Differences in frequency of violence and reported injury between relationships with reciprocal and nonreciprocal intimate partner violence

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 941-947

  Whitaker, Daniel J ^a,b   Haileyesus, Tadesse ^a   Swahn, Monica ^b   Saltzman, Linda S ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR INJURY PREVENTION AND CONTROL   (United States)

^b CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HETEROSEXUALITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARTNER VIOLENCE; PREVALENCE; SEXUALITY; SOCIAL STATUS; ADOLESCENT; CLASSIFICATION; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN RELATION; INJURY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RISK; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; ODDS RATIO; PREVALENCE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 34247268599     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women: Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: US Dept of Justice; 1998.
2. Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet. 2002;359:1331-1336.
3. Coker AL, Davis KE, Arias I, et al. Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23:260-268.
4. Plichta SB. Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences: policy and practice implications. J Interpers Violence. 2004;11:1296-1323.
5. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Cost of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in the United States. Atlanta, Ga: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2003.
6. Dobash RE, Dobash RP. Violence Against Wives. New York, NY: Free Press; 1979.
7. Archer J. Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2000;126:651-680.
8. Brush LD. Violent acts and injurious outcomes in married couples: methodological issues in the National Survey of Families and Households. Gender Society. 1990;4:56-67.
9. Straus MA, Gelles RJ. How violent are American families? Estimates from the National Family Violence Resurvey and other studies. In: Straus MA, Gelles RJ, eds. Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers; 1995:95-112.
10. Straus MA. Women's violence toward men is a serious social problem. In: Gelles RJ, Loseke DR, eds. Current Controversies on Family Violence. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 2004:55-77.
11. Gray HM, Foshee V. Adolescent dating violence: differences between one-sided and mutually violent profiles. J Interpers Violence. 1997;12:126-141.
12. Stith SM, Smith DB, Penn CE, Ward DB, Tritt D. Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: a meta-analytic review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2004;10:65-98.
13. DeKeseredy WS, Schwartz MD. Woman Abuse on Campus: Results From the Canadian National Survey. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1998.
14. Follingstad DR, Wright S, Lloyd S, Sebastian JA. Sex differences in motivations and effects in dating violence. Fam Relat. 1991;40:51-57.
15. Straus MA, Gelles RJ. Violence in American families: how much is there and why does it occur? In: Nunnally EW, Chilman CS, Fox FM, eds. Troubled Relationship. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1988;141-162.
16. Yllo KA. Through a feminist lens: gender, diversity, and violence: extending the feminist framework. In: Loseke DR, Gelles RJ, Cavanaugh MM, eds. Current Controversies on Family Violence. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2004:19-34.
17. Harris KM, Florey F, Tabor J, Bearman PS, Jones J, Udry JR. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research Design. Available at: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design. Accessed September 15, 2005.
18. Chantala K, Kalsbeek WD, Andraca E. Non-response in Wave III of the Add Health Study. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina; 2004. Available at: http://www.cpc. unc.edu/projects/addhealth/files/W3nonres.pdf. Accessed March 22, 2007.
19. Chantala K, Tabor J. Strategies to Perform a Design-Based Analysis Using the Add Health Data. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina; 1999. Available at: http://www.cpc.unc. edu/projects/addhealth/files/weight1.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2005.
20. Dutton DG, Nicholls TL. The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1 - The conflict of theory and data. Aggress Violent Behav. 2005;10:680-714.
21. Archer J. Sex differences in physically aggressive acts between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2002;7:313-351.
22. Johnson MP. Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: two forms of violence against women. J Marriage Fam. 1995;57:283-294.
23. Johnson MP, Leone JM. The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. J Fam Issues. 2005;26:322-349.
24. Riggs DS, O'Leary KD. Aggression between heterosexual dating partners: an examination of a causal model of courtship aggression. J Interpers Violence. 1996;11:519-540.
25. Wekerle C, Wolfe DA. Dating violence in mid-adolescence: theory, significance, and emerging prevention initiatives. Clin Psychol Rev. 1999;19:435-456.
26. Murphy CM, O'Leary KD. Psychological aggression predicts physical aggression in early marriage. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989;57:579-582.
27. O'Leary KD, Malone J, Tyree A. Physical aggression in early marriage: prerelationship and relationship effects. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;62:594-602.
28. Schumacher JA, Leonard KE. Husbands' and wives' marital adjustment, verbal aggression, and physical aggression as longitudinal predictors of physical aggression in early marriage. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73:28-37.
29. Bookwala J, Frieze IH, Smith C, Ryan K. Predictors of dating violence: a multivariate analysis. Violence Vict. 1992;7:297-311.
30. Patterson GR. The early development of coercive family process. In: Reid JB, Patterson GR, eds. Antisocial Behavior in Children and Adolescents: A Developmental Analysis and Model for Intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2002: 25-44.
31. Bograd M, Mederos F. Battering and couples therapy: universal screening and selection of treatment modality. J Marital Fam Ther. 1999;25:291-312.
32. Stith SM, Rosen KH, McCollum EE, Thomsen CJ. Treating intimate partner violence within intact couple relationships: outcomes of multi-couple versus individual couple therapy. J Marital Fam Ther. 2004;30:305-318.
33. O'Leary KD. Conjoint therapy for partners who engage in physically aggressive behavior: rationale and research. J Aggression Maltreat Trauma. 2002;5:145-164.
34. Archer JA. Assessment of the reliability of the Conflict Tactics Scales: a meta-analytic review. J Interpers Violence. 1999;14:1263-1289.
35. Gottman J, Jacobson N. When Men Batter Women: New Insights Into Ending Abusive Relationships. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster; 1998.
36. Holtzworth-Munroe A, Stuart GL. Typologies of male batterers: three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychol Bull. 1994;116:476-497.