Historical changes in abundance of floating-leaf and emergent vegetation in Minnesota lakes

North American Journal of Fisheries Management

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 932-940

  Radomski, Paul ^a  

^a MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ESTIMATION METHOD; LEAF; LITTORAL ENVIRONMENT; SHORELINE CHANGE; VEGETATION COVER;

MINNESOTA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

RUMEX;

EID: 34247268226     PISSN: 02755947     EISSN: 15488675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/M05-085.1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Becker, G. C. 1983. Fishes of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
2. Bernthal, T. W. 1997. Effectiveness of shoreland zoning standards to meet statutory objectives: a literature review with policy implications. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Publication PUBL-WT-505-97, Madison.
3. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York.
4. Byran, M. D., and D. L. Scarnecchia. 1992. Species richness, composition, and abundance of fish larvae and juveniles inhabiting natural and developed shorelines of a glacial Iowa lake. Environmental Biology of Fishes 35:329-341.
5. Carlson, R. E. 1977. A trophic state index for lakes. Limnology and Oceanography 22:361-369.
6. Casselman, J. M., and C. A. Lewis. 1996. Habitat requirements of northern pike (Esox lucius). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53(Supplement 1):161-174.
7. Christensen, D. L., B. R. Herwig, D. E. Schindler, and S. R. Carpenter. 1996. Impacts of lakeshore residential development on coarse woody debris in north temperate lakes. Ecological Applications 6:1143-1149.
8. Elias, J. E., and M. W. Meyer. 2003. Comparisons of undeveloped and developed shorelands, northern Wisconsin, and recommendations for restoration. Wetlands 23:800-816.
9. Engel, S., and J. L. Pederson, Jr. 1998. The construction, aesthetics, and effects of lakeshore development: a literature review. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Research, Report 177, Madison.
10. Farm Services Agency. 2003. National agricultural imagery program digital orthorectified images, Minnesota, 2003. Salt Lake City, Utah.
11. Gabriel, A. O., and L. R. Bodensteiner. 2002. Historical changes in mid-water stands of common reed in the Winnebago pool lakes, Wisconsin. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 17:563-573.
12. Garrison, P. J., and R. S. Wakeman. 2000. Use of paleolimnology to document the effect of lake shore development on water quality. Journal of Paleolimnology 24:369-393.
13. Hatzenbeler, G. R., J. M. Kampa, M. J. Jennings, and E. E. Emmons. 2004. A comparison of fish and aquatic plant assemblages to assess ecological health of small Wisconsin lakes. Lake and Reservoir Management 20:211-218.
14. Hudon, C. 1997. Impact of water level fluctuations on St. Lawrence River aquatic vegetation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54:2853-2865.
15. Jennings, M., K. Johnson, and M. Staggs. 1996. Shoreline protection study: a report to the Wisconsin state legislature. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Publication PUBL-RS-921-96, Madison.
16. Jennings, M. J., E. E. Emmons, G. R. Hatzenbeler, C. Edwards, and M. A. Bozek. 2003. Is littoral habitat affected by residential development and land use in watersheds of Wisconsin lakes? Lake and Reservoir Management 19:272-279.
17. Kelly, T., and J. Stinchfield. 1998. Lakeshore development patterns in northeast Minnesota: status and trends. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Office of Management and Budget Services, St. Paul.
18. Killgore, K. J., E. D. Dibble, and J. J. Hoover. 1993. Relationships between fish and aquatic plants: a plan of study. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Miscellaneous Paper A-93-1, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
19. Laird, N. M., and J. H. Ware. 1982. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38:963-974.
20. Lindsay, A. R., S. S. Gillum, and M. W. Meyer. 2002. Influence of lakeshore development on breeding bird communities in a mixed northern forest. Biological Conservation 107:1-11.
21. Lizardtech. 2003. GeoExpress View with MrSID by ILS. International Land Systems, Silver Spring, Maryland, and Lizardtech, Seattle.
22. Magnuson, J. J., D. M. Robertson, B. J. Benson, R. H. Wynne, D. M. Livingstone, T. Arai, R. Assel, R. G. Barry, V. Card, E. Kuusisto, N. G. Granin, T. D. Prowse, K. M. Stewart, and V. S. Vuglinski. 2000. Historical trends in lake and river ice cover in the northern hemisphere. Science 289:1743-1746.
23. Magnuson, J. J. 2002. Signals from ice cover trends and variability. Pages 3-14 in N. A. McGinn, editor. Fisheries in a changing climate. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 32, Bethesda, Maryland.
24. Meyer, M., J. Woodford, S. Gillum, and T. Daulton. 1997. Shoreland zoning regulations do not adequately protect wildlife habitat in northern Wisconsin. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, State Partnership Grant P-1-W, Segment 17, Final Report, Madison, Wisconsin.
25. MNDNR (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources). 1989. Shoreland management standards: statement of need and reasonableness. MNDNR, St. Paul.
26. Moyle, J. B. 1945. Some chemical factors influencing the distribution of aquatic plants in Minnesota. American Midland Naturalist 34:402-420.
27. Moyle, J. B. 1956. Relationships between the chemistry of Minnesota surface waters and wildlife management. Journal of Wildlife Management 20:303-320.
28. Nichols, S. A. 1997. Seasonal and sampling variability in some Wisconsin lake plant communities. Journal of Freshwater Biology 12:173-182.
29. Ostendorp, W., C. Iscli, M. Krauss, P. Krumscheid-Plankert, J. L. Moret, M. Rollier, and F. Schanz. 1995. Lake shore deterioration, reed management and bank restoration in some Central European lakes. Ecological Engineering 5:51-75.
30. Payton, M. A., and D. C. Fulton. 2004. A study of landowner perceptions and opinions of aquatic plant management in Minnesota lakes. U.S. Geological Survey, Minnesota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Minnesota, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, St. Paul.
31. Pinheiro, J. C., and D. M. Bates. 2000. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer-Verlag, New York.
32. R Development Core Team. 2005. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available: www. r-project.org. (March 2005).
33. Radomski, P., and T. J. Goeman. 2001. Consequences of human lakeshore development on emergent and floating-leaf vegetation abundance. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:46-61.
34. Ramstack, J. M., S. C. Fritz, and D. R. Engstrom. 2004. Twentieth century water quality trends in Minnesota lakes compared with presettlement variability. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61:561-576.
35. Richards, J. A. 1993. Remote sensing digital image analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.
36. SAS. 2002. JMP statistics and graphics guide, version 5. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
37. Schindler, D. E., and M. D. Scheuerell. 2002. Habitat coupling in lake ecosystems. Oikos 98:177-189.
38. Schroeder, S., M. A. Payton, and D. C. Fulton. 2004. A study of the general public's perceptions and opinions of lake and aquatic management in Minnesota. U.S. Geological Survey, Minnesota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Minnesota, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, St. Paul.
39. Skinner, B. F. 1987. Upon further reflection. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
40. Szajnowski, F. 1983. Biotic structure and processes in the lake system of R. Jorka watershed (Masurian Lakeland, Poland) XI. Biomass and distribution of emergent macrophytes. Ekologia Polska 31:793-800.
41. University of Minnesota. 2003. Minnesota air photoguide. John R. Borchert Map Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
42. Valley, R. D., T. K. Cross, and P. Radomski. 2004. The role of submersed aquatic vegetation as habitat for fish in Minnesota lakes, including the implications of non-native plant invasions and their management. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Special Publication 160, St. Paul.
43. Wei, A., P. Chow-Fraser, and D. Albert. 2004. Influence of shoreline features on fish distribution in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61:1113-1123.
44. Wolfinger, R. D., and M. Chang. 1995. Comparing the SAS GLM and MIXED procedures for repeated measures. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual SAS Users Group Conference. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
45. Woodford, J. E., and M. W. Meyer. 2003. Impact of lakeshore development on green frog abundance. Biological Conservation 110:277-284.
46. Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.