modeling curve resolution (SMCR); Singular value decomposition (SVD)

Indexed keywords

ABSORBANCE; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION; SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS;

BILINEAR SPECTROSCOPIC DATA; BORGEN PLOT; CHEMOMETRICES; DUALITY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSE; PRINCIPAL-COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SELF-MODELING CURVE RESOLUTION; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION; SPECTROSCOPIC DATA;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 34247271407     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.999     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Henry RC. The mental universe. Nature 2005; 436: 29-29.
2. Couder Y, Protière S, Fort E, Boudaoud A. Dynamical phenomena: walking and orbiting droplets. Nature 2005; 437: 208-208.
3. Kaiser J. New panel to offer guidance on dual-use science. Science 2005; 309: 230-230.
4. Vandeginste BGM, Massart DL, Buydens LMC, de Jong S, Lewi PJ, Smeyers-Verbeke J. Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part A and Part B. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1998 and 1999.
5. Booksh KS, Kowalski BR. Theory of analytical-chemistry. Anal. Chem. 1994; 66: A782-A791.
6. Lawton WH, Sylvestre EA. Self modeling curve resolution. Technometrics 1971; 13: 617-633.
7. Borgen OS, Kowalski BR. An extension of the multivariate component-resolution method to three components. Anal. Chim. Acta 1985; 174: 1-26.
8. Borgen OS, Davidsen N, Mingyang Z, Øyen Ø. The multivariate N-component resolution problem with minimum assumptions. Microchim. Acta 1986; II: 63-73.
9. Wentzell PD, Wang J-H, Loucks LF, Miller KM. Direct optimization of self-modeling curve resolution: application to the kinetics of the permanganate - oxalic acid reaction. Can. J. Chem. 1998; 76: 1-12.
10. Quinn AC, Gemperline PJ, Baker B, Zhu M, Walker DS. Fiber-optic UV/visible composition monitoring for process control of batch reactions. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1999; 45: 199-214.
11. Gemperline PJ. Computation of the range of feasible solutions in self-modeling curve resolution algorithms. Anal. Chem. 1999; 71: 5398-5404.
12. Tauler R. Calculation of maximum and minimum band boundaries of feasible solutions for species profiles obtained by multivariate curve resolution. J. Chemom. 2001; 15: 627-646.
13. Leger MN, Wentzell PD. Dynamic Monte Carlo self-modeling curve resolution method for multicomponent mixtures. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2002; 62: 171-188.
14. Jiang J-H, Ozaki Y. Self-modeling curve resolution (SMCR): principles, techniques, and applications. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2002; 37: 321-345.
15. Gemperline PJ, Cash E. Advantages of soft versus hard constraints in self-modeling curve resolution problems. Alternating least squares with penalty functions. Anal. Chem. 2003; 75: 4236-4243.
16. Jiang J-H, Liang Y-Z, Ozaki Y. On simplex-based method for self-modeling curve resolution of two-way data. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2003; 65: 51-65.
17. Jiang J-H, Liang Y, Ozaki Y. Principles and methodologies in self-modeling curve resolution. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2004; 71: 1-12.
18. Rajko R, Istvan K. Analytical solution for determining feasible regions of self-modeling curve resolution (SMCR) method based on computational geometry. J. Chemom. 2005; 19: 448-463.
19. Henry RC. Duality in multivariate receptor models. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2005; 77: 59-63.
20. Tauler R, Izquierdo-Ridorsa A, Casassas E. Simultaneous analysis of several spectroscopic titrations with self modelling curve resolution. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1993; 18: 293-300.
21. Multivariate Curve Resolution Homepage. http://www.ub.es/gesq/mcr/mcr.htm [30 August 2006].
22. Stoer J, Witzgall C. Convexity and Optimization in Finite Dimensions I. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1970; pp 51-57.
23. Henry RC. Current factor analysis receptor models are ill-posed. Atmos. Environ. 1987; 21: 1815-1820.
24. Fukuda K, Prodon A. Double description method revisited. In Combinatorics and Computer Science, Deza M, Euler R, Manoussakis I (eds). Springer-Verlag: London, 1996; pp 91-111.
25. Jaumot J, Vives M, Gargallo R. Application of multivariate resolution methods to the study of biochemical and biophysical processes. Anal. Biochem. 2004; 327: 1-13.
26. Henry RC. Multivariate receptor models-current practice and future trends. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2002; 60: 43-48.
27. Kuhlbrandt W. Bacteriorhodopsin - the movie. Nature 2000; 406: 569-570.
28. Zimanyi L. Analysis of the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle by singular value decomposition with self-modeling: a critical evaluation using realistic simulated data. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004; 108: 4199-4209.
29. Alter O. Paper presented at the Tensor Decompositions Workshop, American Institute of Mathematics, Palo Alto, CA, July 19-23, 2004. http://csmr.ca. sandia.gov/~tgkolda/tdw2004/Alter.pdf (30 August 2006).